Dare Devil: Born Again > Review > Episode One: Heaven's Half Hour

It’s been a long wait since the dark and relentless world of Daredevil last gripped our screens. Six years, a reeling Marvel Cinematic Universe, and the endless crawl of time have passed since Matt Murdock (Charlie Cox- Stardust, Boardwalk Empire) last donned the suit. Daredevil: Born Again hits the ground running, with episode one immediately cementing its status as a worthy continuation of the Netflix series. 

What makes this opening hour so satisfying isn’t just the reappearance of characters we’ve sorely missed, but the shocking departure from the previous series’ tone, taking us into a brutal new era of Hell’s Kitchen. The stakes are instantly elevated, and the emotional crux of the episode hinges on a devastating loss — one that will inevitably change the course of this series.

The episode opens with a slice of normalcy, a rare moment of joy that seems too good to last. Matt, Karen Page (Deborah Ann Woll), and Foggy Nelson (Elden Henson) share a lighthearted moment on the streets of Hell’s Kitchen, reminiscing about their law firm and the good old days. It’s the perfect nostalgic touch — the trio we’ve come to know as the beating heart of the show, reunited for one brief moment. 

But as the Marvel formula goes, serenity doesn’t last long, and the show's true nature comes crashing back in with the arrival of a familiar face: Benjamin “Dex” Poindexter, aka Bullseye. Played once again by Wilson Bethel, this version of Bullseye is the same sociopathic assassin we saw in season three, now equipped with an even more deadly precision and an urge to leave destruction in his wake.

What follows is a near-continuous action sequence that showcases the show’s trademark intensity. As Matt attempts to stop Bullseye from massacring innocents in a bar, the ensuing chaos spills over into a hallway and culminates in a rooftop showdown. The use of a single-shot sequence is masterful, pushing the tension and disorientation of the moment. But this fight isn’t just about the stakes of a typical superhero battle; it’s deeply personal.

As Bullseye mercilessly kills patrons, Matt is forced to reckon with his own past choices. The scene is expertly shot by directors Aaron Moorhead and Justin Benson, known for their sci-fi horrors like The Endless and their turn at Loki, and here, their work pushes the raw emotional undertones to the surface. Matt’s first instinct is to stop the carnage — but when Foggy falls victim to Bullseye’s assault, it shatters something in Matt. This is no longer just about justice; this is vengeance.

The decision to kill Bullseye — to push him off the rooftop — marks a significant shift. Matt’s final act as Daredevil is a brutal one, and it’s clear that this version of Matt Murdock is no longer the same idealistic hero.

The death of Foggy is a game-changer. Elden Henson’s character has always been the emotional anchor for Matt, the steady presence who helps ground him in the chaos. Foggy’s death isn’t just a narrative beat — it’s the moment that forces Matt to abandon his alter ego. His decision to retire from Daredevil comes not out of the realization that Hell’s Kitchen is too dangerous, but because of the personal consequences of his actions. Matt is broken, unable to carry the weight of his dual life. The grief of losing his best friend forces Matt into a self-imposed exile, and that guilt lingers long after the bloodstains are washed away.

The weight of this moment will echo throughout the season, with the repercussions of Foggy’s death hanging over Matt’s every decision.

One year later, we see the effects of that loss. Matt has rebuilt his life, joining forces with Kirsten McDuffie (Nikki M. James) to open a new law firm. He’s no longer Daredevil, and that decision feels permanent. Daredevil: Born Again takes the opportunity to explore what happens when the vigilante steps aside. However, the shift in Matt’s personal life doesn’t erase the shadow of his former self. His conversation with Karen, now living in San Francisco, illustrates the emotional distance that has formed between them. Matt is fractured, unable to heal, while Karen is left to pick up the pieces. Their friendship is undeniably strained, and Karen’s sadness is palpable — a subtle reminder of how far Matt has fallen from his heroic ideals.

And yet, in true Daredevil fashion, this new life is about to be complicated by the return of Wilson Fisk (Vincent D’Onofrio, The Cell, Full Metal Jacket). Gone is the Kingpin we once knew; now, Fisk has a new strategy: politics. The scene where Fisk wins the New York mayoral race is chilling — a direct commentary on the nature of power, corruption, and the dangerous allure of populism.

The contrast between Fisk’s rise to power and Matt’s retreat into civilian life makes for a fascinating juxtaposition. D’Onofrio plays Fisk with an eerie calm, and it’s clear that this version of the character is more dangerous than ever. The character's evolution into a political figure is a brilliant move, tapping into a broader, more topical narrative about unchecked power and fearmongering.

The episode’s portrayal of this transition from mob boss to mayor is one of its most compelling twists.

The episode’s writing doesn’t shy away from creating a more morally ambiguous world. In the aftermath of the trial for Bullseye’s crimes, we see Matt’s internal struggle: he’s no longer the hopeful idealist, but a man still trapped in a cycle of violence and pain. When he faces the reality of a future without Foggy and the weight of the choices he’s made, it’s hard not to feel a sense of inevitability. Matt’s journey toward redemption is going to be a long one, but it’s clear that his return to Daredevil isn’t just a physical one — it’s a moral one. The episode leaves us wondering how far Matt will go to fight for justice when the cost is so high.

In terms of Easter eggs, Born Again peppers in a number of delightful nods for long-time fans. First, there’s the subtle reference to Rogers: The Musical from Hawkeye, which further solidifies this show’s place in the MCU’s ever-expanding universe. Fisk’s mention of Spider-Man also serves as a nice teaser for the future, reminding us of the deep connections between these characters and their larger world. The introduction of Heather Glenn (Margarita Levieva), Matt’s former love interest from the comics, is another key Easter egg, setting the stage for future romantic developments — or complications. The Punisher tattoo on a cop’s arm is a particularly sly reference, teasing the eventual return of Frank Castle, who may find himself facing the complications of his iconography being misused in a world that’s far more politically charged than ever before.

The dark, tragic undercurrent of this episode drives home the show's thematic depth. It’s clear that Daredevil: Born Again isn’t shying away from exploring the complex dynamics between its two most significant characters. The philosophical discourse between Matt and Fisk — both trying to outrun their dark sides in different ways — gives the series a weight rarely seen in superhero television. What makes this so intriguing is how these characters, though diametrically opposed, still share a common thread: the desire to control their fate, whether through violence or legislation. Their shared history makes each interaction even more fraught, and the series wisely focuses on the tension that simmers between them.

Overall, Daredevil: Born Again Episode 1 is an electrifying return to a world we thought was lost. The episode strikes a perfect balance between action, drama, and emotional depth, and it sets up a season that promises to deliver on both the personal and political fronts. The weight of Foggy’s death, the moral struggles of Matt Murdock, and the sinister rise of Wilson Fisk combine to create a thrilling narrative. This episode is just the beginning, and if this first taste is any indication, we’re in for a season that challenges its characters in ways we haven’t yet seen. 

The promise of Born Again is that, for every new battle fought, there will be a moral cost, and that’s what makes the stakes higher than ever before. 

Check out how Born Again Episode 2: Optics was seen.

The Dog Stars - Themes

Ridley Scott’s adaptation of The Dog Stars marks the veteran director’s return to the kind of intimate, existential storytelling that underpins much of his most celebrated work. Known for crafting epic worlds—from the dystopian streets of Blade Runner to the barren alien landscapes of Prometheus—Scott’s approach to Peter Heller’s post-apocalyptic novel is both grand in scale and deeply human at its core. Emphasizing mood, isolation, and moral ambiguity, Scott frames Hig’s journey in stark, expansive visuals, juxtaposing the desolation of a world undone by pandemic with the quiet beauty of nature’s reclamation. 

By focusing on the tension between survivalism and humanity, Scott turns the story into a philosophical meditation on hope, resilience, and the human need for connection—a thematic throughline that echoes throughout his career. With The Dog Stars, Scott moves beyond the spectacle of disaster and into the inner terrain of grief and purpose, creating a haunting yet hopeful vision of life in a world forever changed.

At its core, The Dog Stars examines themes of isolation and the psychological toll of loneliness in a post-apocalyptic world. Hig’s journey is one of survival, but also of emotional endurance in a desolate world. After a pandemic wipes out most of humanity, Hig is left with his dog and his heavily armed, survivalist neighbor Bangley. 

This stripped-down existence forces him to grapple with profound existential questions—what is the purpose of living when the world you knew is gone? The theme of human connection persists throughout the story, even in its absence. Hig’s bond with his dog and his sporadic interactions with Bangley remind us that no matter how dire the situation, human beings are hardwired for companionship. In this way, the story explores how isolation reshapes our understanding of community, companionship, and emotional resilience.

Another major theme is the fragile balance between hope and despair in a world stripped bare of comforts and certainties. Hig is not content to merely survive; he seeks something beyond the immediate needs of food, water, and safety. His flights in his small Cessna plane become a metaphor for this restless search for meaning. 

The dwindling fuel supply represents the finite resources available to him, both literally and emotionally, while his desire to fly beyond his immediate perimeter represents the inherent human urge to explore and hope for something more. In this context, Hig’s journey becomes a meditation on the thin line between despair and the human spirit’s relentless search for beauty, purpose, and possibility, even in the bleakest of circumstances.

The theme of violence versus compassion runs through the story as well. Bangley’s hard-edged pragmatism highlights the darker side of survivalism—a readiness to kill in order to preserve one’s life and resources. Hig, by contrast, is more idealistic, driven by a belief that life should be about more than just survival at any cost. The tension between their two philosophies captures a key moral question in post-apocalyptic fiction: 

Does survival justify abandoning empathy and compassion? 

The story asks whether we lose our humanity when we reduce life to a series of brutal decisions, or whether, even in the ruins of civilization, there’s room for kindness, art, and moral consideration.

Finally, nature and the human relationship with the natural world plays a significant thematic role. The novel presents a world in which humanity’s collapse has left nature to reclaim its space. Hig finds solace and purpose in observing the natural world, particularly in his flights over the mountains and rivers. His love for his dog, Jasper, symbolizes this connection to the natural world and serves as a grounding force for him. 

Yet, nature is also presented as indifferent to human suffering. The juxtaposition of nature’s beauty with its brutal indifference reflects the precariousness of human life. In this way, The Dog Stars offers a nuanced meditation on humanity’s place in the larger ecosystem, suggesting that while nature endures, human life requires a deeper sense of meaning and purpose to truly thrive.

This film should not be confused with the New Zealand kidult show, Children of the Dog Star.

The Sandworm of Dune: Shai-Hulud as a Symbol of Power and Eternity

In Frank Herbert’s Dune, the sandworm—known as Shai-Hulud to the Fremen—is more than just a massive creature lurking beneath the sands of Arrakis. 

It is a central figure in the spiritual and cultural identity of the Fremen, a symbol of divine power, fate, and the eternal cycles of life and death. The reverence the Fremen hold for Shai-Hulud reveals a complex web of religious devotion, philosophical acceptance of mortality, and the pursuit of control over the universe’s most valuable resource: spice. 

By examining the sandworm’s significance, one uncovers profound themes of power, destiny, and human resilience within the harsh desert environment. This essay explores Shai-Hulud’s multifaceted symbolism, delving into its role as a divine figure, a metaphor for existential struggles, and an embodiment of both awe and fear.

Shai-Hulud as a Symbol of God, Fate, and Eternity

The sandworm, known as Shai-Hulud to the Fremen of Arrakis, serves as an emblem of God, fate, and eternity within Frank Herbert's Dune universe. Shai-Hulud is more than a creature; it is a manifestation of the harsh, immutable forces of nature, representing the eternal cycle of life and death, creation and destruction. For the Fremen, the sandworm embodies both the awe-inspiring power of the divine and the inescapable passage of time.

The Fremen’s reverence for Shai-Hulud stems from their recognition of the worm’s central role in their environment and survival. The sandworm produces the spice melange, a substance that extends life, enhances mental capacity, and allows for prescient visions. Thus, the worm becomes a symbol of time and immortality—a paradoxical entity that offers longevity while reminding the Fremen of the inevitability of death. The worm’s existence ties directly to the philosophical notion of eternal recurrence, where life perpetuates through cycles that mirror the endless desert storms and shifting sands.

We have no idea why this was posted. 

Worshipping the Worm: The Cult of Shai-Hulud

The Fremen’s spirituality is deeply intertwined with their worship of Shai-Hulud. Their rituals and customs revolve around the sandworm, treating it as a divine being. This reverence is not born out of blind faith but from a pragmatic understanding of their dependence on the creature for survival. The spice melange, essential to their culture and the wider universe, is a product of the worm’s life cycle. 

Thus, worshipping Shai-Hulud is both a spiritual and practical act.

The Fremen’s rituals—such as the Water of Life ceremony—highlight the transformative power of Shai-Hulud. The Water of Life, derived from a drowned sandworm, symbolizes death and rebirth, a theme prevalent in many religious traditions. The ceremony is a moment of spiritual awakening for the Reverend Mothers, who gain prescient abilities through this dangerous ritual. It mirrors religious sacraments where individuals undergo profound transformation through communion with the divine.

Herbert’s portrayal of the Fremen’s cult-like devotion to Shai-Hulud draws parallels to real-world religions that deify natural forces. The Fremen’s spirituality underscores the human need to find meaning in the environment and the necessity of rituals to create a shared cultural identity. The sandworm’s vastness and mystery serve as a perfect canvas for human projection of divine attributes, echoing the anthropological origins of many faiths.

Fear and Awe: The Philosophy of Facing Shai-Hulud

The Fremen’s relationship with Shai-Hulud is one of both fear and reverence. The sandworm’s sheer size and power inspire awe, while its destructive potential instills fear. This duality reflects the Fremen’s philosophical understanding of life’s inherent dangers and the necessity of confronting them head-on.

In the desert, the sandworm is both a predator and a protector. It punishes those who disrespect the natural order but rewards those who learn to live in harmony with it. The Fremen learn to ride the sandworms, a practice that requires both courage and skill. This act symbolizes mastery over fear and a willingness to embrace the unknown. It is a rite of passage that teaches the Fremen to confront mortality without succumbing to it.

Herbert uses the Fremen’s philosophy of facing Shai-Hulud to explore existential themes. 

The worm’s presence in the desert is a constant reminder of life’s fragility and the importance of living with purpose. The Fremen understand that to survive in the harsh environment of Arrakis, one must accept fear as a part of life and transform it into a source of strength. This philosophy resonates with existentialist ideas about confronting the absurdity of life and finding meaning through personal courage and resilience.

The Sandworm as a Metaphor for Power and Control

Shai-Hulud is not merely a religious symbol but also a political one. Control of the sandworms equates to control over spice production, which in turn means control over the universe. The spice melange is the most valuable resource in the known universe, essential for space travel, longevity, and enhanced consciousness. Thus, whoever controls the spice controls the fate of civilizations.

The sandworm becomes a metaphor for power—both its accumulation and its consequences. The Fremen, through their intimate knowledge of the sandworm and the desert, hold the key to this power. However, they do not seek to exploit it in the same way the noble houses and the Spacing Guild do. For the Fremen, power over the sandworm is a means of ensuring their survival and maintaining their cultural identity, rather than a tool for domination.

Herbert critiques imperialism and resource exploitation through the symbolism of the sandworm. The noble houses' desire to control Arrakis and its spice mirrors real-world historical conflicts over valuable resources. The sandworm’s uncontrollable nature serves as a reminder that true power lies beyond human grasp. Attempts to dominate the natural world often result in unintended consequences, a theme that Herbert weaves throughout the Dune saga.

Poor Things: Themes of Autonomy, Identity, and Power

The world of Poor Things unfolds in a grotesque, sci-fi-inflected Victorian landscape where life, death, and rebirth are reshaped through the scientific lens of Dr. Godwin Baxter. Yet, beneath its surreal aesthetic and speculative premise lies a deeply philosophical inquiry into autonomy, liberation, and societal power structures.

Director Yorgos Lanthimos (The Lobster) and screenwriter Tony McNamara bring Alasdair Gray’s 1992 novel to life with a twisted, darkly humorous lens, using the absurdity of its narrative to magnify questions of what it means to be human. The film’s sci-fi framing is not a mere stylistic choice but a deliberate vehicle to interrogate identity and social constructs.

At the heart of Poor Things is Bella Baxter, a woman resurrected with the brain of an unborn child, whose journey explores the tension between societal expectations and personal liberation. Bella’s transformation from a passive subject to an autonomous being encapsulates the film’s central theme: the reclamation of one’s body and destiny from oppressive forces. This metamorphosis forces viewers to confront their own preconceptions about gender roles, freedom, and human consciousness.

Through its exploration of bodily autonomy, societal power dynamics, and the search for selfhood, Poor Things critiques patriarchal constraints, celebrates radical freedom, and poses the question:

What does it mean to be truly human?

Alasdair Gray’s Poor Things was published in 1992, a period marked by the rise of postmodern literature that questioned traditional narratives and embraced fragmented, self-referential storytelling. Gray’s work is deeply political, engaging with themes of feminism, socialism, and bodily autonomy. His novel reimagines the Frankenstein myth, framing Bella’s resurrection as a political statement rather than a gothic tragedy.

Gray’s socialist leanings are evident in his critique of capitalist structures, particularly through the character of Godwin Baxter, who represents a utopian alternative to patriarchal control.

The film adaptation by Yorgos Lanthimos situates this critique within a visually striking, steampunk-inspired Victorian setting. This aesthetic choice is significant: the Victorian era was a time of rigid social hierarchies, moral conservatism, and strict gender roles. By placing Bella’s story in this context, the film underscores the oppressive structures that women faced historically while highlighting their contemporary relevance.

 

Themes in Poor Things

Bella Baxter’s journey can be read as a feminist allegory about reclaiming bodily autonomy in a world that seeks to control and define women’s experiences. Unlike traditional Frankenstein narratives, where the creature is doomed to isolation and despair, Bella’s story is one of empowerment. She is not a tragic figure but a woman determined to experience life on her own terms, unapologetically embracing her desires and rejecting societal norms.

Her rebirth with the brain of an unborn child symbolizes a radical break from patriarchal control over women’s bodies and minds. Bella’s innocence and curiosity are not weaknesses but strengths, allowing her to question and ultimately reject the oppressive structures around her. Her sexual liberation is particularly significant, as it challenges the Victorian ideal of female purity and highlights the importance of pleasure and consent in defining one’s identity. Through Bella, the film champions the idea that bodily autonomy is essential to personal freedom and self-realization.

Identity, Consciousness, and the Self

One of the film’s central questions is what it means to be human. Bella’s evolution from a childlike, tabula rasa state to a fully autonomous individual mirrors humanity’s journey toward self-awareness. The film suggests that identity is not static but fluid, shaped by experiences, choices, and a rejection of societal constraints.

Bella’s journey is one of self-discovery. She questions her creator, society, and herself, ultimately rejecting imposed identities in favor of self-defined autonomy. Her transformation challenges the notion that identity is determined by biology or social expectations. Instead, the film presents identity as something that must be claimed and shaped through lived experience.

Godwin Baxter’s role as Bella’s creator complicates the dynamic between creator and creation. He is not a domineering, godlike figure but a nurturing presence who encourages Bella’s independence. This subversion of the typical Frankenstein narrative highlights the importance of consent and mutual respect in human relationships.

Power and Societal Structures

The film critiques the patriarchal and capitalist structures that seek to control individuals, particularly women. Bella’s story can be read as a metaphor for breaking free from these constraints. Her rejection of societal norms and pursuit of pleasure symbolize a radical act of defiance against repressive power structures.

Bella’s encounters with various male characters highlight different forms of patriarchal control, from sexual objectification to paternalistic protection. Yet, she refuses to be defined by these interactions. Her insistence on living life on her own terms disrupts the power dynamics of Victorian society and speaks to contemporary feminist movements advocating for autonomy and equality.

The film also critiques capitalist notions of ownership and commodification, particularly in how women’s bodies are controlled and exploited. Bella’s journey toward self-ownership challenges these systems and underscores the importance of freedom and self-determination.

Philosophical and Cultural Implications

The film’s postmodern reinterpretation of Frankenstein transforms the narrative from a cautionary tale of hubris to a celebration of liberation and self-discovery. Poor Things aligns with feminist and postmodern philosophies, rejecting rigid identities and embracing fluidity and autonomy.

The film’s themes resonate in contemporary debates on gender, bodily autonomy, and identity. Bella’s journey can be seen as a metaphor for modern feminist movements advocating for bodily autonomy, consent, and the right to define one’s own identity.

The film also raises philosophical questions about humanity’s essence.

Is identity determined by biology, memory, or experience? 

Bella’s journey suggests that humanity’s core lies in the freedom to shape one’s own destiny, challenging traditional notions of identity and selfhood.

 
-

Poor Things is a radical exploration of human identity, autonomy, and liberation, wrapped in a sci-fi narrative that challenges societal norms. The film critiques patriarchal structures while celebrating the messy, chaotic process of self-discovery. Bella Baxter’s journey from creation to self-determination underscores the importance of bodily autonomy, consent, and the freedom to shape one’s own identity.

In a world still grappling with questions of gender, identity, and bodily autonomy, Poor Things offers a bold, unsettling reminder that humanity’s essence lies in the freedom to define oneself. Lanthimos’s film invites viewers to question societal constraints and imagine radical possibilities for liberation and self-realization.

The Banshees of Inisherin - Themes of Violence, Isolation, and Lost Potential

The Banshees of Inisherin (2022), directed by Martin McDonagh, is a film that delves into the complexities of human relationships, conflict, and societal change within the backdrop of 1920s Ireland. Set during the final days of the Irish Civil War, the story centers on a personal feud between two former friends on a fictional island. 

The film’s themes resonate beyond its setting, reflecting universal struggles with identity, isolation, and the cost of violence.

This essay explores how The Banshees of Inisherin uses the breakdown of personal relationships, symbolic characters, and tragic events to convey deeper messages about societal division and the consequences of unresolved conflict.

Historical and Political Context

The Irish Civil War, which took place from 1922 to 1923, marked a critical period in Ireland’s history. It was a conflict that emerged from a split in the nationalist movement over the Anglo-Irish Treaty, which established the Irish Free State. The pro-Treaty forces believed the agreement was a necessary compromise to achieve independence, while the anti-Treaty forces viewed it as a betrayal of the republican ideal. The war tore apart communities and families, leaving deep scars that would shape Irish society for decades. This historical backdrop is crucial for understanding the allegorical elements in The Banshees of Inisherin.

The film’s setting in 1923, on the fictional island of Inisherin, mirrors the isolation and fragmentation experienced during the Irish Civil War. The island community is small and insular, disconnected from the mainland but not immune to the echoes of conflict heard in the distance. This geographical and emotional isolation reflects the broader divisions in Irish society at the time. The film uses this setting to explore themes of separation, stubbornness, and the inability to reconcile differences, much like the factions in the civil war and the later Troubles.

The personal feud between Pádraic and Colm can be seen as a microcosm of the larger national conflict. Their sudden estrangement, with no clear resolution in sight, reflects the seemingly irrational split between the pro- and anti-Treaty sides. 

Just as families and communities were torn apart by political differences during the war, the characters’ relationships in the film deteriorate due to personal and ideological stubbornness.

The Breakdown of Friendship as a Reflection of Civil War

The central conflict between Pádraic Súilleabháin (Colin Farell, Minority Report, Tigerland) and Colm Doherty is at the heart of The Banshees of Inisherin, and their deteriorating friendship serves as an allegory for the divisions caused by the Irish Civil War. 

Pádraic, a kind and simple man, represents the traditional, pragmatic Ireland that values human connection and community stability. His desire to maintain his friendship with Colm reflects the broader desire for peace and unity during a time of national strife. However, his inability to comprehend Colm’s sudden rejection shows the confusion and heartbreak experienced by those caught in the crossfire of ideological conflicts.

Colm Doherty, by contrast, embodies the more modern, intellectual Ireland, striving for a legacy beyond the mundane. His abrupt decision to end his friendship with Pádraic is driven by a desire for artistic immortality, mirroring the anti-Treaty forces' idealistic pursuit of a pure republic. Colm’s self-destructive actions, including cutting off his own fingers, symbolize the extreme lengths individuals and groups go to in pursuit of their ideals, regardless of the personal and societal costs. 

His rejection of Pádraic illustrates the growing divide between those who sought pragmatic solutions and those who pursued ideological purity.

The feud’s escalation highlights the futility of such conflicts. Pádraic’s transformation from a kind-hearted man into a bitter and vengeful figure reflects the radicalization that can occur when individuals are pushed to their emotional and psychological limits. Similarly, Colm’s stubbornness results in his isolation and personal suffering. 

The tragic breakdown of their friendship underscores the film’s broader message: civil conflict often leads to irreversible damage, both at a personal and societal level, leaving those involved fractured and embittered.

The Role of Siobhán Súilleabháin – The Voice of Reason and Progress

Siobhán Súilleabháin (Kerry Condon) stands apart from the conflict between Pádraic and Colm as a voice of reason, progress, and cultural advancement. Unlike the two men who are consumed by personal grievances, Siobhán values education, rationality, and emotional maturity.

 

She represents a modern, forward-thinking Ireland, seeking a life beyond the confines of tradition and conflict. Her decision to leave Inisherin for the mainland reflects the broader theme of emigration that characterized much of Irish history in the 20th century.

By leaving, Siobhán symbolizes the loss of Ireland’s intellectual and cultural potential due to internal strife and limited opportunities.

Siobhán’s attempts to mediate between Pádraic and Colm highlight her role as a peacemaker in the film. She tries to bring a sense of normalcy and understanding to the situation, but her efforts are ultimately unsuccessful. Her frustration with the stubbornness and shortsightedness of the men around her is a critique of the toxic masculinity that drives much of the conflict.

The yellow coat worn by Siobhán

The coat holds profound symbolic meaning within the film’s bleak, muted palette of earthy tones and desolate landscapes, standing out as a striking emblem of hope, individuality, and the possibility of escape from stagnation and despair. Its brightness visually distinguishes Siobhán from the island’s other residents, reinforcing her role as a progressive figure longing to break free from the insular, conflict-ridden life of Inisherin.

The coat embodies her desire for change and intellectual freedom, contrasting with the dark tones of the island to symbolize her departure from the suffocating mindset of those around her. On a broader level, the yellow color resonates with Ireland’s historical narrative of lost cultural and intellectual potential, often represented by emigration; Siobhán’s leaving, while hopeful for her future, underscores the tragic departure of forward-thinking individuals from rural Irish communities, perpetuating cycles of isolation and conflict.

The Tragic Subplot of Peadar and Dominic Kearney

The subplot involving Peadar and Dominic Kearney adds a dark, disturbing layer to The Banshees of Inisherin, reflecting themes of abuse, power dynamics, and societal failure. Peadar, the local policeman, embodies the authoritarian figure who uses his position to exert control and perpetuate violence. His abusive treatment of his son Dominic symbolizes the unchecked brutality often seen in institutions of power.

In the context of the Irish Civil War, Peadar represents the oppressive forces that inflicted suffering on vulnerable populations, whether through colonial rule or emerging state authorities.

Dominic, in contrast, symbolizes innocence, vulnerability, and the collateral damage of conflict. He is one of the few characters in the film who exhibits genuine kindness and a desire for connection, despite his awkwardness and tragic circumstances. His fate highlights the devastating consequences of unchecked power and the failure of society to protect its most vulnerable members. Dominic’s tragic end, which is implied to be suicide (or even murder), serves as a stark reminder of the human cost of violence and neglect.

The relationship between Peadar and Dominic also reflects the broader theme of generational trauma. Peadar’s abuse perpetuates a cycle of suffering that Dominic cannot escape, much like how historical conflicts and abuses continue to impact future generations.

 

Symbolism and Allegory

The use of symbolism in The Banshees of Inisherin deepens its themes of violence, isolation, and lost potential. 

One of the most poignant symbols is Jenny the donkey, representing innocence and the pastoral way of life. Her death marks a significant turning point in the film, symbolizing the loss of innocence and the tragic consequences of escalating conflict. Jenny’s death mirrors the collateral damage of the Irish Civil War, where ordinary people and traditions were destroyed in the pursuit of ideological goals. 

Her death also signals Pádraic’s transformation from a kind-hearted man into a bitter figure consumed by vengeance.

Another important symbol is Mrs. McCormick, who embodies the traditional Irish banshee figure, an omen of death and doom. Her silent, foreboding presence throughout the film serves as a reminder of the inevitability of death and tragedy. Her role highlights the theme of fate and the inescapable consequences of actions. As a passive observer, she represents a society that has grown accustomed to violence and suffering, no longer intervening to prevent tragedy.

The barren landscape of Inisherin itself acts as a symbol of isolation and stagnation. The island’s rugged, desolate environment reflects the emotional state of its inhabitants, particularly Pádraic and Colm. The lack of vitality and connection in the setting underscores the film’s message about the damaging effects of unresolved conflict and emotional isolation. 

Themes of Masculinity, Isolation, and Despair

The Banshees of Inisherin critiques traditional notions of masculinity and their destructive effects on both individuals and society. The central conflict between Pádraic and Colm is driven by pride, stubbornness, and an inability to communicate vulnerability or emotional needs. This toxic masculinity prevents reconciliation and fuels the escalation of their feud, highlighting the dangers of suppressing emotional expression in favor of rigid, performative strength.

Isolation is a recurring theme in the film, both physical and emotional. The island’s remoteness mirrors the characters’ emotional disconnection from one another. Pádraic, Colm, and even Siobhán experience profound loneliness, which leads to despair and drastic actions. 

Despair permeates the narrative, as characters grapple with existential questions and a lack of meaning in their lives. Colm’s desire for artistic legacy reflects his fear of insignificance, while Pádraic’s desperate attempts to preserve his friendship with Colm show his resistance to change and fear of abandonment.

The film’s exploration of despair underscores the human need for purpose and connection, emphasizing that without these, individuals can descend into bitterness and self-destruction. 

Themes of Chris Marker’s La Jetée (1962)

Chris Marker’s La Jetée (1962) is a masterful exploration of memory, time, and the human condition, constructed with a radical storytelling technique that relies almost entirely on still photographs. At its core, the film grapples with memory as a pivotal force, linking the past, present, and future in an intricate, stable time loop.

 

The protagonist’s recollections serve as both his personal anchor and the foundation of the film’s narrative, blurring the line between memory and reality. By situating the story in a dystopian, post-nuclear war setting, Marker emphasizes the fragility of human existence and the importance of memory as a means of reconstructing identity in the aftermath of devastation.

 The film’s central love story adds an emotional depth to its existential themes. The protagonist’s connection with the woman he meets in the past serves as a fleeting sanctuary from the oppressive reality of his present. Their relationship embodies the duality of hope and inevitability, as the protagonist’s attempts to revisit the past cannot escape the constraints of time or the cyclical nature of his fate. This doomed romance echoes broader philosophical questions about the human longing for permanence in an impermanent world. Love, in La Jetée, becomes a poignant symbol of both solace and inevitability, deeply intertwined with the film’s meditation on mortality.

Marker’s deliberate use of still images challenges conventional cinematic storytelling, inviting viewers to reflect on the fragmented and subjective nature of perception. The juxtaposition of static visuals with a dynamic narrative heightens the tension between movement and stasis, mirroring the protagonist’s existential struggle within the constraints of time. This innovative approach emphasizes how memory operates—through snapshots of experience rather than continuous flow—further aligning the film’s form with its thematic exploration of memory and temporality. By eschewing traditional motion, Marker creates a haunting visual language that captures the lingering weight of time and the inevitability of its passage.

The theme of predestination looms large in La Jetée, as the protagonist’s journey unfolds within a stable time loop. The story underscores the inevitability of events, suggesting that human actions are inextricably bound to fate. This philosophical exploration of determinism resonates through the protagonist’s realization that his death is both the catalyst for and conclusion of his journey. 

In its portrayal of time travel, La Jetée examines the dual-edged power of technology. Set against the backdrop of a post-apocalyptic world, the film reflects both the potential and peril of scientific advancement. The experiments conducted on the protagonist highlight technology’s capacity to transcend temporal boundaries but also its ability to dehumanize and exploit. 

This tension mirrors broader societal anxieties during the Cold War, when technological progress was both celebrated and feared for its role in nuclear proliferation and existential threats.

Marker also weaves in motifs of death and rebirth, exploring the cyclical nature of existence. The protagonist’s ultimate fate—his death in the very scene he recalls from childhood—becomes a symbolic merging of beginning and end. This fatalistic conclusion underscores the film’s philosophical meditation on the interconnectedness of life’s moments and the inescapability of time’s grip. Death in La Jetée is not merely an endpoint but a pivotal moment that anchors the entire narrative, suggesting that renewal and destruction are inexorably linked.

The broader cultural and political context of La Jetée amplifies its resonance. Released in the early 1960s, the film reflects the existential anxieties of the Cold War era, particularly fears of nuclear annihilation and the fragility of civilization. As part of the Left Bank artistic movement, it embodies the experimental and intellectual spirit of the time, engaging with philosophical questions about humanity’s place in a world shaped by rapid technological and political change. 

Ultimately, La Jetée is a meditation on the human condition, using its innovative visual style and profound narrative to explore themes of love, loss, memory, and mortality. Its enduring influence on cinema, inspiring works such as Terry Gilliam's 12 Monkeys (1995) and 2073, underscores its significance as a landmark in science fiction and experimental filmmaking. 

Themes of '2073' directed by Asif Kapadia

Asif Kapadia’s 2073 reimagines the philosophical and narrative depth of Chris Marker’s La Jetée, updating its themes for a world grappling with existential crises on multiple fronts.

Drawing from Marker’s meditation on time, memory, and human fragility, Kapadia’s film creates a vivid, haunting exploration of the human condition in the face of an uncertain future.

Set in a post-apocalyptic world, 2073 weaves together personal and collective struggles, creating a tapestry of existential questions that resonate deeply with contemporary audiences.

At the heart of 2073 lies the theme of memory and time. Just as La Jetée used memory as the anchor for its exploration of temporality, Kapadia’s film positions memory as both a refuge and a battleground. The protagonist, driven by fragments of the past, navigates a world where the boundaries between memory, imagination, and reality blur.

Time travel becomes less a technological marvel and more a psychological journey, where memory serves as both salvation and torment.

 

This framing invites viewers to consider the fragility of memory, particularly in a world where technology increasingly mediates how we remember and reconstruct our lives. By tying memory to the protagonist’s attempts to change the future, Kapadia suggests that humanity’s future is inherently tied to its capacity to understand and reconcile its past.

The theme of love and loss adds a poignant human dimension to the dystopian narrative. Much like La Jetée, Kapadia’s film introduces a love story that serves as a fleeting sanctuary for the protagonist amid chaos. The relationship is tender yet ephemeral, offering a brief reprieve from the protagonist’s existential despair. Samantha Morton (Minority Report) and Naomi Ackie (The Rise of Skywalker) deliver performances that embody the bittersweet nature of their characters’ connection, imbuing their relationship with both hope and inevitability.

In a world disintegrating under the weight of its own failures, love emerges as a fragile but vital force, a reminder of what it means to be human. Yet, as in Marker’s work, the love story is doomed, emphasizing the inescapable constraints of time and circumstance.

Kapadia builds a compelling vision of post-apocalyptic existentialism, rooted in the stark visuals of a decaying world. While La Jetée depicted the aftermath of nuclear devastation, 2073 confronts the fallout of ecological collapse and technological overreach. The film’s visual landscape—marked by barren cities, ruined infrastructure, and ghostly remnants of the past—serves as both a warning and a reflection of humanity’s precarious position. Kapadia uses this desolation to probe questions of resilience and meaning.

How does humanity find purpose in the face of near-total annihilation?

How do individuals and societies reconstruct identity when everything they have built lies in ruins?

These questions resonate with a contemporary world grappling with climate change, mass displacement, and political instability, making 2073 as much a cultural critique as it is a science fiction narrative.

The film’s exploration of fate and predestination echoes the philosophical underpinnings of La Jetée. Kapadia retains the concept of a stable time loop, where the protagonist’s fate is sealed from the start. However, he expands this theme to reflect on humanity’s broader historical cycles of self-destruction and renewal. The protagonist’s attempts to alter the course of history are doomed to fail, illustrating the tragic inevitability of events.

This fatalism serves as a commentary on contemporary issues, such as the climate crisis and the persistence of systemic inequalities, where solutions are often hindered by entrenched structures and short-term thinking.

Technology and power form another critical axis of 2073. In Kapadia’s dystopian world, time travel technology represents both salvation and oppression. Controlled by shadowy forces, the technology is used to manipulate and exploit, reflecting the double-edged nature of human innovation. Kapadia’s vision critiques the unchecked pursuit of technological advancement, paralleling real-world debates about artificial intelligence, surveillance, and the ethics of bioengineering.

Finally, 2073 delves deeply into themes of death and rebirth, framing the protagonist’s journey as both a personal and a universal reckoning.

The protagonist’s ultimate sacrifice becomes the catalyst for the film’s cyclical narrative, echoing the idea that destruction often precedes renewal. Kapadia uses this theme to suggest that humanity’s survival may depend on its willingness to confront mortality and embrace transformation.

This perspective resonates with current global challenges, where crises like climate change and pandemics force societies to reckon with their vulnerabilities and consider radical changes to ensure their future.

Kapadia’s 2073 is a deeply resonant exploration of memory, love, fate, and technology, crafted with the philosophical depth and aesthetic ambition of its predecessor La Jetée.

By updating these themes for a contemporary audience, Kapadia creates a work that is both timeless and urgently relevant, offering a profound meditation on humanity’s place in an uncertain and often hostile world.

Fun Fact: Terry Gilliam's 12 Monkeys used concepts directly taken from La Jettee.