Dune: Prophecy > Two Wolves Review - Season One > Episode 2

In the rich, sprawling tapestry of Dune: Prophecy, the second episode, "Two Wolves," sinks its teeth into the concept of duality moving at a faster pace than The Hidden Hand.

Borrowing from the proverbial tale of inner conflict, the episode navigates the competing forces of manipulation, ambition, and survival, offering a narrative that feels both expansive and deeply personal.

As the Sisterhood of Bene Gesserit asserts its control in an increasingly volatile universe, the episode juxtaposes the intimate stakes of its key players with the grand machinations of empires, rebellions, and an enigmatic adversary.

The Split Focus: Two Protagonists, Two Journeys

The episode divides its attention between the arcs of Tula and Valya Harkonnen, two sisters bound by allegiance to the Bene Gesserit but pulled by divergent motivations. Emily Watson’s portrayal of Mother Superior Valya captures the calculated gravitas of a leader who operates on a moral axis far removed from empathy.

She's borderline psycho in her belief system.  

Her journey to Salusa Secundus, investigating Tiran-Arafael’s threat, brings depth to the political chessboard of the Imperium. By contrast, Olivia Williams' Tula provides a raw, emotional counterpoint, tasked with the harrowing duty of putting her student, Lila, through the life-threatening Agony.

Valya’s detachment and manipulation highlight her as a consummate tactician—someone willing to sacrifice pawns for a greater design. Yet, this calculated veneer is challenged by Desmond Hart, the episode's wild card.

His immunity to the Voice and his defiance of the Sisterhood’s control unravel her plans, adding a thrilling unpredictability to the power struggle. Meanwhile, Tula’s reluctance to send Lila to certain death exposes her as a character grounded in humanity, an anomaly within the Sisterhood’s ethos of cold pragmatism.

The Agony: A Microcosm of Bene Gesserit Doctrine

The depiction of Lila’s Agony is arguably the episode's most compelling sequence. Chloe Lea’s performance imbues Lila with a layered complexity—both a willing martyr and a victim of institutional cruelty. The ritual, blending poison-induced transcendence with ancestral communion, unearths the deep lore of the Bene Gesserit.

While the CGI rendition of Raquella’s spectral appearance falters, the narrative revelation that Lila’s genetic legacy ties her to the Sisterhood’s founder enriches the mythos. Raquella’s cryptic prophecy, referencing "one born twice, once in blood, once in spice," resonates as a tantalizing mystery, potentially connecting Desmond Hart to a darker inversion of Paul Atreides’ Messianic arc.

The tragedy of Lila’s demise—engineered by the vengeful spirit of her grandmother Dorotea—underscores the dangers of meddling with the genetic and spiritual heritage the Sisterhood venerates. It also serves as a devastating critique of Valya’s leadership, as her ruthless gambit fractures the already fragile unity within the Sisterhood.

Desmond Hart: The Anti-Paul

Desmond Hart emerges as a figure of chaos and power, a shadowy counterpoint to the Bene Gesserit’s calculated dominance. Alive after a sandworm attack and wielding seemingly inexplicable psychic abilities, he challenges both the Sisterhood’s ideology and the stability of the Imperium. His immunity to the Voice destabilizes Valya’s control, suggesting he operates outside the carefully crafted genetic pathways the Sisterhood seeks to enforce.

His Rasputin-like presence in the Emperor’s court, juxtaposed with his ability to burn minds across light years, makes him a figure both terrifying and magnetic.

Desmond’s declaration to eradicate the Sisterhood adds a thematic richness to the episode. It positions him as an existential threat not only to Valya’s plans but to the entire Bene Gesserit doctrine, forcing the audience to question the ethics of an organization that manipulates humanity for the “greater good.”

Is Desmond an agent of chaos or a harbinger of necessary reckoning?

The Political Undercurrents: Atreides and Corrino

The subplot involving Keiran Atreides and the fledgling rebellion against the Corrino Empire feels rushed, hampered by the six-episode constraint.

While Keiran’s secret identity as a rebel spy and his romance with Princess Ynez carry narrative weight, the brevity of these scenes undermines their emotional resonance.

Ynez’s struggle to reconcile her grief over her child fiancé’s death with her loyalty to the Sisterhood hints at a deeper character arc yet to be fully realized.

Emperor Javicco Corrino (beginning to be played very well by Mark Strong), portrayed as ineffectual and easily manipulated, provides a stark contrast to the power players surrounding him. His reliance on Desmond Hart reveals both his desperation and his incompetence, making him a pawn in a game he barely comprehends.

The court’s machinations, including Constantine’s betrayal during a sultry interlude, add texture to the narrative, even as they veer into melodrama.

Winners and Losers: A Game of Sacrifice

If "Two Wolves" reveals anything, it’s that in the universe of Dune, every victory comes at a cost. Valya’s manipulations advance her agenda, but the Sisterhood’s internal fractures deepen, threatening its long-term stability.

Tula loses both her student and a measure of her faith in the Sisterhood, while Lila’s sacrifice highlights the organization’s moral bankruptcy. Desmond Hart, for all his power, remains a wildcard—neither fully a victor nor a villain.

Visual and Thematic Resonance

The episode’s visuals oscillate between striking and inconsistent.

The Agony sequence, while conceptually rich, suffers from underwhelming CGI, but the stark desert landscapes and intricate palace interiors remain evocative.

Thematically, "Two Wolves" excels in exploring dualities: faith versus pragmatism, control versus chaos, and sacrifice versus exploitation.

These tensions mirror the broader Dune universe’s exploration of power and humanity.

-

"Two Wolves" delves deeper into the machinations of its characters and the mythology of its world, delivering an episode that is more focused but unevenly paced. Emily Watson and Olivia Williams anchor the narrative with performances that elevate the material, even as the rushed pacing and occasional visual missteps detract from the overall impact.

As Dune: Prophecy continues, the balance of power and the mysteries surrounding Desmond Hart promise to propel the series toward an explosive reckoning. The spice must flow—and so must the conflict.

Leave a Comment

Luke Skywalker's Dance with Darkness: A Journey to the Dark Side

The Star Wars saga is a timeless tale of light and darkness, good and evil, and the complex interplay between them. Among its many character arcs, none is more compelling than Luke Skywalker’s evolution from a wide-eyed farm boy to a seasoned Jedi Knight. 

His journey in Return of the Jedi is marked by a profound internal conflict, as he comes perilously close to succumbing to the dark side in his quest to save his father, Anakin Skywalker, and defeat Emperor Palpatine.

From the moment we see Luke in Return of the Jedi, it’s clear he has changed. Gone are the neutral whites and tans that symbolized his innocence in A New Hope. Instead, he wears an all-black ensemble, an unmistakable visual cue of his internal struggles. Black has long been associated with villainy in the Star Wars universe, worn by Sith Lords like Darth Vader and Emperor Palpatine. 

Luke’s dark attire hints that he is walking a dangerous line, his choices poised to determine whether he will follow in his father’s footsteps or rise above them.

Luke’s flirtation with the dark side is evident early in the film, particularly during his rescue mission at Jabba the Hutt’s palace. His demeanor is cold and commanding, a far cry from the optimistic youth of earlier films.

He uses a Force choke—a power typically wielded by Sith—to incapacitate Jabba’s guards, an act that unsettles even the most loyal fans of the Jedi ideal. His confrontation with Jabba is laced with veiled threats, and when diplomacy fails, he orchestrates a brutal escape plan that ends with the destruction of Jabba’s sail barge. The fiery explosion annihilates everyone on board save for Luke and his allies, a moment that calls to mind Anakin Skywalker’s vengeful slaughter of the Tusken Raiders in Attack of the Clones.

These parallels underscore the fragility of Luke’s moral compass, as he balances on the edge of light and darkness.

The thematic tension reaches its zenith in the Emperor’s throne room aboard the Death Star. Palpatine masterfully manipulates Luke, stoking his anger by threatening his friends and pushing him toward violence. When Darth Vader taunts him by suggesting Leia could be turned to the dark side, Luke’s restraint shatters.

In a furious assault, he overpowers Vader, battering him into submission and severing his mechanical hand. At this moment, Luke mirrors his father’s own descent—angry, vengeful, and teetering on the precipice of darkness.

But then Luke sees Vader’s severed hand and glances at his own, realizing how close he has come to losing himself.

In a powerful act of defiance, he casts his lightsaber aside and declares, “I am a Jedi, like my father before me.”

It is the defining moment of Luke’s arc, where he not only redeems himself but sets the stage for his father’s redemption. By choosing mercy over vengeance, Luke rejects the Emperor and the dark side, affirming his identity as a Jedi Knight.

This climactic moment is imbued with visual symbolism. As Luke rises and declares his loyalty to the Jedi way, the black tunic he wears opens to reveal a white interior. This striking detail reflects Luke’s inner journey—though he has been tempted by darkness, his core remains pure. The white lining is not just a costume choice; it is a metaphor for his unyielding connection to the light side of the Force, even as he wrestled with his demons.

Luke’s choice to spare his father inspires a final, heroic act from Anakin Skywalker. Witnessing his son’s unwavering morality, Anakin turns against the Emperor, sacrificing his own life to destroy Palpatine and save Luke.

In doing so, he fulfills the prophecy as the Chosen One, bringing balance to the Force. Luke’s faith in his father, even when all seemed lost, becomes the catalyst for the ultimate triumph of good over evil.

Luke Skywalker’s arc in Return of the Jedi is a masterclass in moral complexity and character development. His all-black attire, coupled with its white interior revealed in the end, serves as a visual metaphor for his internal struggle between light and dark. By resisting the pull of the dark side, Luke not only saves himself but redeems his father, ensuring the legacy of the Jedi endures.

Leave a Comment

Dune: Prophecy: The Hidden Hand - Review Season One - Episode One

HBO’s Dune: Prophecy arrives as a tempestuous prequel, set 10,000 years before Paul Atreides walks the sands of Arrakis. It navigates the tumultuous waters of the Bene Gesserit’s early machinations. Episode One plunges viewers into the layered political intrigue of the Imperium, trading children for space ships and spice for a baroque tale of ambition, betrayal, and prophecy. 

With its moody cinematography and shadowy performances, Prophecy establishes itself not as a sibling to Denis Villeneuve’s visually stunning Dune films, but as a wannabe descendant of Game of Thrones. The episode spins a web of intrigue, with Truthsays acting like Varris himself but its strength lies in its exploration of power’s fragility and the cost of foresight.

The story opens on Wallach IX, where a young Valya Harkonnen (Jessica Barden, The Lobster) confronts the growing zealotry within the Sisterhood. Her resolve to create a calculated, political Sisterhood lays the groundwork for her transformation into the cold and commanding Mother Superior Valya (Emily Watson, Minority Report). 

Thirty years later, Valya’s consolidation of the Sisterhood’s influence becomes the series’ central axis, as she seeks to place one of their own on the Imperial throne. Emily Watson’s steely gravitas gives depth to a character haunted by Raquella’s dying prophecy: the Bene Gesserit’s looming annihilation.

At the heart of Dune: Prophecy is its refusal to glorify heroics. The episode pivots sharply from the messianic themes of Herbert’s original work, delving instead into the granular mechanics of power. Valya and her sister, Tula (Olivia Williams, The Postman), are not saviors; they are architects of control, leveraging genetic manipulation and political scheming to secure the Sisterhood’s survival. 

Their machinations culminate in an arranged marriage between Princess Ynez Corrino (Sarah-Sofie Boussnina, The Colony) and Pruwet Richese, a union intended to solidify their influence over Emperor Javicco Corrino (Mark Strong, John Carter of Mars). Yet, this plan teeters on the edge of chaos, disrupted by Desmond Hart (Travis Fimmel, Raised by Wolves, Vikings), an enigmatic soldier who embodies the wild unpredictability of divine intervention.

Desmond’s return from Arrakis introduces a new dimension to the Dune mythos. Claiming salvation by a god during a sandworm attack, Desmond emerges as a one-man resistance to the Bene Gesserit’s manipulation. His terrifying power—to telepathically burn a man alive—shatters the episode’s intricate balance. 

The gruesome death of Pruwet Richese at his hands, mirrored by Kasha’s simultaneous demise light-years away, speaks to a larger, unarticulated force at play. Desmond’s vendetta against the Sisterhood reframes the Bene Gesserit as both saviors of humanity and manipulators akin to the thinking machines they once sought to destroy.

The episode’s thematic undercurrent—the price of manipulation—is further explored through Tula’s struggles on Wallach IX. Tasked with training the Bene Gesserit’s acolytes, Tula wrestles with internal skepticism about the Sisterhood’s growing power. The scenes with the young trainees offer glimpses into the institution’s harsh philosophy, contrasting their disciplined future with the chaos threatening the Imperium. 

This dynamic introduces a tantalizing ambiguity: 

is the Sisterhood a necessary evil, or is it sowing the seeds of its own destruction?

Dune: Prophecy takes bold steps to differentiate itself from its cinematic predecessors by eschewing Arrakis for the decadent courts of Salusa Secundus. The absence of spice and sandworms shifts the narrative’s focus to the sprawling political chessboard of the Imperium. The show smartly frames the Bene Gesserit as power brokers in a galaxy still healing from the wounds of the 'Butlerian Jihad' which the shows refers to as the war with the Thinking Machines. Valya’s pursuit of control mirrors the Bene Gesserit’s foundational philosophy: manipulating genetics and politics to steer humanity toward an ideal future. 

Yet, as Desmond’s fiery wrath demonstrates, such control comes with grave risks.

Visually, the episode embraces a gothic aesthetic, its shadow-drenched halls and flickering candles a reflection of the moral ambiguity of its characters. The restrained use of CGI enhances the tactile, lived-in feel of the universe, grounding its grand themes in a relatable, human scale. The musical score, blending eerie choral elements with throbbing percussion, reinforces the series’ ominous tone.

Concept art of young Valya Harkonnen

While Dune: Prophecy deftly handles its political intrigue, its character development falters. Secondary players like Kasha (Jihae, Mortal Engines) and Emperor Javicco feel more like narrative devices than fully realized individuals. The emotional weight of Kasha’s death, for example, is dulled by the brevity of her screen time. Similarly, the young Princess Ynez’s blind commitment to the Bene Gesserit lacks the nuance needed to fully invest viewers in her arc. 

Despite its missteps, Episode One succeeds in laying a compelling foundation. The clash between Valya and Desmond serves as a microcosm of the show’s larger conflict: the tension between order and freedom. Desmond’s faith-driven rebellion against the Sisterhood echoes the thematic core of the Dune saga—the cyclical nature of power and the hubris of those who wield it. Valya’s chilling pragmatism, juxtaposed with Desmond’s fiery zeal, sets the stage for a battle that promises to reshape the Imperium.

Ultimately, Dune: Prophecy is less about the grandeur of Herbert’s universe and more about its shadowy underpinnings. The show’s focus on the Bene Gesserit’s secretive rise provides a refreshing lens through which to explore the complexities of the Imperium. Episode One invites viewers into a world where prophecy is both a guiding light and a harbinger of doom. As the series unfolds, its success will depend on its ability to deepen its characters and maintain the intricate balancing act between intrigue and action. 

For now, Dune: Prophecy offers a dark and tantalizing glimpse into the hidden hand shaping humanity’s future.

Leave a Comment

The thematic meanings of the 'Sisterhood of Dune' novel

In Sisterhood of Dune, Brian Herbert and Kevin J. Anderson take us back to a defining period in the Dune universe, one rich with emerging political and spiritual forces that will shape human destiny for millennia to come. Eighty years after the Butlerian Jihad, the Imperium is a tense balance of newly established power factions—the Bene Gesserit, Mentats, Suk doctors, and the Spacing Guild—struggling to establish identities and philosophies in a time marked by the deeply divisive shadow of the anti-technology Butlerian movement.

This novel, the first in the Great Schools of Dune trilogy, resonates with timeless themes of fanaticism, knowledge, and societal evolution. Herbert and Anderson brilliantly expand the Dune universe, creating a thought-provoking tapestry that examines humanity’s paradoxical desire for both order and autonomy.

Central to the novel is the collision between progress and regress—a timeless battle crystallized in the power struggle between Josef Venport and Manford Torondo. Venport, head of the galaxy’s monopolistic space-travel conglomerate, embodies the allure and utility of technology, emphasizing logic, advancement, and control over his enterprise and society. Torondo, on the other hand, represents humanity’s primal distrust of progress, an icon of fanaticism who rallies the Imperium’s vulnerable masses against any vestige of the thinking machines. 

Here, Herbert and Anderson deftly illustrate how the lust for control, whether technological or ideological, can lead to disastrous polarization. The rivalry between Venport and Torondo underscores the tension between reason and faith, leaving readers questioning the true path to human advancement.

Yet this ideological conflict between Torondo and Venport is more than a binary clash of technocrat versus zealot. Through characters like Emperor Salvador Corrino, the novel illuminates the precarious nature of governance in a fractured universe. Salvador’s hold on power is continually threatened by populist pressures, technological monopolies, and rebellion. Here, the Corrino rule becomes a metaphor for fragile authority, as Salvador’s attempts to balance power reveal his vulnerability. The novel demonstrates that power is not absolute—it requires constant maintenance, adaptation, and, at times, compromise.

Salvador’s struggles exemplify how governance, in its purest form, must navigate a labyrinthine landscape of competing ideologies, illustrating that ruling over an empire is as much about containing its chaos as about providing order.

Meanwhile, the origins of the Bene Gesserit Sisterhood bring a unique lens to Sisterhood of Dune, offering insight into the evolution of what will become one of the Dune universe's most powerful institutions. 

Unlike the cold, manipulative order of Frank Herbert’s original novels, here the Sisterhood emerges from necessity, camaraderie, and survival. Raquella Berto-Anirul, the Sisterhood’s leader, imbues the order with purpose and integrity, even as she engages in morally ambiguous practices, such as using forbidden computers to catalog family genetic information. 

Raquella’s efforts are acts of rebellion against the Butlerian purists, setting the Bene Gesserit on a path of quiet defiance that will ultimately define their methods.

Through Raquella’s character, Herbert and Anderson explore the theme of legacy and the moral cost of preserving it, showing that power often demands uncomfortable choices in the pursuit of higher goals.

Another thematic cornerstone of the novel lies in the struggle for knowledge and identity, particularly within the Mentat School led by Gilbertus Albans.

Gilbertus’s attempts to hide his robotic mentor, Erasmus, from the watchful eye of the Butlerians reveal a complex internal conflict. The Mentats’ pursuit of knowledge is marked by a paradox: they are the very embodiment of human potential, yet their existence is perilously close to violating the anti-machine principles of their society. The Mentats’ struggle to thrive under Butlerian scrutiny underscores the theme of intellectual persecution, and in Gilbertus, the authors create a character wrestling with his identity as both human and machine learner. His journey is one of navigating treacherous waters, questioning how much of humanity’s legacy can be retained without the technologies that once empowered it.

Equally compelling is the portrayal of the Harkonnen and Atreides families, whose blood feud exemplifies the theme of generational trauma. Vorian Atreides and the disgraced Harkonnens, exemplified by Valya Harkonnen’s determination to restore her family’s honor, represent two paths in the face of loss and disgrace. Their stories ask whether one’s destiny is determined by heritage or choice. Vorian’s exile and the Harkonnen’s humble existence on Lankiveil show that family legacy is both a burden and a motivator.

Through these familial arcs, Herbert and Anderson explore how individuals and families attempt to shape their identities while shackled to their pasts, a poignant exploration of heritage in a universe that prizes bloodline and legacy above all else.

The anti-technology fervor of the Butlerian movement, led by Torondo, touches on a theme that feels more relevant today than ever: the dangers of populism and zealotry. Torondo, a populist dictator in every sense, utilizes fear and charisma to incite the masses against any whisper of advanced technology. His rise highlights humanity’s susceptibility to charismatic leaders promising simple solutions to complex problems. 

Torondo’s character reminds readers of the seductive nature of fanaticism, with promises that are ultimately empty yet devastatingly effective. This portrayal is both a caution and a reminder that humanity’s instinctual need for purpose can often blind it to reason, making it vulnerable to leaders who exploit rather than uplift.

Finally, Sisterhood of Dune explores the intersection of religious fervor and political power. The Emperor’s strategic use of the Orange Catholic Bible’s release to quell unrest reveals the complex relationship between religion and the state. The religious undertones and the reinterpretation of ancient texts for political gains emphasize the manipulation of faith as a means of control, asking readers to consider the ethics of institutionalizing belief for the sake of order. 

Salvador’s eventual downfall illustrates that exploiting faith as a tool of authority is fraught with risks, especially when that faith becomes the only weapon left to both oppressors and the oppressed.

The themes in Sisterhood of Dune seamlessly connect to Frank Herbert's original Dune universe, weaving a deeper understanding of the ideological roots and institutions that will shape the future struggles on Arrakis. At its core, Sisterhood of Dune builds on Herbert's central examination of humanity’s relationship with power, technology, and ecological responsibility. 

The Butlerian anti-technology fervor echoes Herbert's cautionary tales about humanity's dependency on machines and presages the technological puritanism and selective manipulation of genetics that the Bene Gesserit, Mentats, and Spacing Guild later employ.

Similarly, the Sisterhood’s early ethical compromises and breeding program reflect Herbert’s complex portrayal of the Bene Gesserit’s role in human affairs—foreshadowing their pivotal influence over centuries.

This novel enriches Herbert’s theme of fanaticism as a double-edged sword, with Torondo’s zealotry mirroring later figures like Paul Atreides and the cult of Muad’Dib. By delving into these foundational conflicts, Sisterhood of Dune not only expands the lore but intensifies Herbert's original exploration of humanity’s unending battle between free will, the allure of messianic power, and the consequences of ideologically driven control over society and nature.

-

Sisterhood of Dune serves as the foundational narrative and inspiration for the television series Dune: Prophecy, which explores the origins of iconic institutions like the Bene Gesserit, Mentats, and the Spacing Guild. As a starting point, the novel delves into the turbulent post-Butlerian Jihad era, where anti-technology fervor and new power struggles begin to shape the Imperium's future. This background enriches the series, bringing to life the early ideological conflicts and ambitions that set the stage for the political and spiritual intrigues central to Frank Herbert’s original Dune saga.

Leave a Comment

Silo: The final episode of season one explained

The season finale of Silo masterfully fractures the myth of sanctuary that this underground haven clings to, peeling away layers of secrecy that choke its inhabitants.

When Juliette Nichols, Rebecca Ferguson’s raw-boned, no-nonsense engineer-turned-sheriff, is cast outside, the series steps out of claustrophobic corridors and into the void, with a gasping intensity that recalls the post-apocalyptic dread of The Road or Children of Men.

What she encounters beyond the airlock is less a revelation of freedom than a plummet into existential bleakness, one that redefines Silo’s dystopian roots.

It’s not freedom; it’s a grimmer cage.

Juliette's final moments in the Silo are as disorienting as they are crucial. Bracing against her fate, she is forced to confront Bernard, the show’s sinisterly bureaucratic mayor (Tim Robbins, War of the Worlds), who turns her cleaning sentence into a moral riddle.

 

Bernard is part Orwellian authority, part pragmatist, wielding his control over the Silo with a menacingly gentle touch, promising her leniency for her loved ones if she accepts this public punishment. And by sending her out, Bernard preserves not only his control but also the facade of the Silo as a hermetic safehouse against a hellish outside.

But Juliette’s departure cracks that facade for herself and the viewers alike.

As she steps outside, Silo rips into its grand illusion—quite literally—in the form of an ocular trick designed to pacify. The helmet display conjures a luscious, habitable world: blue skies, greenery, even birds flitting across a pristine horizon.

This artificial projection lulls its victims into one last moment of obedience, compelling them to "clean" the sensor, reaffirming the illusion for everyone left behind. The repeated display pattern, the same hopeful, lush world, is a calculated cruelty meant to keep the Silo’s lie alive.

But Juliette, noticing the birds’ repeated, programmed movement (which keen viewers can observe themselves in prior episodes), unearths the truth in a moment of profound horror.

It’s the heat tape, ironically, that lets her see past this deception.

This seemingly innocuous material, a mechanic’s staple in the world below, turns from mundane supply to lifeline. Harriet Walter’s character Walker, Juliette’s mentor, recognizes that the standard-issue tape—designed to fail—is the true cause of death for the condemned.

 

Walker's homemade, industrial-grade tape is a quiet revolution wrapped around Juliette’s suit, allowing her to survive the trek up the hill and past the display’s lies. The decision to trust Juliette’s life to tape recalls the symbolic poignancy of a minor object taking on monumental meaning, a detail Silo hides in plain sight until its significance detonates in the finale.

Juliette’s survival goes beyond defiance; it sparks curiosity and rebellion in others.

By refusing to clean, by cresting the hill to see what lies beyond the display, she becomes the unwitting Flamekeeper that Gloria foreshadowed.

Meanwhile, Robert Sims (Common), Bernard’s enforcer, finds his own allegiance at a breaking point. While outwardly a believer in the Silo’s strict protocol, Sims reveals a subtle internal fracture. His confusion as Bernard mutters, “She knows,” at Juliette’s realization hints at an incomplete awareness of the true machinations within. Sims embodies a brutal paradox—both enforcer and victim of the system he perpetuates, a state apparatchik who may soon discover the extent of the lies he’s built his life around.

Bernard, the icy, calculating overseer, holds a key to one of the show's greater enigmas—the "18" marked on his cryptic access key, linking their Silo to a broader network of isolated worlds. When he uses this key in the finale, viewers are left to wonder:

Is Bernard himself a pawn in an even grander scheme? 

His loyalty, or perhaps his fear, to preserve the Silo’s order suggests that his power is conditional, dependent on following orders from an unseen authority. The number “18” pulls back the curtain, revealing that this oppressive microcosm is one of many, part of a network engineered to keep humanity in stasis.

As Juliette presses further, her encounter with the desolation beyond reaffirms the finality of her journey. What she sees is haunting: a toxic landscape devoid of life, a stark contrast to the illusion in her helmet. The city skyline that punctuates this barren horizon suggests a past civilization decimated, a monument to humanity’s self-inflicted apocalypse. This is no paradise lost; it is a vision of ruin, a tomb that confirms the Silo’s narrative of the world above.

What’s chilling, though, is that the Silo was right—just not in the way its inhabitants were led to believe. The outside air is indeed toxic, a hostile wasteland unfit for life. Juliette’s clarity in realizing this unfiltered truth while grappling with the helmet’s artificial projection—one last visual lie—is perhaps the show’s most philosophical moment.

It’s not only a commentary on survival but also on the existential cost of knowing, the unbearable price of truth.

Silo season one ends not with closure but with an expansion of its oppressive world. Juliette's act of rebellion—by seeing, by refusing to comply—is a spark in the powder keg of a far larger conspiracy. It leaves audiences to question:

Who built the Silo? 

And more urgently, who controls it?

Leave a Comment

The Key Themes of Dune: Prophecy

At the heart of Dune: Prophecy lies a meditation on the nature of power, both overt and subtle. 

The Bene Gesserit Sisterhood wields influence not through force but through manipulation and psychological mastery. This theme resonates with the broader Dune lore, where power often lies not in direct control but in the ability to shape the thoughts and decisions of others. 

Valya Harkonnen’s journey as Mother Superior embodies this approach, as she deftly navigates the political currents of the Imperium. Her power, like that of the Sisterhood at large, is quiet yet formidable, shaped by the ability to see possibilities, plant ideas, and shape outcomes without the need for violence. 

Dune: Prophecy examines how power can be wielded in silence, casting light on the hidden, manipulative arts that form the foundation of Bene Gesserit influence.

Prophecy and Predestination

In the Dune universe, prophecy is a double-edged sword. Dune: Prophecy leans heavily into this concept, depicting how the Sisterhood’s actions are often shaped—and sometimes hindered—by their own foreknowledge of what’s to come. Mother Raquella’s prediction of a future tyrant who will rise against the Sisterhood casts a shadow over Valya’s every decision. 

This theme ties into the broader Dune saga’s fascination with destiny and the burden of foreknowledge, as seen with Paul Atreides in Herbert’s novels. 

In Dune: Prophecy, prophecy is both a guide and a cage, a motivating force that propels Valya and the Sisterhood forward but also a trap that limits their freedom. The series invites viewers to consider how the belief in destiny can constrain as much as it empowers.

Gender and Agency in a Hierarchical World

Dune: Prophecy brings the gender dynamics of Dune into sharper focus, highlighting the Bene Gesserit’s complex role in an overwhelmingly male-dominated Imperium. The Sisterhood’s covert power reveals the limits placed on women within the Imperium’s political structure, where overt authority remains the domain of emperors, dukes, and other male figures. 

In response, the Bene Gesserit develop their own systems of agency, mastering arts of influence that men overlook or underestimate. The series underscores the theme of women finding agency within restriction, turning limitations into assets. This focus adds a poignant layer to the narrative, showing that in a world where direct power is denied, indirect influence can become a weapon just as potent as any blade.

Humanity’s Wariness of Technology

Set in the aftermath of the Butlerian Jihad—a pivotal event where humanity rose against “thinking machines”—Dune: Prophecy is steeped in a cultural fear of artificial intelligence. The Imperium’s prohibition of thinking machines shapes not only its technological development but its social fabric, influencing how knowledge, power, and labor are organized. This aversion to AI has led to a culture that prizes human potential and, in particular, to the Bene Gesserit’s focus on honing the mind and body to near-superhuman levels. 

This wariness echoes throughout the show, creating a society that values mastery over self rather than mastery over machines. The series probes this theme through characters like Desmond Hart, who flirts with the forbidden line of technology, highlighting the ever-present fear that humanity’s creations might one day overtake them.

Transformation and the Path to Self-Mastery

A recurring theme in Dune: Prophecy is the Bene Gesserit’s path of self-mastery, a grueling journey of mental and physical training that allows them to become Truthsayers, visionaries, and masters of the Voice. This theme of transformation goes beyond physical capability; it’s about honing one’s self to become an instrument of control and influence. 

The acolytes’ rigorous training, pushed to their physical and mental limits, reflects Herbert’s larger idea of self-mastery as the only path to true freedom. By controlling their bodies, emotions, and thoughts, the Bene Gesserit believe they are freed from manipulation—a claim that is perhaps ironic given their own practices. 

In Dune: Prophecy, the path to mastery is as much about freedom from external control as it is about the responsibility that comes with such power.

The Tension Between Loyalty and Individual Ambition

Dune: Prophecy explores the tension between individual desires and loyalty to the Sisterhood, a theme encapsulated in Valya Harkonnen’s ambition and the internal conflicts faced by her acolytes. The Bene Gesserit’s strict code emphasizes loyalty to the Sisterhood above all, but the personal ambitions of characters often conflict with this creed. Valya’s ruthless drive to see her visions realized sometimes jeopardizes the Sisterhood, revealing how individual ambition can become a double-edged sword. 

This theme parallels the Bene Gesserit’s belief in collective survival, raising questions about the cost of personal power within an organization built on shared purpose. 

It’s a powerful reminder that loyalty, when mixed with unchecked ambition, can lead to fractures within even the most disciplined societies.

Legacy and the Weight of History

The weight of history permeates Dune: Prophecy, reflecting Dune’s larger preoccupation with the cycles of power and the scars of past conflicts. The Bene Gesserit are not just living in the present; they are carrying the knowledge and traditions passed down since the Butlerian Jihad, shaping their every decision in light of historical experience. 

Valya’s Harkonnen lineage is a constant reminder of the past and the burdens it brings, tying her actions to both her family’s and the Sisterhood’s legacies. This theme enriches the series by framing individual actions as part of a larger continuum, asking viewers to consider how the weight of history can both guide and restrict those who carry it.

The Inescapable Reach of Fate

Finally, Dune: Prophecy delves into the inexorable pull of fate, a theme that resonates through every choice and every plot twist. Valya’s decisions to fulfill or defy prophecy highlight the tension between free will and preordained destiny. In the Dune universe, fate is both a cosmic and personal force, dictating the lives of individuals and the fate of entire empires. 

Dune: Prophecy captures this struggle, portraying the Bene Gesserit’s use of prophecy as a way to gain control over the uncontrollable, to see the future as both a map and a warning. This theme serves as a reminder that in the world of Dune, destiny is never just a future to arrive at—it is a force that shapes the present, one that characters cannot escape no matter how fiercely they try.

Leave a Comment

Dune: Prophecy > Review

The Dune universe has always felt boundless, a sprawling vision of the future where political intrigue, mysticism, and cosmic dread converge across endless desert sands. The arrival of Dune: Prophecy marks a significant new chapter, one that digs into the scarcely explored depths of the Bene Gesserit Sisterhood, pulling back the veil on the mysterious order that’s quietly dictated events from the shadows for millennia. 

Set more than 10,000 years before the saga of Paul Atreides unfolds, the six-episode prequel series opens a portal into the formative years of the Imperium and a galaxy still haunted by the scars of the Butlerian Jihad—a war against “thinking machines” that reshaped human society in profound ways. This is Dune re-imagined as historical epic and metaphysical odyssey, bringing the Sisterhood into the kind of brutal, hypnotic focus that could only have thrived in the age of prestige television.

Unlike the vast deserts of Arrakis that dominate Herbert’s novels and Villeneuve’s films, Dune: Prophecy roots itself in the cold, forbidding environments of Wallach IX, the Bene Gesserit homeworld, and the imperial power seat on Salusa Secundus. There’s no mistaking that the series owes a debt to Game of Thrones for its palace intrigue and power plays, but it’s far from a mere imitation. 

Rather, the story draws its intensity from a philosophical tension unique to Dune: the line between control and destiny, the risk and reward of prophesy, and the unfathomable power held by those willing to sit in shadows. At the heart of it all stands Mother Superior Valya Harkonnen (Emily Watson), a cunning leader whose quiet determination and relentless ambition aim to elevate the Sisterhood and secure its influence within the sprawling Imperium. This is no rise-to-power arc but a meditation on the costs of influence.

Adapted from Sisterhood of Dune by Brian Herbert and Kevin J. Anderson, Dune: Prophecy takes liberties with its source material, yet it remains true to the book’s underlying tensions and vast, complex lore. The Butlerian Jihad, the great war against artificial intelligence that banned “thinking machines” and rewrote the moral code of civilization, looms over this narrative like a dark specter. In the vacuum left by the demise of these machines, new power structures emerge—paramount among them the Sisterhood. Led by Valya Harkonnen, the Sisterhood begins its ascent, quietly embedding itself within the Imperium, while acolytes undergo rigorous mental and physical training to prepare for their roles as truth-sayers, manipulators, and future prophets. We find ourselves in a time when their legendary powers, such as the controlling Voice, are in nascent form, and the breeding project to create the Kwisatz Haderach is still a dream on the horizon.

Valya’s dominance over the Sisterhood is hardly a given, and her journey is shaped by those around her, notably her sister Tula (Olivia Williams, The Postman + The Sith Sense), whose quiet loyalty and inner conflict lend the narrative a tragic undercurrent. Together, the Harkonnen sisters embody Dune’s ceaseless interplay of power and vulnerability, often more allies than family in a universe that requires brutal pragmatism over kinship.

Watson and Williams bring a near-mythic intensity to their roles, managing to convey the vastness of this world not through sweeping monologues but through glances and whispered exchanges that imply an ocean of secrets. Through them, we see how the Sisterhood operates—never with a hammer, but with a scalpel—finessing outcomes that shape the destiny of empires.

As viewers follow the Sisterhood’s machinations within the courts of Salusa Secundus, Dune: Prophecy strikes an arresting balance between palace intrigue and metaphysical dread. Emperor Javicco Corrino (Mark Strong, John Carter of Mars) struggles to keep control of his empire while the forces of Arrakis loom over him. Meanwhile, the charismatic yet ruthless soldier Desmond Hart (Travis Fimmel, Vikings, Raised by Wolves) brings an unsettling energy to the emperor’s court, further agitating tensions with the Sisterhood and Corrino’s daughter, Princess Ynez (Sarah-Sofie Boussnina). 

This tangled web of political factions, bolstered by ancient prophecies and deep-seated grudges, provides the show’s pulse, while the tension between the Sisterhood’s hidden hand and the emperor’s overt authority heightens each scene with anticipation.

One of Dune: Prophecy’s most intriguing elements is how it layers its backstory with the mythic horror of the Butlerian Jihad. This isn’t just filler lore; it’s a reminder of humanity’s encounter with its own ambition, and the psychic scars it left behind in the form of prohibitions against artificial intelligence. We see this cultural trauma refracted through Valya’s ruthless adherence to tradition and Desmond Hart’s peculiar relationship with forbidden technology. 

Though rarely mentioned explicitly, the war’s aftermath is evident in everything from the rigid hierarchy of the Imperium to the Sisterhood’s insistence on mastering the human mind and body to fill the void once dominated by machines. It’s a shadow over the entire series, a reminder that the power wielded in Dune is always a double-edged sword.

While the sands of Arrakis dominate much of the Dune universe, Dune: Prophecy bravely shifts its gaze to other pivotal worlds, specifically Wallach IX and Salusa Secundus. These planets, with their bleak, cold atmospheres, make a stark contrast to the desert sun and spice-laden air of Arrakis, yet they are equally integral to the story. Through the glittering imperial palace on Salusa Secundus and the austere Sisterhood library on Wallach IX, the series brings to life a galaxy where even the landscapes seem to echo the harshness and gravity of its conflicts. 

Tom Meyer’s production design teams with Bojana Nikitovic’s costume work to conjure spaces that feel lived-in and lore-bound, imbuing every veil, corridor, and throne room with the heavy, inevitable march of history. This world-building doesn’t just satisfy fans; it demonstrates the sheer breadth of Herbert’s universe.

At the center of Dune: Prophecy lies a revelation of the Sisterhood, not merely as mystics but as individuals negotiating personal ambitions and the Sisterhood’s future under Valya Harkonnen’s guidance. The Bene Gesserit here are not yet the fully realized force depicted in Herbert’s novels or Villeneuve’s films. They’re still grappling with their identity, balancing loyalty and individual desire in a universe that will not yield to them easily. 

Their rigorous training—the mental and physical crucibles that acolytes endure—adds a ritualistic, almost monastic quality to the series, as they learn to wield powers of truth-saying and body control, preparing for the political chess game that is life in the Imperium. We see, with each grueling trial and whispered lesson, the seeds of the Bene Gesserit we know, and the women who will one day transform this sisterhood into a force that can bend emperors to their will.

Through Valya Harkonnen’s ascendance, Dune: Prophecy also revisits the infamous Harkonnen lineage, transforming it from the one-dimensional house of villains familiar to fans of the films into a complex narrative of survival, betrayal, and raw ambition. Valya is no caricature; she’s a tactician, haunted by a family history marred by the Butlerian Jihad and her ancestors' disgrace. Her sister Tula, gentler yet no less resolved, offers an intriguing foil, adding complexity to a lineage that will later be embodied in the infamous Baron Harkonnen. 

This series sheds light on the humanity, even the honor, woven into the Harkonnen name before it became synonymous with ruthless tyranny. By grounding their motivations in family loyalty, political necessity, and personal ambition, Dune: Prophecy brings to life a part of Dune that often lives in the shadows.

At its core, Dune: Prophecy is about destiny—a theme that saturates every corner of Herbert’s universe. The series teases out the role of prophecy in shaping the Sisterhood’s decisions and the Imperium’s political landscape, balancing the question of free will against the weight of ancient predictions. Valya’s relentless drive to fulfill her vision, to secure the Sisterhood’s legacy, reverberates through each storyline, casting the characters as both architects and prisoners of fate. Her fierce belief in the prophecy from Mother Raquella, predicting a tyrant who will crush the Sisterhood, is both her motivation and her potential undoing. 

In this way, Dune: Prophecy explores how prophecy can inspire or imprison, a fitting parallel to the wider Dune mythos and its eternal struggle between fate and autonomy.

Dune: Prophecy succeeds in its mission, leaving us with an Imperium rich in both mystery and meaning, a new standard in sci-fi television. It’s a thrill to know that, even after decades, Dune still has secrets to uncover and stories to tell.

Leave a Comment

Finch (2021) - Themes of Survival, Legacy, and the Human Spirit

Finch (2021), directed by Miguel Sapochnik (Repomen, Game of Thrones), combines elements of post-apocalyptic survival and human emotion, the need for legacy.

The film, starring Tom Hanks (Cloud Atlas), tells the story of Finch, the last surviving human on Earth, who, in the wake of an environmental catastrophe, strives to protect his dog, Goodyear, and teach his robot creation, Jeff, to care for the dog after his inevitable death. Set against a barren landscape, the film’s exploration of the end of humanity touches on themes of survival, legacy, human connection, and the role of technology.

While Finch unfolds as a road trip across a desolate world, it’s much more a profound meditation on the fragility of life and what it means to leave something behind. This essay will explore the key themes of survival, human connection, legacy, and technology in Finch, arguing that the film is ultimately a hopeful, philosophical reflection on humanity’s enduring spirit, even in the face of extinction.

Survival and the Fragility of Human Life

At its core, Finch is a film about survival in a dying world. The theme of survival is central to the narrative, not just as a matter of physical endurance but also as a means to ensure that the values and knowledge of the human race are not lost. Finch is the lone survivor in a world devastated by environmental collapse. As he faces the certainty of his own death due to illness, Finch is tasked with preparing for a future beyond his own life.

The fragility of human life is made explicit in Finch’s declining health and his efforts to teach Jeff how to care for Goodyear. This relationship between man and machine goes beyond mere survival tactics; it becomes a testament to the human need to protect those we love, even in the face of an inevitable, uncontrollable fate. The film’s bleak landscapes and the harsh conditions the characters endure emphasize just how precarious human life is in a world that has already moved past its prime.

Sapochnik’s direction and the film's visual style underscore this fragility, with wide shots of desolate environments highlighting the smallness and vulnerability of Finch as he makes his way through the world. 

 

Human Connection and Companionship

In Finch, the theme of human connection is explored through the relationships that form in an otherwise isolated and desolate world. Finch, the last surviving human, shares his life with only his dog Goodyear and, as the film progresses, the AI robot Jeff. In this broken, apocalyptic setting, the film emphasizes that companionship is not just a luxury but a fundamental need for survival. 

As Finch faces the inevitable end of his life, the film explores how these relationships—though unconventional—are what sustain him emotionally and psychologically, offering a sense of meaning and purpose in a world devoid of human interaction.

The relationship between Finch and Goodyear serves as the emotional anchor of the film. 

The dog is not just a pet but a symbol of the old world—loyal, familiar, and dependable. In the early stages of the film, Goodyear is Finch's sole companion, and their bond is one of mutual dependence. Goodyear’s presence provides Finch with a sense of stability and emotional connection in a world where human bonds no longer exist. 

As Finch’s health deteriorates, his need for Goodyear's companionship grows even more pronounced, and it becomes evident that he cannot fully rely on the dog alone to secure the future. This is where Jeff, the robot, enters the narrative. While initially created as a tool for survival, Jeff’s role in the film gradually shifts from a functional machine to an evolving form of companionship. Finch’s attempt to teach Jeff human qualities, such as empathy and emotional understanding, becomes a central aspect of the film.

What’s particularly striking in Finch is the way the film juxtaposes the relationships between Finch, Goodyear, and Jeff. While Finch’s bond with Goodyear is based on years of mutual companionship, his relationship with Jeff evolves out of necessity and the understanding that human connection, even with a machine, can take on unexpected and deeply meaningful forms. Jeff’s development throughout the film reflects the broader theme of humanity's need for connection, suggesting that even in a post-apocalyptic world where human life has all but disappeared, the longing for connection remains a fundamental aspect of survival.

 

Legacy and Passing Down Knowledge

At the heart of Finch lies the theme of legacy—specifically, the desire to leave something behind after death. In a world on the brink of extinction, where Finch is one of the few last surviving humans, the concept of legacy takes on profound significance. 

As Finch faces his own mortality due to a terminal illness, he is driven by an urgent need to prepare for the future, not just for his dog Goodyear, but also for the robot, Jeff, whom he has created to serve as a caretaker. This act of preparing Jeff to care for Goodyear represents Finch’s attempt to pass down the responsibility of life itself, ensuring that there is continuity even after humanity is gone (in this sense George Clooney's Midnight Sky echoes similar sentiment).

Finch’s legacy is not one of traditional wealth or status but of knowledge, love, and survival instincts. In teaching Jeff how to care for Goodyear, Finch is also imparting lessons about empathy, responsibility, and compassion—values that will guide the robot in fulfilling his role as a caretaker. Finch's struggle to communicate these values to Jeff highlights the deeper philosophical inquiry into what it means to leave behind a legacy in a world where human civilization has collapsed.

 

The transfer of responsibility for Goodyear to Jeff is a significant moment in the film, one that marks the culmination of Finch’s life’s work. He realizes that his legacy will not be about the preservation of the human race, but rather the preservation of care and responsibility, even through a machine. This dynamic evokes the idea that the most lasting aspects of humanity—the ability to love, nurture, and protect—can be passed down, not only through human descendants but through other forms of life, even if those forms are artificial.

The final scenes of the film, where Jeff takes on the responsibility of Goodyear’s care after Finch’s death, encapsulate the idea of legacy as a living, evolving force. In a sense, Finch’s legacy is not simply something that exists after his death—it is something that will continue to grow and transform. Jeff’s capacity to care for Goodyear and to continue Finch’s mission of survival speaks to the idea that the true measure of a legacy is how it continues to impact the world even when the original creator is no longer present.

-

If you enjoyed Finch and are intrigued by the emotional bond between a human and a robot, I highly recommend exploring these films that similarly delve into human-robot relationships. 

Chappie (2015) explores the journey of a sentient robot struggling to understand the world around him, offering a poignant look at the complexities of AI and human connection. 

Bicentennial Man (1999) follows the evolution of an android who gradually becomes more human over two centuries, highlighting themes of love, identity, and mortality. 

Ex Machina (2014) presents a gripping exploration of artificial intelligence, focusing on the ethical dilemmas and emotional interactions between a human programmer and a highly advanced robot named Ava. 

Short Circuit (1986) offers a lighter take on the genre, with a robot gaining sentience and forming a bond with a human, leading to a heartwarming adventure about friendship and discovery. 

These films, much like Finch, provide compelling narratives that question the nature of consciousness, connection, and what it means to be truly "alive."

Leave a Comment

Themes of Civil War - written and directed by Alex Garland (2024)

Filmmaker Alex Garland has a long way since he first hit a note with his script for The Beach.

Throughout the last 20 years Garland has had a steering hand in many classic gems of films - the pitch-perfect Dredd, the scary bear movie - Annihilation, the overlooked Men and the A.I. classic of Ex Machina.

Produced by A24 films, Alex Garland's film Civil War (2024) explores a near-future America divided by a devastating internal conflict, taking a deep dive into themes of political disintegration, the ethics of journalism, and the chaotic fog of war. Set against the backdrop of a nation fractured between an authoritarian federal government and secessionist factions, Garland constructs a narrative that refrains from clear political affiliations, instead focusing on the universal descent into chaos and the moral ambiguity that follows.

So hardly states that are united then...

It emphasizes the importance of journalism in such contexts, underscoring the role of the media in exposing truths during war and holding power accountable.

One of the film’s primary themes is the breakdown of political and societal structures. 

Garland avoids a simplistic portrayal of the red versus blue divide, opting instead to illustrate a complex and murky conflict where the motives and ideologies of both sides are unclear, even to those fighting in it. This lack of clear political stances emphasizes the absurdity and tragedy of civil wars, where factions fight without a coherent understanding of their goals, highlighting the senseless violence driven by deeply entrenched divisions in society.

Another critical theme is the role and ethics of journalism in war. 

The story is seen through the eyes of war journalists, who strive to document the conflict while grappling with their professional duty and personal trauma. Kirsten Dunst’s character, Lee, exemplifies this struggle; she is a seasoned war photographer facing an existential crisis over her work's impact, or lack thereof. This theme reflects Garland's commentary on the often-questioned objectivity and moral quandaries of the press in conflict zones, where the lines between documenting and influencing events are blurred.

Garland also delves into the psychological toll of war on individuals, particularly journalists on the front lines. The characters face intense stress and trauma, manifesting in different ways. For instance, Lee's emotional detachment contrasts sharply with the reckless thrill-seeking of her colleague Joel, portraying a spectrum of coping mechanisms against the relentless backdrop of violence. 

This focus on personal struggles offers a raw and intimate perspective on the broader chaos of the conflict, showing how war alters one's psyche and distorts moral judgment.

The film further critiques the spectacle of political power and its downfall. The portrayal of the President as a despotic figure who manipulates fear and division, yet becomes a pitiful figure hiding from the advancing rebels, underlines the transient and performative nature of political authority. This theme resonates with historical instances of collapsing regimes and highlights the inevitable vulnerability of even the most powerful leaders when societal structures crumble.

Lastly, Civil War serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of extreme polarization and the fragility of democratic institutions. The ambiguous motives of the warring factions suggest that the specifics of the political divide are less significant than the fact of division itself, pointing to a broader commentary on the contemporary political landscape. 

Garland uses this dystopian vision to reflect the current anxieties around democracy's decline and the societal consequences of entrenched partisanship, making the film a relevant and thought-provoking piece on the potential future of American society.

Through its themes, Civil War challenges viewers to contemplate the cyclical nature of conflict and the human capacity for self-destruction, making it a haunting exploration of the complexities underlying civil strife in the modern age.

Leave a Comment

Does the 1984 Dune movie by David Lynch hold up as a cult classic?

David Lynch's 1984 adaptation of Frank Herbert's "Dune" occupies a unique and somewhat paradoxical position.

Upon its release, the film was met with a lukewarm critical reception and fell short of box office success, mired by its perceived 'narrative incoherence' and vast deviations from its universally acclaimed source material.

The director himself appears to rue what could have been.

Yet, over the years, "Dune" has transcended its initial reception to achieve a cult status among a devoted fanbase. This transformation from a commercial disappointment to a cult classic underscores the film's enduring appeal and the fascination it continues to inspire within certain segments of the audience.

The film's journey from its troubled production to its place in the heart of cult cinema enthusiasts illustrates the complex relationship between artistic vision, audience expectations, and the unpredictable alchemy that sometimes grants a film a second life, cherished for the very quirks and flaws that once drew ire.

We can explore the elements that make this film a subject of endless fascination and debate among fans and critics alike. The history of a film's production can add to the measure of a film's cult status.

 
"Dune" stands as a testament to the challenges and rewards of bringing a beloved, dense novel to the silver screen, showcasing Lynch's unique vision amid the broader landscape of science fiction cinema

Ridley Scott was initially lined up to direct "Dune" but left the project presumably in favor of Bladerunner, leading to David Lynch's involvement (having turned down the Return of the Jedi gig from George Lucas himself). 

Years prior, Alejandro Jodorowsky had tried to make the film too. 

Lynch, known for his unique artistic vision (The Elephant Man, Eraserhead), was an unconventional choice for a sprawling sci-fi epic. His approach to filmmaking, characterized by surreal imagery and complex narrative structures, was both a cause for excitement and concern. 

Legend has it Lynch’s initial rough pass came in at four hours, with an intent to get it to three with post-production added. However, he did not have final cut privilege which meant his film was heavily edited down, which greatly influenced his feelings toward the film.

 
"Dune" was a monumental task in terms of production design and special effects. The film's visual elements, from the baroque architecture of the palaces to the desolate expanses of Arrakis, were brought to life through meticulous set design and innovative practical effects.

 
The giant sandworms of Arrakis, crucial to the plot and the planet's ecosystem, were a particular challenge and triumph of practical effects, creating memorable moments that still impress.

The film's soundtrack, composed by the rock band Toto with contributions from Brian Eno, is a significant departure from traditional orchestral scores found in epic cinema. Its electronic synthesizer-based themes added an otherworldly texture to the film's atmosphere, aligning well with Lynch's vision of a distant future.

Lynch's use of voice-over narration to express characters' internal thoughts was an attempt to remain faithful to the introspective nature of Herbert's novel. This method, while criticized for its exposition-heavy delivery (recall the lengthy introduction sequence with Princes Irulan), was a bold attempt to translate the novel's complex narrative and philosophical themes to the screen.

It would certainly have helped a viewer who had not read the novel. 

Princes Irrulan

Significant deviations from the source material, such as the Weirding Modules replacing the novel's "weirding way" of hand-to-hand combat, were points of contention. 

Indeed, the final 2 hour cut film had to condense a lot of plot and character moments.

Upon its release, "Dune" was met with mixed reviews and underwhelming box office performance. However, it has since cultivated a dedicated following who appreciate its ambition, visual spectacle, and the distinct mark of its director.

The release of the two Denis Villenuueve Dune films has also garnered new attention for the Dune of '84.

Does the film hold up on review?

In a sense yes, there is a lot to enjoy and the more Sting runss around in blue space attire, the more the film can lean into taking itself not too seriously.

That said, "Dune" has secured its status as a cult classic within the sci-fi genre, a feat attributable to a confluence of factors. 

Alongside memorable performances from a diverse cast, including Kyle MacLachlan and Sting as Feyd-Rautha Harkonnen, the film can further cement its place in the hearts of a devoted fanbase. Moreover, the existence of multiple versions, including a controversial extended cut disowned by Lynch, has spurred ongoing debate and analysis. 

Despite its initial mixed reception, "Dune" is celebrated as a cult status movie for its world-building, thematic depth, and the enduring impact it has had on the sci-fi genre.

Leave a Comment