Star Wars: Skeleton Crew Episode 1 - Review 'This could be a real adventure'

Disney+’s Star Wars: Skeleton Crew opens with an intriguing premise: a kids-on-an-adventure story set in a galaxy far, far away. From its first frames, the Jon Watts-led series invites comparisons to The Goonies, E.T., and Stranger Things, blending suburban nostalgia with Star Wars mythology. Yet, whether it’s a mere homage or a meaningful addition to the franchise remains an open question. In a Star Wars landscape still basking in the critical high of Andor and recovering from the uneven missteps of The Acolyte, Skeleton Crew treads a precarious line.

The opening episodes establish a tone that feels deliberately geared toward younger audiences, but they resist being pigeonholed as a “kids’ show.” The series begins with a chilling sequence of pirate brutality that wouldn’t feel out of place in The Mandalorian. Jude Law’s masked, enigmatic Captain Silvo leads a raid reminiscent of Darth Vader’s infamous opening in A New Hope. The sequence sets the stakes and stakes a claim: this isn’t just space camp for kids. Still, as the narrative shifts to the suburban sprawl of At Attin, the show’s tone wobbles between youthful exuberance and darker undertones.

Watts, known for his deft handling of suburban life in Spider-Man: Homecoming, brings a Spielbergian touch to the proceedings. At Attin is a Star Wars version of Reagan-era suburbia—cul-de-sacs, frogdog pets, and latchkey kids racing hoverbikes under an artificial night sky. Wim (Ravi Cabot-Conyers), the dreamer at the heart of the story, feels pulled straight from that era’s cultural fabric. His companions—rebellious Fern (Ryan Kiera Armstrong), tech-savvy KB, and the lovable Neel—are archetypes that evoke the likes of Chunk, Data, and Mikey from The Goonies. While this familiarity is charming, it risks becoming a crutch, leaving little room for innovation.

If there’s one thing Skeleton Crew nails early on, it’s its setup of larger mysteries. The cloistered nature of At Attin—sealed off by a sky of swirling clouds and red lights—suggests a world that has something to hide. The kids’ discovery of a derelict starship hidden beneath their suburban woods adds intrigue, with whispers of conspiracy and adventure. Yet, the pacing stumbles when the show leans too heavily on its young protagonists’ antics, particularly Wim’s impulsiveness. His tendency to touch every forbidden button isn’t just relatable; it’s exasperating.

Nick Frost’s SM-33, a dilapidated pirate droid and reluctant babysitter, injects comedic relief that oscillates between endearing and grating. The show’s humor, while serviceable, occasionally undermines the tension. Frost’s groan-worthy puns and slapstick antics feel at odds with the high-stakes drama unfolding around them. It’s a tonal balancing act that could make or break the series as it progresses.

What separates Skeleton Crew from recent Star Wars missteps like The Book of Boba Fett finale or The Acolyte is its willingness to delve into thematic depth. The rigid conformity of At Attin’s society, with its bureaucratic “Great Work” and omnipresent droid overseers, presents a critique of suburban monotony. The juxtaposition of this controlled existence with the kids’ chaotic quest for freedom evokes a tension ripe for exploration. Whether Watts and Ford can navigate this without losing the show’s youthful charm remains to be seen.

Visually, Skeleton Crew suffers from over-reliance on The Volume, the virtual production technology that’s become a Disney+ staple. While it allows for sprawling, otherworldly vistas, it often renders them hollow. At Attin’s streets and the pirate starship lack the gritty, lived-in feel that made the original trilogy’s sets iconic. It’s a recurring issue that underscores the tension between practical effects and digital convenience.

The presence—or lack thereof—of Jude Law looms large. His brief appearances leave much to be desired, teasing a character who may be crucial to the season’s arc but remains frustratingly opaque. The show’s decision to withhold too much too early risks alienating audiences who expect more from such a marquee name. This coy approach to storytelling echoes the mistakes of The Acolyte, where ambiguity often overshadowed emotional resonance.

Ultimately, Skeleton Crew feels like a calculated gamble. It seeks to recapture the nostalgia of 1980s suburban adventures while embedding them in Star Wars lore. The risk lies in how it balances its homage with originality. If it leans too heavily on nostalgia, it could veer into the territory of predigested entertainment, an easy cash grab rather than a meaningful expansion of the galaxy. But if it taps into the deeper themes hinted at in its premiere—the tension between freedom and conformity, the magic of cosmic discovery—it could chart a course closer to Andor’s bold storytelling.

For now, Skeleton Crew sits at an intergalactic crossroads. Its potential is undeniable, its charm evident, but its trajectory uncertain. Whether it becomes a memorable adventure or another forgettable Star Wars detour will depend on how skillfully it navigates the balance between spectacle and substance. Star Wars has always been about hope, and for Skeleton Crew, the hope is that this journey is worth the ride.

Check out our review of 'Way, way out past the barrier'

Dune Prophecy: Sisterhood Above All: Season One Episode 3

Few franchises carry the weight of lore like Dune, and few television series have dared to wrestle with its sprawling, millennia-spanning mythology. With Episode 3 of Dune: Prophecy, “Sisterhood Above All,” the show takes its most confident leap yet, setting aside the procedural political slog of its earlier episodes to deliver a story of revenge, moral compromise, and the burden of legacy. It’s the kind of bold, layered storytelling that evokes the best of Frank Herbert’s work while still grappling with its own limitations.

The episode’s beating heart lies in the fractured relationship of the Harkonnen sisters, Valya and Tula, whose paths mirror and oppose each other in fascinating ways. Tula’s revenge plot against House Atreides—executed with chilling precision—dominates the episode’s present-day narrative. Emma Canning brings unexpected depth to Tula, painting her as both a calculated killer and an empathetic soul wracked with guilt. Her poisoning of the Atreides camp, sparing only a young boy (sure to be a mistake!), is pure Harkonnen theatrics: ruthless and deeply personal.

Valya’s journey, meanwhile, unfolds largely in flashbacks (gosh I hate flashbacks in a six part series - Ed), and Jessica Barden’s portrayal of the younger Harkonnen captures her fiery ambition and simmering rage. 

Her discovery of the Voice, albeit in a rushed and somewhat unearned moment of duress, underscores the emerging themes of power and sacrifice. Yet, as exhilarating as it is to see these threads woven together, the explanation for the Voice’s origin feels reductive, akin to revealing the trick behind a magician’s best illusion. The mystique of such a tool—a cornerstone of the Bene Gesserit’s power—deserved more respect.

Much of the episode’s success stems from its focus on character-driven storytelling. The decision to peel back the Harkonnen sisters’ layers through flashbacks to their harsh upbringing on Lankiveil adds richness to their motivations. This frozen wasteland, with its grim whale-meat economy, mirrors the icy resentment that fuels Valya’s drive for vengeance. Griffin Harkonnen’s tragic fate, manipulated by his sister’s ambitions, cements Valya’s role as a moral wildcard: not entirely villainous, but deeply flawed in her pursuit of power.

The flashbacks also grant Tula a complexity that’s been missing from her previous appearances. Her cold-blooded assassination of her Atreides lover and his family doesn’t just signal her descent into darkness—it highlights her inner conflict. Unlike Valya, whose ambition often blinds her, Tula feels the weight of her actions. This duality makes her a far more compelling figure, one whose choices carry the narrative’s emotional heft.

Thematically, “Sisterhood Above All” raises intriguing questions about loyalty and identity. The titular motto, often spouted by the Bene Gesserit, reveals itself to be more ideological than practical. Tula’s defiance in saving Lila—despite the Sisterhood’s disapproval—exposes the tension between personal bonds and institutional dogma. Meanwhile, Valya’s use of the Sisterhood as a means to restore Harkonnen prestige betrays the Bene Gesserit’s supposed neutrality, tying its origin story to one of the Imperium’s most infamous houses.

Visually, the episode stumbles. The depiction of the thinking machines, with glowing code etched into walls, feels like a missed opportunity for grandeur. For a series steeped in Herbert’s intricate universe, this lackluster representation diminishes the gravity of their introduction. The thinking machines should have evoked awe and terror, yet here they’re reduced to sci-fi clichés. It’s a rare moment where the show falters in translating Dune’s scope to the screen.

Despite this, “Sisterhood Above All” succeeds where its predecessors faltered: it brings the human drama of Dune to life. The tension between Valya and Tula, the echoes of Griffin’s death, and the shadow of the Bene Gesserit’s moral ambiguity elevate the episode beyond mere exposition. These are characters with stakes, caught in a web of personal and political machinations that feel ripped from Herbert’s pages.

Of course, the pacing remains an issue. While the flashbacks are compelling, they dominate the runtime, leaving little room for the present-day story to breathe. The Harkonnen sisters are captivating, but the series risks sidelining other players in its rush to establish their dominance. 

In a six-episode season, every scene must serve the greater narrative—a lesson Dune: Prophecy has yet to fully internalize...

Ultimately, Episode 3 is a turning point. 

By focusing on revenge and its repercussions, it delivers an experience that’s emotionally resonant and thematically rich. It may not have fully solved the series’ larger issues of uneven world-building and pacing, but it proves that Dune: Prophecy can be more than a footnote in the franchise. With the sisters’ fates and the Bene Gesserit’s future hanging in the balance, the spice must flow—and so must the story.

Bene Bits

• Tula’s poisoning of the Atreides family recalls the deeply entrenched vendettas of the Great Houses, a hallmark of Dune’s political intrigue. This act reflects the series’ commitment to exploring the generational consequences of the Butlerian Jihad.

• The episode controversially attributes the discovery of the Voice to Valya Harkonnen during a moment of distress. In the novels, the Voice is a product of millennia of genetic engineering and rigorous training, making this a significant departure from the source material.

• The flashbacks reveal the full extent of House Harkonnen’s fall, portraying them as exiles on Lankiveil, a frozen world of whale meat and fur trade. This contrasts sharply with their future prominence as one of the most feared houses in the Imperium.

• The episode delves into the motto "Sisterhood Above All," challenging its literal meaning by showing Tula’s defiance of the Bene Gesserit’s authority in saving Lila. This tension reflects the recurring theme in Dune of institutions being at odds with individual morality.

• Episode 3 unveils the thinking machines, the key antagonists of the Butlerian Jihad. Their depiction as glowing, code-infused walls sparked debate among fans, as many felt the series missed an opportunity to capture the machines’ existential threat and grandeur.

Dune: Prophecy > Two Wolves Review - Season One > Episode 2

In the rich, sprawling tapestry of Dune: Prophecy, the second episode, "Two Wolves," sinks its teeth into the concept of duality moving at a faster pace than The Hidden Hand.

Borrowing from the proverbial tale of inner conflict, the episode navigates the competing forces of manipulation, ambition, and survival, offering a narrative that feels both expansive and deeply personal.

As the Sisterhood of Bene Gesserit asserts its control in an increasingly volatile universe, the episode juxtaposes the intimate stakes of its key players with the grand machinations of empires, rebellions, and an enigmatic adversary.

The Split Focus: Two Protagonists, Two Journeys

The episode divides its attention between the arcs of Tula and Valya Harkonnen, two sisters bound by allegiance to the Bene Gesserit but pulled by divergent motivations. Emily Watson’s portrayal of Mother Superior Valya captures the calculated gravitas of a leader who operates on a moral axis far removed from empathy.

She's borderline psycho in her belief system.  

Her journey to Salusa Secundus, investigating Tiran-Arafael’s threat, brings depth to the political chessboard of the Imperium. By contrast, Olivia Williams' Tula provides a raw, emotional counterpoint, tasked with the harrowing duty of putting her student, Lila, through the life-threatening Agony.

Valya’s detachment and manipulation highlight her as a consummate tactician—someone willing to sacrifice pawns for a greater design. Yet, this calculated veneer is challenged by Desmond Hart, the episode's wild card.

His immunity to the Voice and his defiance of the Sisterhood’s control unravel her plans, adding a thrilling unpredictability to the power struggle. Meanwhile, Tula’s reluctance to send Lila to certain death exposes her as a character grounded in humanity, an anomaly within the Sisterhood’s ethos of cold pragmatism.

The Agony: A Microcosm of Bene Gesserit Doctrine

The depiction of Lila’s Agony is arguably the episode's most compelling sequence. Chloe Lea’s performance imbues Lila with a layered complexity—both a willing martyr and a victim of institutional cruelty. The ritual, blending poison-induced transcendence with ancestral communion, unearths the deep lore of the Bene Gesserit.

While the CGI rendition of Raquella’s spectral appearance falters, the narrative revelation that Lila’s genetic legacy ties her to the Sisterhood’s founder enriches the mythos. Raquella’s cryptic prophecy, referencing "one born twice, once in blood, once in spice," resonates as a tantalizing mystery, potentially connecting Desmond Hart to a darker inversion of Paul Atreides’ Messianic arc.

The tragedy of Lila’s demise—engineered by the vengeful spirit of her grandmother Dorotea—underscores the dangers of meddling with the genetic and spiritual heritage the Sisterhood venerates. It also serves as a devastating critique of Valya’s leadership, as her ruthless gambit fractures the already fragile unity within the Sisterhood.

Desmond Hart: The Anti-Paul

Desmond Hart emerges as a figure of chaos and power, a shadowy counterpoint to the Bene Gesserit’s calculated dominance. Alive after a sandworm attack and wielding seemingly inexplicable psychic abilities, he challenges both the Sisterhood’s ideology and the stability of the Imperium. His immunity to the Voice destabilizes Valya’s control, suggesting he operates outside the carefully crafted genetic pathways the Sisterhood seeks to enforce.

His Rasputin-like presence in the Emperor’s court, juxtaposed with his ability to burn minds across light years, makes him a figure both terrifying and magnetic.

Desmond’s declaration to eradicate the Sisterhood adds a thematic richness to the episode. It positions him as an existential threat not only to Valya’s plans but to the entire Bene Gesserit doctrine, forcing the audience to question the ethics of an organization that manipulates humanity for the “greater good.”

Is Desmond an agent of chaos or a harbinger of necessary reckoning?

The Political Undercurrents: Atreides and Corrino

The subplot involving Keiran Atreides and the fledgling rebellion against the Corrino Empire feels rushed, hampered by the six-episode constraint.

While Keiran’s secret identity as a rebel spy and his romance with Princess Ynez carry narrative weight, the brevity of these scenes undermines their emotional resonance.

Ynez’s struggle to reconcile her grief over her child fiancé’s death with her loyalty to the Sisterhood hints at a deeper character arc yet to be fully realized.

Emperor Javicco Corrino (beginning to be played very well by Mark Strong), portrayed as ineffectual and easily manipulated, provides a stark contrast to the power players surrounding him. His reliance on Desmond Hart reveals both his desperation and his incompetence, making him a pawn in a game he barely comprehends.

The court’s machinations, including Constantine’s betrayal during a sultry interlude, add texture to the narrative, even as they veer into melodrama.

Winners and Losers: A Game of Sacrifice

If "Two Wolves" reveals anything, it’s that in the universe of Dune, every victory comes at a cost. Valya’s manipulations advance her agenda, but the Sisterhood’s internal fractures deepen, threatening its long-term stability.

Tula loses both her student and a measure of her faith in the Sisterhood, while Lila’s sacrifice highlights the organization’s moral bankruptcy. Desmond Hart, for all his power, remains a wildcard—neither fully a victor nor a villain.

Visual and Thematic Resonance

The episode’s visuals oscillate between striking and inconsistent.

The Agony sequence, while conceptually rich, suffers from underwhelming CGI, but the stark desert landscapes and intricate palace interiors remain evocative.

Thematically, "Two Wolves" excels in exploring dualities: faith versus pragmatism, control versus chaos, and sacrifice versus exploitation.

These tensions mirror the broader Dune universe’s exploration of power and humanity.

-

"Two Wolves" delves deeper into the machinations of its characters and the mythology of its world, delivering an episode that is more focused but unevenly paced. Emily Watson and Olivia Williams anchor the narrative with performances that elevate the material, even as the rushed pacing and occasional visual missteps detract from the overall impact.

As Dune: Prophecy continues, the balance of power and the mysteries surrounding Desmond Hart promise to propel the series toward an explosive reckoning. The spice must flow—and so must the conflict.

Luke Skywalker's Dance with Darkness: A Journey to the Dark Side

The Star Wars saga is a timeless tale of light and darkness, good and evil, and the complex interplay between them. Among its many character arcs, none is more compelling than Luke Skywalker’s evolution from a wide-eyed farm boy to a seasoned Jedi Knight. 

His journey in Return of the Jedi is marked by a profound internal conflict, as he comes perilously close to succumbing to the dark side in his quest to save his father, Anakin Skywalker, and defeat Emperor Palpatine.

From the moment we see Luke in Return of the Jedi, it’s clear he has changed. Gone are the neutral whites and tans that symbolized his innocence in A New Hope. Instead, he wears an all-black ensemble, an unmistakable visual cue of his internal struggles. Black has long been associated with villainy in the Star Wars universe, worn by Sith Lords like Darth Vader and Emperor Palpatine. 

Luke’s dark attire hints that he is walking a dangerous line, his choices poised to determine whether he will follow in his father’s footsteps or rise above them.

Luke’s flirtation with the dark side is evident early in the film, particularly during his rescue mission at Jabba the Hutt’s palace. His demeanor is cold and commanding, a far cry from the optimistic youth of earlier films.

He uses a Force choke—a power typically wielded by Sith—to incapacitate Jabba’s guards, an act that unsettles even the most loyal fans of the Jedi ideal. His confrontation with Jabba is laced with veiled threats, and when diplomacy fails, he orchestrates a brutal escape plan that ends with the destruction of Jabba’s sail barge. The fiery explosion annihilates everyone on board save for Luke and his allies, a moment that calls to mind Anakin Skywalker’s vengeful slaughter of the Tusken Raiders in Attack of the Clones.

These parallels underscore the fragility of Luke’s moral compass, as he balances on the edge of light and darkness.

The thematic tension reaches its zenith in the Emperor’s throne room aboard the Death Star. Palpatine masterfully manipulates Luke, stoking his anger by threatening his friends and pushing him toward violence. When Darth Vader taunts him by suggesting Leia could be turned to the dark side, Luke’s restraint shatters.

In a furious assault, he overpowers Vader, battering him into submission and severing his mechanical hand. At this moment, Luke mirrors his father’s own descent—angry, vengeful, and teetering on the precipice of darkness.

But then Luke sees Vader’s severed hand and glances at his own, realizing how close he has come to losing himself.

In a powerful act of defiance, he casts his lightsaber aside and declares, “I am a Jedi, like my father before me.”

It is the defining moment of Luke’s arc, where he not only redeems himself but sets the stage for his father’s redemption. By choosing mercy over vengeance, Luke rejects the Emperor and the dark side, affirming his identity as a Jedi Knight.

This climactic moment is imbued with visual symbolism. As Luke rises and declares his loyalty to the Jedi way, the black tunic he wears opens to reveal a white interior. This striking detail reflects Luke’s inner journey—though he has been tempted by darkness, his core remains pure. The white lining is not just a costume choice; it is a metaphor for his unyielding connection to the light side of the Force, even as he wrestled with his demons.

Luke’s choice to spare his father inspires a final, heroic act from Anakin Skywalker. Witnessing his son’s unwavering morality, Anakin turns against the Emperor, sacrificing his own life to destroy Palpatine and save Luke.

In doing so, he fulfills the prophecy as the Chosen One, bringing balance to the Force. Luke’s faith in his father, even when all seemed lost, becomes the catalyst for the ultimate triumph of good over evil.

Luke Skywalker’s arc in Return of the Jedi is a masterclass in moral complexity and character development. His all-black attire, coupled with its white interior revealed in the end, serves as a visual metaphor for his internal struggle between light and dark. By resisting the pull of the dark side, Luke not only saves himself but redeems his father, ensuring the legacy of the Jedi endures.

Dune: Prophecy: The Hidden Hand - Review Season One - Episode One

HBO’s Dune: Prophecy arrives as a tempestuous prequel, set 10,000 years before Paul Atreides walks the sands of Arrakis. It navigates the tumultuous waters of the Bene Gesserit’s early machinations. Episode One plunges viewers into the layered political intrigue of the Imperium, trading children for space ships and spice for a baroque tale of ambition, betrayal, and prophecy. 

With its moody cinematography and shadowy performances, Prophecy establishes itself not as a sibling to Denis Villeneuve’s visually stunning Dune films, but as a wannabe descendant of Game of Thrones. The episode spins a web of intrigue, with Truthsays acting like Varris himself but its strength lies in its exploration of power’s fragility and the cost of foresight.

The story opens on Wallach IX, where a young Valya Harkonnen (Jessica Barden, The Lobster) confronts the growing zealotry within the Sisterhood. Her resolve to create a calculated, political Sisterhood lays the groundwork for her transformation into the cold and commanding Mother Superior Valya (Emily Watson, Minority Report). 

Thirty years later, Valya’s consolidation of the Sisterhood’s influence becomes the series’ central axis, as she seeks to place one of their own on the Imperial throne. Emily Watson’s steely gravitas gives depth to a character haunted by Raquella’s dying prophecy: the Bene Gesserit’s looming annihilation.

At the heart of Dune: Prophecy is its refusal to glorify heroics. The episode pivots sharply from the messianic themes of Herbert’s original work, delving instead into the granular mechanics of power. Valya and her sister, Tula (Olivia Williams, The Postman), are not saviors; they are architects of control, leveraging genetic manipulation and political scheming to secure the Sisterhood’s survival. 

Their machinations culminate in an arranged marriage between Princess Ynez Corrino (Sarah-Sofie Boussnina, The Colony) and Pruwet Richese, a union intended to solidify their influence over Emperor Javicco Corrino (Mark Strong, John Carter of Mars). Yet, this plan teeters on the edge of chaos, disrupted by Desmond Hart (Travis Fimmel, Raised by Wolves, Vikings), an enigmatic soldier who embodies the wild unpredictability of divine intervention.

Desmond’s return from Arrakis introduces a new dimension to the Dune mythos. Claiming salvation by a god during a sandworm attack, Desmond emerges as a one-man resistance to the Bene Gesserit’s manipulation. His terrifying power—to telepathically burn a man alive—shatters the episode’s intricate balance. 

The gruesome death of Pruwet Richese at his hands, mirrored by Kasha’s simultaneous demise light-years away, speaks to a larger, unarticulated force at play. Desmond’s vendetta against the Sisterhood reframes the Bene Gesserit as both saviors of humanity and manipulators akin to the thinking machines they once sought to destroy.

The episode’s thematic undercurrent—the price of manipulation—is further explored through Tula’s struggles on Wallach IX. Tasked with training the Bene Gesserit’s acolytes, Tula wrestles with internal skepticism about the Sisterhood’s growing power. The scenes with the young trainees offer glimpses into the institution’s harsh philosophy, contrasting their disciplined future with the chaos threatening the Imperium. 

This dynamic introduces a tantalizing ambiguity: 

is the Sisterhood a necessary evil, or is it sowing the seeds of its own destruction?

Dune: Prophecy takes bold steps to differentiate itself from its cinematic predecessors by eschewing Arrakis for the decadent courts of Salusa Secundus. The absence of spice and sandworms shifts the narrative’s focus to the sprawling political chessboard of the Imperium. The show smartly frames the Bene Gesserit as power brokers in a galaxy still healing from the wounds of the 'Butlerian Jihad' which the shows refers to as the war with the Thinking Machines. Valya’s pursuit of control mirrors the Bene Gesserit’s foundational philosophy: manipulating genetics and politics to steer humanity toward an ideal future. 

Yet, as Desmond’s fiery wrath demonstrates, such control comes with grave risks.

Visually, the episode embraces a gothic aesthetic, its shadow-drenched halls and flickering candles a reflection of the moral ambiguity of its characters. The restrained use of CGI enhances the tactile, lived-in feel of the universe, grounding its grand themes in a relatable, human scale. The musical score, blending eerie choral elements with throbbing percussion, reinforces the series’ ominous tone.

Concept art of young Valya Harkonnen

While Dune: Prophecy deftly handles its political intrigue, its character development falters. Secondary players like Kasha (Jihae, Mortal Engines) and Emperor Javicco feel more like narrative devices than fully realized individuals. The emotional weight of Kasha’s death, for example, is dulled by the brevity of her screen time. Similarly, the young Princess Ynez’s blind commitment to the Bene Gesserit lacks the nuance needed to fully invest viewers in her arc. 

Despite its missteps, Episode One succeeds in laying a compelling foundation. The clash between Valya and Desmond serves as a microcosm of the show’s larger conflict: the tension between order and freedom. Desmond’s faith-driven rebellion against the Sisterhood echoes the thematic core of the Dune saga—the cyclical nature of power and the hubris of those who wield it. Valya’s chilling pragmatism, juxtaposed with Desmond’s fiery zeal, sets the stage for a battle that promises to reshape the Imperium.

Ultimately, Dune: Prophecy is less about the grandeur of Herbert’s universe and more about its shadowy underpinnings. The show’s focus on the Bene Gesserit’s secretive rise provides a refreshing lens through which to explore the complexities of the Imperium. Episode One invites viewers into a world where prophecy is both a guiding light and a harbinger of doom. As the series unfolds, its success will depend on its ability to deepen its characters and maintain the intricate balancing act between intrigue and action. 

For now, Dune: Prophecy offers a dark and tantalizing glimpse into the hidden hand shaping humanity’s future.

The thematic meanings of the 'Sisterhood of Dune' novel

Book Review

Sisterhood of Dune: The Origins of Power and Fanaticism

Eighty years after the Jihad, the Imperium is a fragile balance of emerging powers. Herbert and Anderson explore the collision between progress and regress in this foundational text.

In Sisterhood of Dune, Brian Herbert and Kevin J. Anderson take us back to a defining period in the Dune universe, one rich with emerging political and spiritual forces that will shape human destiny for millennia to come. Eighty years after the Butlerian Jihad, the Imperium is a tense balance of newly established power factions—the Bene Gesserit, Mentats, Suk doctors, and the Spacing Guild—struggling to establish identities and philosophies in a time marked by the deeply divisive shadow of the anti-technology Butlerian movement.

This novel, the first in the Great Schools of Dune trilogy, resonates with timeless themes of fanaticism, knowledge, and societal evolution. Herbert and Anderson brilliantly expand the Dune universe, creating a thought-provoking tapestry that examines humanity’s paradoxical desire for both order and autonomy.

I. Progress Versus Regress: Venport and Torondo

Central to the novel is the collision between progress and regress. This timeless battle is crystallized in the power struggle between Josef Venport and Manford Torondo. Venport, head of the galaxy’s monopolistic space-travel conglomerate, embodies the allure and utility of technology, emphasizing logic, advancement, and control over his enterprise and society. Torondo, on the other hand, represents humanity’s primal distrust of progress. He is an icon of fanaticism who rallies the Imperium’s vulnerable masses against any vestige of the thinking machines.

Here, Herbert and Anderson deftly illustrate how the lust for control, whether technological or ideological, can lead to disastrous polarization. The rivalry between Venport and Torondo underscores the tension between reason and faith, leaving readers questioning the true path to human advancement.

II. The Fragility of Governance

Yet this ideological conflict between Torondo and Venport is more than a binary clash of technocrat versus zealot. Through characters like Emperor Salvador Corrino, the novel illuminates the precarious nature of governance in a fractured universe. Salvador’s hold on power is continually threatened by populist pressures, technological monopolies, and rebellion. Here, the Corrino rule becomes a metaphor for fragile authority, as Salvador’s attempts to balance power reveal his vulnerability. The novel demonstrates that power is not absolute. It requires constant maintenance, adaptation, and, at times, compromise.

Salvador’s struggles exemplify how governance, in its purest form, must navigate a labyrinthine landscape of competing ideologies, illustrating that ruling over an empire is as much about containing its chaos as about providing order.

The foundations of the Great Schools are laid in chaos.

III. The Birth of the Sisterhood

Meanwhile, the origins of the Bene Gesserit Sisterhood bring a unique lens to Sisterhood of Dune, offering insight into the evolution of what will become one of the Dune universe's most powerful institutions. Unlike the cold, manipulative order of Frank Herbert’s original novels, here the Sisterhood emerges from necessity, camaraderie, and survival. Raquella Berto-Anirul, the Sisterhood’s leader, imbues the order with purpose and integrity, even as she engages in morally ambiguous practices, such as using forbidden computers to catalog family genetic information.

Raquella’s efforts are acts of rebellion against the Butlerian purists, setting the Bene Gesserit on a path of quiet defiance that will ultimately define their methods. Through Raquella’s character, Herbert and Anderson explore the theme of legacy and the moral cost of preserving it, showing that power often demands uncomfortable choices in the pursuit of higher goals.

IV. The Mentat Paradox

Another thematic cornerstone of the novel lies in the struggle for knowledge and identity, particularly within the Mentat School led by Gilbertus Albans. Gilbertus’s attempts to hide his robotic mentor, Erasmus, from the watchful eye of the Butlerians reveal a complex internal conflict. The Mentats’ pursuit of knowledge is marked by a paradox: they are the very embodiment of human potential, yet their existence is perilously close to violating the anti-machine principles of their society.

The Mentats’ struggle to thrive under Butlerian scrutiny underscores the theme of intellectual persecution. In Gilbertus, the authors create a character wrestling with his identity as both human and machine learner. His journey is one of navigating treacherous waters, questioning how much of humanity’s legacy can be retained without the technologies that once empowered it.

V. Generational Trauma and Populism

Equally compelling is the portrayal of the Harkonnen and Atreides families, whose blood feud exemplifies the theme of generational trauma. Vorian Atreides and the disgraced Harkonnens, exemplified by Valya Harkonnen’s determination to restore her family’s honor, represent two paths in the face of loss and disgrace. Their stories ask whether one’s destiny is determined by heritage or choice. Vorian’s exile and the Harkonnen’s humble existence on Lankiveil show that family legacy is both a burden and a motivator.

Through these familial arcs, Herbert and Anderson explore how individuals and families attempt to shape their identities while shackled to their pasts, a poignant exploration of heritage in a universe that prizes bloodline and legacy above all else.

The anti-technology fervor of the Butlerian movement, led by Torondo, touches on a theme that feels more relevant today than ever: the dangers of populism and zealotry. Torondo, a populist dictator in every sense, utilizes fear and charisma to incite the masses against any whisper of advanced technology. His rise highlights humanity’s susceptibility to charismatic leaders promising simple solutions to complex problems.

Torondo’s character reminds readers of the seductive nature of fanaticism, with promises that are ultimately empty yet devastatingly effective. This portrayal is both a caution and a reminder that humanity’s instinctual need for purpose can often blind it to reason, making it vulnerable to leaders who exploit rather than uplift.

VI. Religion, State, and Original Vision

Finally, Sisterhood of Dune explores the intersection of religious fervor and political power. The Emperor’s strategic use of the Orange Catholic Bible’s release to quell unrest reveals the complex relationship between religion and the state. The religious undertones and the reinterpretation of ancient texts for political gains emphasize the manipulation of faith as a means of control, asking readers to consider the ethics of institutionalizing belief for the sake of order.

Salvador’s eventual downfall illustrates that exploiting faith as a tool of authority is fraught with risks, especially when that faith becomes the only weapon left to both oppressors and the oppressed.

The themes in Sisterhood of Dune seamlessly connect to Frank Herbert's original Dune universe, weaving a deeper understanding of the ideological roots and institutions that will shape the future struggles on Arrakis. At its core, Sisterhood of Dune builds on Herbert's central examination of humanity’s relationship with power, technology, and ecological responsibility.

The Butlerian anti-technology fervor echoes Herbert's cautionary tales about humanity's dependency on machines and presages the technological puritanism and selective manipulation of genetics that the Bene Gesserit, Mentats, and Spacing Guild later employ. Similarly, the Sisterhood’s early ethical compromises and breeding program reflect Herbert’s complex portrayal of the Bene Gesserit’s role in human affairs, foreshadowing their pivotal influence over centuries.

This novel enriches Herbert’s theme of fanaticism as a double-edged sword, with Torondo’s zealotry mirroring later figures like Paul Atreides and the cult of Muad’Dib. By delving into these foundational conflicts, Sisterhood of Dune not only expands the lore but intensifies Herbert's original exploration of humanity’s unending battle between free will, the allure of messianic power, and the consequences of ideologically driven control over society and nature.

Connection to Dune: Prophecy

Sisterhood of Dune serves as the foundational narrative and inspiration for the television series Dune: Prophecy, which explores the origins of iconic institutions like the Bene Gesserit, Mentats, and the Spacing Guild. As a starting point, the novel delves into the turbulent post-Butlerian Jihad era, where anti-technology fervor and new power struggles begin to shape the Imperium's future. This background enriches the series, bringing to life the early ideological conflicts and ambitions that set the stage for the political and spiritual intrigues central to Frank Herbert’s original Dune saga.

Silo: The final episode of season one explained

The season finale of Silo masterfully fractures the myth of sanctuary that this underground haven clings to, peeling away layers of secrecy that choke its inhabitants.

When Juliette Nichols, Rebecca Ferguson’s raw-boned, no-nonsense engineer-turned-sheriff, is cast outside, the series steps out of claustrophobic corridors and into the void, with a gasping intensity that recalls the post-apocalyptic dread of The Road or Children of Men.

What she encounters beyond the airlock is less a revelation of freedom than a plummet into existential bleakness, one that redefines Silo’s dystopian roots.

It’s not freedom; it’s a grimmer cage.

Juliette's final moments in the Silo are as disorienting as they are crucial. Bracing against her fate, she is forced to confront Bernard, the show’s sinisterly bureaucratic mayor (Tim Robbins, War of the Worlds), who turns her cleaning sentence into a moral riddle.

 

Bernard is part Orwellian authority, part pragmatist, wielding his control over the Silo with a menacingly gentle touch, promising her leniency for her loved ones if she accepts this public punishment. And by sending her out, Bernard preserves not only his control but also the facade of the Silo as a hermetic safehouse against a hellish outside.

But Juliette’s departure cracks that facade for herself and the viewers alike.

As she steps outside, Silo rips into its grand illusion—quite literally—in the form of an ocular trick designed to pacify. The helmet display conjures a luscious, habitable world: blue skies, greenery, even birds flitting across a pristine horizon.

This artificial projection lulls its victims into one last moment of obedience, compelling them to "clean" the sensor, reaffirming the illusion for everyone left behind. The repeated display pattern, the same hopeful, lush world, is a calculated cruelty meant to keep the Silo’s lie alive.

But Juliette, noticing the birds’ repeated, programmed movement (which keen viewers can observe themselves in prior episodes), unearths the truth in a moment of profound horror.

It’s the heat tape, ironically, that lets her see past this deception.

This seemingly innocuous material, a mechanic’s staple in the world below, turns from mundane supply to lifeline. Harriet Walter’s character Walker, Juliette’s mentor, recognizes that the standard-issue tape—designed to fail—is the true cause of death for the condemned.

 

Walker's homemade, industrial-grade tape is a quiet revolution wrapped around Juliette’s suit, allowing her to survive the trek up the hill and past the display’s lies. The decision to trust Juliette’s life to tape recalls the symbolic poignancy of a minor object taking on monumental meaning, a detail Silo hides in plain sight until its significance detonates in the finale.

Juliette’s survival goes beyond defiance; it sparks curiosity and rebellion in others.

By refusing to clean, by cresting the hill to see what lies beyond the display, she becomes the unwitting Flamekeeper that Gloria foreshadowed.

Meanwhile, Robert Sims (Common), Bernard’s enforcer, finds his own allegiance at a breaking point. While outwardly a believer in the Silo’s strict protocol, Sims reveals a subtle internal fracture. His confusion as Bernard mutters, “She knows,” at Juliette’s realization hints at an incomplete awareness of the true machinations within. Sims embodies a brutal paradox—both enforcer and victim of the system he perpetuates, a state apparatchik who may soon discover the extent of the lies he’s built his life around.

Bernard, the icy, calculating overseer, holds a key to one of the show's greater enigmas—the "18" marked on his cryptic access key, linking their Silo to a broader network of isolated worlds. When he uses this key in the finale, viewers are left to wonder:

Is Bernard himself a pawn in an even grander scheme? 

His loyalty, or perhaps his fear, to preserve the Silo’s order suggests that his power is conditional, dependent on following orders from an unseen authority. The number “18” pulls back the curtain, revealing that this oppressive microcosm is one of many, part of a network engineered to keep humanity in stasis.

As Juliette presses further, her encounter with the desolation beyond reaffirms the finality of her journey. What she sees is haunting: a toxic landscape devoid of life, a stark contrast to the illusion in her helmet. The city skyline that punctuates this barren horizon suggests a past civilization decimated, a monument to humanity’s self-inflicted apocalypse. This is no paradise lost; it is a vision of ruin, a tomb that confirms the Silo’s narrative of the world above.

What’s chilling, though, is that the Silo was right—just not in the way its inhabitants were led to believe. The outside air is indeed toxic, a hostile wasteland unfit for life. Juliette’s clarity in realizing this unfiltered truth while grappling with the helmet’s artificial projection—one last visual lie—is perhaps the show’s most philosophical moment.

It’s not only a commentary on survival but also on the existential cost of knowing, the unbearable price of truth.

Silo season one ends not with closure but with an expansion of its oppressive world. Juliette's act of rebellion—by seeing, by refusing to comply—is a spark in the powder keg of a far larger conspiracy. It leaves audiences to question:

Who built the Silo? 

And more urgently, who controls it?

Check out the explanation of the season 2 final of Silo.