07 April 2025

The Last of Us: Season 2 Review - a strong front, needing to find its way home

We know what you did 5 winters ago, Joel...

Season 2 of The Last of Us opens not with a bang, but with the echo of choices made in blood. From the outset, it makes clear this isn’t about survival anymore—it’s about consequences. Joel’s decision at the end of Season 1 to rescue Ellie from the Firefly hospital, killing dozens in the process and lying to her about it, becomes the narrative engine for everything that follows. 

This season confronts the ripple effect of that moment. It doesn’t just ask whether Joel did the right thing—it asks what “right” even means in a world that’s already ended. The show trades the physical road trip of Season 1 for an emotional spiral, and while that shift is bold, it’s also disorienting. Viewers expecting more of the same will be thrown, because Season 2 doesn’t hold your hand.

 It shoves you into the dark and dares you to keep walking.

The Last of Us: Season 2 Review

Pedro Pascal’s Joel is quieter this time, more haunted. He’s living with the weight of a lie that both saved and doomed Ellie. You see it in his eyes—he’s afraid of her, afraid for her, and most of all, terrified that she’ll find out. Pascal’s performance is restrained but loaded with guilt, especially in early scenes set in Jackson, Wyoming, where Joel tries to find some version of peace. Bella Ramsey’s Ellie is still raw, still sharp, but something is broken now.

She's angrier, darker.

Her teenage sarcasm has curdled into something brittle. The show tries to sell the passage of five years between seasons, but Ramsey’s portrayal doesn’t quite bridge that emotional gap. Ellie looks older, fights harder, but too often still talks like the kid she was. This matters because the whole season rests on Ellie’s moral collapse. Ramsey is brilliant in grief and confusion, but when the story calls for rage, for real menace, there’s a sense that the performance is playing catch-up with the character.


Enter Abby, played by Kaitlyn Dever, and with her comes the most controversial turn in both the game and the show. Abby’s arrival is immediate and unrelenting. She has a purpose, and it's vengeance. But in adapting her character for TV, the show loses some of the ambiguity that made her compelling in the game. The mystery is gone. We’re given her backstory, her motivations, and even her inner monologue upfront. In The Last of Us Part II, players are forced to reckon with Abby only after hating her for hours.

That structure built empathy by design. Here, the show seems scared we might not “get it,” so it tells us everything. What’s lost is the moral discomfort. The themes—revenge, justice, cycles of violence—are still present, but the adaptation plays it safer, less willing to alienate viewers. As a result, Abby feels less like a person and more like a concept.

Vengeance given a face, but not a soul.

And that brings us to the core theme of Season 2: the cycle. Violence begets violence. Love mutates into obsession. Redemption slips through bloodied hands. These aren’t new ideas, but the show digs in with a bleak intensity. Seattle, where most of the season unfolds, is painted as a city ruled by tribalism and ideology.

The Washington Liberation Front and the Seraphites (also known as Scars) represent opposing ends of the same ruinous spectrum. Militant order versus religious zealotry. But the show doesn’t dive deep into their philosophies or histories. Instead, they become set dressing for Ellie’s descent. This is a missed opportunity, especially since the game used these factions to explore how people cling to meaning after the fall. Still, the setting provides some unforgettable imagery.

Overgrown cities, rotting skyscrapers, and streets littered with the remnants of forgotten wars. Nature is reclaiming the world, but humans keep trying to burn it down again.

Where Season 1 was about connection—how people find each other in ruin—Season 2 is about isolation. Every character is pulling away. Joel and Ellie drift apart under the weight of unspoken truths. Ellie’s relationship with Dina is sweet, believable, and quietly tragic. It’s built on moments of affection that always feel like they’re about to be swallowed by dread. Isabela Merced is luminous. Funny, grounded, emotionally rich. Jesse, played by Young Mazino, adds heart to the early episodes, but like many characters this season, he’s underused.

Catherine O’Hara brings unexpected pathos as Gail, Jackson’s lone therapist. She’s a dry, incisive counterpoint to the show’s otherwise relentless despair. These moments of human connection are fleeting but vital. They remind us what’s at stake, even as the plot pulls us toward more violence, more revenge, more loss.

The storytelling structure of this season is ambitious but uneven. The timeline jumps around. A choice inherited from the game. But here it often feels jarring. Flashbacks interrupt rather than enhance. One episode is almost entirely set in the past. Beautifully performed but placed so awkwardly that it kills the forward momentum. Important character shifts happen in silence, offscreen, or in montage. It’s not that the narrative is confusing. It’s that it’s diluted. With only seven episodes, the show has less time to breathe. Emotional climaxes come too fast or too blunt. A major death happens amid chaos, overshadowed by an epic battle sequence that, while technically dazzling, feels like a tonal mismatch. This isn’t a story about glory. It’s about grief. And that grief gets lost in the noise.

Still, The Last of Us remains an aesthetic powerhouse. The production design is impeccable. Fungal-infected tunnels. Hauntingly empty churches repurposed as military bases. The lighting is especially noteworthy. Tender moments glow with amber warmth. Horror is rendered in deep crimson or flickering firelight. The infected return in greater numbers this season. One jaw-dropping siege stands out as a true high point. But ironically, the more we see them, the less threatening they become. The real monsters, as always, are human.

And the show is clearest in its worldview when it strips away spectacle and lets its characters sit in the aftermath. One quiet scene of Ellie and Dina playing guitar says more about love, loss, and longing than any battle ever could.

Lore-wise, Season 2 expands the universe in smart, subtle ways. Jackson is given more texture. A functioning society with rules, politics, and its own moral rot. We meet characters like Isaac, who is given more depth here than in the game, though not enough to fully land. Religious factions, old world ideologies, and the echoes of FEDRA’s fall all hover at the edges.

The Fireflies are still a phantom presence, and their absence says as much about the world’s decline as their actions ever did. But while the show builds its setting with care, it often forgets to populate it with compelling, multi-dimensional lives. We get bits and pieces. Some stunning guest star turns. But we’re not allowed to linger long enough for these new faces to become more than background noise.

What truly separates The Last of Us from other post-apocalyptic dramas is its refusal to offer catharsis. There are no heroes here. Only people doing what they think is right and dealing with the wreckage. The game made you complicit in this.

The show, for better or worse, makes you a spectator. That distance can be frustrating, especially when the writing veers into over-explaining. Characters articulate their trauma rather than embody it. There’s a lack of trust in the audience’s ability to sit with ambiguity. Part II the game trusted that discomfort. The show tries to manage it. And in managing it, it loses some of its rawest power.

So where does this leave us? With a season that’s bold, brutal, and not entirely successful. A middle chapter with jagged edges and unresolved threads. That might frustrate some, but it also feels true to the spirit of the source material.

The world of The Last of Us was never about clean arcs or tidy conclusions. It was about surviving one more day. Physically. Emotionally. Morally.

And if Season 1 was about what we’ll do for love, Season 2 asks what happens when love turns to hate. When justice becomes vengeance. When the truth you cling to starts to rot. These aren’t questions the show answers yet.

But it knows how to ask them. Loud. Painful. Unforgettable.

Themes of Rogue One: A Star Wars Story (2016)

There’s a sharpness to Rogue One that doesn’t exist in any other Star Wars film. It’s stripped of myth, drained of prophecy, and mostly free of that generational, space-wizard baggage. What’s left is something more grounded—more human. This isn't about “chosen ones” or balancing the Force. It’s about the cost of resistance when no one is coming to save you.

Released in 2016 and directed by Gareth Edwards stomping on the heel of his Godzilla remake, Rogue One was the franchise’s first real gamble post-Disney acquisition (The Force Awakens was going to clean up no matter what). A standalone war film with a foregone conclusion. No Jedi. No Skywalkers (well, almost). But in place of iconography, it gave us something else: tension. Desperation. Characters scraping against moral edges just to claw out a fighting chance. 

The result? A Star Wars film that doesn’t just flirt with fatalism - it leans all the way in.

Edwards - alongside the uncredited script-shaping of Tony Gilroy - crafted a film that punches harder than it has any right to. It doesn't build a world so much as it weaponizes one. Every rusted panel and dusty bootprint reminds us this galaxy isn't magical. It's occupied. Rogue One gives us Star Wars by way of resistance cinema. Less space opera, more last stand.

Here, we break it down into five thematic cores. Not just what the film is about - but what it's saying, beneath the wreckage, beneath the triumphs. Because when the heroes don’t survive, the message has to.

themes of rogue one star wars

SACRIFICE & UNSUNG HEROISM

Sacrifice isn't romantic here. It’s not the noble self-detonation of a Jedi or the blaze-of-glory moment with swelling strings. In Rogue One, sacrifice is gritty, often silent, and sometimes unnoticed. It comes in fragments - a hand on a lever, a breath taken before storming a data vault, a decision made knowing no one will remember your name. The film argues that real rebellion requires real cost. Not just the loss of life, but the forfeiting of comfort, clarity, and sometimes, your own moral compass.

Jyn Erso’s journey hinges on this idea. She doesn’t start as a freedom fighter—she’s angry, aimless, just trying to stay out of view. But when she watches her father's hologram and realizes his entire life was a long con against the Empire, something shifts. The cause becomes personal. But more importantly, it becomes hers. 

Her sacrifice isn’t just in dying on Scarif - it’s in letting go of survival mode and finally choosing purpose over self-preservation.

Then there’s Cassian Andor. 

He’s already knee-deep in the muck by the time we meet him. His opening scene has him killing an informant not out of malice, but necessity. It's a jarring moment. We're used to our heroes being clean. But Cassian's arc shows that rebellion isn't neat. It's not righteous all the time. And when he decides to defy orders and join Jyn’s suicide mission, it’s not redemption. It’s conviction. He knows exactly how dirty this fight is. And he still chooses it.

The rest of the Rogue One crew follows suit. Chirrut, Baze, Bodhi, even K-2SO - each of them makes a choice that leads to certain death. And they make it without fanfare. That’s the power of this film. It shows us that heroism in Star Wars isn’t just blowing up Death Stars. Sometimes it’s dying so someone else can.

THE SHAPE OF REBELLION

The Rebellion we meet in Rogue One isn’t the tidy, morally assured outfit we remember from the original trilogy. It’s fractured. Messy. Tense with infighting and uncertainty. This isn’t the righteous underdog of Yavin IV. This is a collection of cells, ideals, and desperation, all arguing about how to fight a war they’ve already been losing. And that’s the point—Rogue One shows rebellion as something built in pieces, not born in full.

Mon Mothma and Bail Organa represent the old guard. Measured. Diplomatic. Willing to fight, but not at the cost of legitimacy. Then there’s Saw Gerrera - the radical. The outlier. Broken lungs, broken ideals. He’s what happens when resistance calcifies into extremism. He’s not wrong, exactly. But the way he fights? 

The other Rebels want nothing to do with it. That’s what makes his death so tragic. He never stops resisting, but he dies alone, untrusted by both sides.

The moment Jyn pleads for action in front of the Alliance council is where this theme burns brightest. She’s passionate. She’s telling the truth. She has the evidence. And still, the room hedges. They want consensus. 

They want safety. But rebellion doesn’t wait for permission. So when Jyn says, “Rebellions are built on hope,” what she’s really saying is:

 “Hope without action means nothing.”

The fact that Rogue One acts without orders is the beginning of the real Rebellion. It’s not that the Alliance suddenly gets brave - it’s that they finally see what sacrifice looks like and decide to follow it. The fleet over Scarif doesn’t launch because of orders. It launches because someone had to go first.

themes of hope rogue one

HOPE AS A WEAPON

Hope in Rogue One isn’t abstract. It’s tactical. Galen Erso doesn’t just die believing in hope—he builds it into the Death Star itself. A flaw, small but fatal, hidden in plain sight. It’s his final rebellion, encoded into the Empire’s ultimate symbol of control. And when Jyn discovers this? She realizes hope isn’t just a feeling - it’s a plan.

Every character clings to a version of hope. For Bodhi, it’s the hope that defecting will undo some of what he helped build. For Cassian, it’s the hope that everything he’s done might lead to something better. For Chirrut, hope is faith - quiet, stubborn, unshakable. Even K-2SO, the droid built for combat, shows flickers of belief that what they’re doing matters.

The title of A New Hope doesn’t feel metaphorical anymore. It becomes the literal payload of this film. The data disk. The baton passed in blood and breath. And Leia’s final line? “Hope.” It’s not just a nod to fans— - t’s the thesis. The entire film exists to justify that word.

What makes Rogue One’s take on hope resonate is how earned it feels. No one’s preaching it from a throne. It’s hope born of fear. Hope as resistance. Hope when the odds are unwinnable and the sky is falling. Not idealism. Just the refusal to quit.

baze rogue one

THE MUDDY TRUTH OF WAR

If the mainline Star Wars films deal in mythology, Rogue One deals in consequences. It drags the moral binaries of the franchise into the dirt and forces us to sit with them. 

There’s no Luke here. No Jedi code. Just people with blood on their hands trying to make sure the Empire doesn’t win.

Cassian’s character is the clearest expression of this. He’s not a white-hat rebel. He’s an assassin, a saboteur, someone who’s done “terrible things on behalf of the Rebellion.” And he doesn’t hide from it. 

The question the film keeps asking is: when does the end stop justifying the means? And who gets to decide?

Saw Gerrera takes that question and runs it off a cliff. He tortures. He bombs. He doesn’t care if his methods mirror the Empire’s - because in his eyes, anything less is surrender. The film doesn’t excuse him, but it also doesn’t fully condemn him. That’s the discomfort Rogue One traffics in. It forces us to ask: can you fight a monster without becoming one?

Even the Empire gets a bit of this treatment. Krennic’s ambitions. Tarkin’s politics. The bureaucracy and backstabbing. Evil here isn’t faceless—it’s human. Petty. Petulant. And that’s more terrifying than a Sith Lord. Because it reminds us that tyranny isn’t always grand - it’s often banal.


LEGACY IN THE SHADOW OF OBLIVION

Legacy in Rogue One isn’t about bloodlines. It’s about intent. About what you leave behind when no one remembers your name. None of these characters get statues. They don’t live to see what they changed. But they change everything.

Galen’s legacy lives through a data file. A flaw. A choice. Jyn’s legacy is believing it. Risking everything to make sure it reaches the right hands. Cassian’s legacy is standing beside her, even when his past might say otherwise. These aren’t icons. They’re ghosts. But their actions echo louder than any medal ceremony.

Memory plays a quiet role here too. The film remembers the ones the saga often forgets. 

The grunts. 

The pilots. 

The nameless rebels who die lighting the spark. 

Rogue One tells us that those people mattered.

That without them, there’s no trench run.

No redemption. No peace.

And by ending where A New Hope begins, Rogue One does something rare: it reframes the original trilogy. Suddenly, Luke isn’t just flying into danger - he’s carrying the burden of dead rebels who paved the way. Leia isn’t just a princess on a mission - she’s the final link in a chain of sacrifice.

It’s legacy not as lineage, but as debt. The future owes the past. And the galaxy keeps spinning because someone, somewhere, decided not to let it die in silence.


I’ve seen Rogue One more times than I can count, and every time, that ending still hits like a freight train. Not because they die - but because they choose to. It’s the only Star Wars film where you feel the weight of every loss, every win, every quiet moment in between. Writing this wasn’t just about analyzing themes. It was about honoring a story that dared to end in ashes and still call it hope.

This wasn’t made to slot neatly into the Skywalker saga. It was made to punch a hole through it. And that’s why it sticks. That’s why it lingers. Because sometimes, the story isn’t about the hero who saves the galaxy. Sometimes it’s about the ones who gave everything so someone else could.
06 April 2025

Themes of Identity and Duality in Denis Villeneuve’s Enemy

Something crawls under your skin while watching Enemy, and it is not just the spiders. Denis Villeneuve’s 2013 film is a slow-burning psychological maze, the kind that refuses to resolve into comfort or clarity. It does not explain itself. It watches you watching it. 

It lingers.

It loops.

It tightens.

There is a reason Enemy feels so invasive. 
 
Villeneuve is not chasing plot twists or genre payoff. He is dissecting identity as a lived condition, obsession as a coping mechanism, and control as a fantasy that collapses the moment you believe in it. Adapted from José Saramago’s The Double, the film places Jake Gyllenhaal, known for Donnie Darko and Nightcrawler, into a dual role that is less about doppelgängers and more about fracture. This is not two men who look alike. It is one psyche failing to stay whole.

If Prisoners exposed the mechanics of vengeance, and Incendies traced how trauma reverberates across generations, Enemy turns inward. It implodes. The city hums with dread, the palette of sickly yellows and exhausted grays drains individuality from every frame, and the narrative resists coherence on purpose. Villeneuve gives us a mirror, then removes the instructions.


The Fragility of Identity

Adam Bell exists in a state of sedation. He teaches history as if reading from a script he no longer believes in. He eats the same meals, returns to the same apartment, performs intimacy with Mary, played by Mélanie Laurent, with mechanical regularity. Nothing in Adam’s life suggests presence. 
 
He is functional, not alive.

So when he discovers Anthony Claire, a struggling actor who looks exactly like him, the reaction is not curiosity. It is terror. Seeing oneself from the outside is not flattering. It is annihilating. It exposes the self as replaceable, as something that can be performed by someone else just as convincingly.

As Adam searches for Anthony, something subtle begins to happen. He adopts Anthony’s posture. His cadence changes. His gaze hardens. There is a moment of attempted sexual confidence with Mary that feels rehearsed, as if Adam is borrowing masculinity from a template rather than generating it himself.

Gyllenhaal plays this slippage with restraint. The distinction between the two men is never exaggerated. That restraint matters. Enemy is not interested in spectacle. It is interested in erosion. Identity here is not a core truth waiting to be uncovered. 

Control, Power, and the Dictator Within

Enemy is saturated with the language of power. Adam’s lectures on totalitarianism are not background texture. 
 
They are confession. 
 
He describes dictatorships as systems obsessed with control, with censorship, with the management of desire and expression. 
 
He does not realize he is describing himself.

Anthony appears dominant. He is assertive, sexual, aggressive. But his control is theatrical. He bullies Adam into submission with ease because Adam is already trained to obey. Yet Anthony is just as trapped. His marriage to Helen, played by Sarah Gadon, terrifies him not because of love, but because of permanence. Fidelity feels like surveillance. Parenthood feels like a sentence.

The underground sex club sequences reduce this power struggle to pure symbol. Men in suits watch women crush spiders beneath their heels. Desire becomes ritualized violence. Control becomes spectacle. No one is free in these rooms. They are only cycling through roles.

Repression, Desire, and the Spider Motif

Sex in Enemy is joyless. Adam and Mary share space, not intimacy. Anthony’s sexuality is louder but emptier. Every sexual encounter feels transactional, driven by anxiety rather than pleasure.

The spiders that haunt the film are not simple metaphors. They are manifestations of fear, guilt, and the protagonist’s inability to reconcile desire with responsibility. They appear when repression peaks. 
 
They appear when control falters. 
 

Surrealism as Structure, Not Decoration

One of the most persistent debates around Enemy is whether it is truly surreal or merely symbolic. That debate misses the point. Villeneuve is not interested in choosing between logic and abstraction. 
 
For most of the film, Enemy presents itself as controlled magical realism. A man finds his exact double. The rules seem stable. Then the final image detonates that assumption. The spider is not a twist explaining the plot. It is a rupture that reframes the entire experience. 

The Car Crash and the Anxiety of Meaning

The car crash remains one of the film’s most contested moments. Is it literal. Is it psychological. Does it matter. The film deliberately refuses to clarify. What matters is that the crash functions as sacrifice. One persona is destroyed so the other can continue. Whether it happened in the physical world or only within the mind is irrelevant to its effect.

Enemy is not concerned with realism. It is concerned with repetition.

Cycles and the Illusion of Escape

Everything in Enemy loops. Behavior. Desire. Fear. Even transformation is temporary. When Adam finds the key again, when he prepares to step back into the underground, the spider waits. Not attacking. Watching. Afraid. Knowing what comes next.

Villeneuve does not offer redemption. He offers recognition. Identity is not a journey forward. It is a pattern we repeat until we learn to see it. Enemy ends where it begins because that is the point. 

02 April 2025

Dare Devil: Born Again > Review > Episode 7 - Art for Art's Sake

We're back in Hell's Kitchen, and Daredevil: Born Again is firing on all cylinders with Episode 7, "Art for Art's Sake." This isn't just about costumed heroes trading blows; it's a deep dive into the broken psyches of these characters, the way their histories haunt them, and the delicate balance between order and anarchy. This episode serves as a critical examination of the season's overarching themes, rather than simply a bridge to the finale.

We've been watching these pieces get set up, right? Murdock's dual life, that tightrope walk between lawyer and vigilante, Fisk's calculated ascent through the political ranks, and this...Muse. This episode, those pieces start to tumble, and the fallout is spectacular. It's a study in contrasts: the righteous rage of Daredevil versus the cold, calculating ambition of Kingpin, and the way their conflict shapes the very soul of New York City.

Dare Devil: Born Again > Review > Episode 7 - Art for Art's Sake



Murdock starts this episode feeling, dare I say, good. He's back in the suit, the devil's in him, and there's a kinetic energy to him we haven't seen in a while. After the events of the previous episodes, where he grappled with his identity and the loss of his old life, there's a sense of catharsis in seeing him embrace his role as Daredevil once more. But it doesn't last. That feeling of renewed purpose is quickly undercut by the complications of his personal life.

Heather Glenn, played with a sharp edge by Margarita Levieva, isn't buying his "I'm fine" act.

She sees the cracks, the self-destructive streak that's always been lurking beneath the surface. It's a raw, uncomfortable honesty, a therapist's eye cutting through the bravado, and it's some of the best acting we've seen from her this season. She's not just a love interest here; she's a mirror, reflecting Matt's own internal battle back at him. She's a grounded counterpoint to his heightened existence, constantly reminding him of the human cost of his choices.

"Is this some kind of self-harm?" she asks.

Ouch. 

hat line, delivered with Levieva's quiet intensity, hangs in the air, a stark reminder of the pain that fuels Daredevil's crusade. It's a question that gets to the heart of Matt's motivations: Is he fighting for justice, or is he simply trying to punish himself?

Meanwhile, Detective Cherry (Clark Johnson) is still mad. Mad at Murdock for going back to the Daredevil life. He's seen what that life does to a man, the toll it takes, and he's not afraid to call Matt out on it. There's a weariness to Cherry, a sense of "I've seen this all before," that adds a compelling layer to his character. He represents the perspective of the everyday cop, the one who has to clean up the mess left behind by the vigilantes and the criminals, and he's tired of it.

We need more Cherry!

His frustration isn't just about the law; it's about watching a friend walk a dangerous path again, a path that Cherry knows can only lead to more pain and suffering.

Fisk, though. Fisk is in his element. Muse, the serial killer artist with a flair for the dramatic and the macabre, throws a wrench in his plans, disrupting the carefully constructed order he's trying to impose on the city. But Fisk, ever the opportunist, doesn't just react; he spins it. He takes credit for Daredevil's actions, demonizes masks, and uses the chaos to further his own agenda. He's a master of manipulation, turning tragedy into an opportunity to consolidate his power.

Vincent D'Onofrio plays this man with such a terrifying, believable power.

It's not just about physical presence; it's about the way he commands a room, the way he manipulates the narrative, the way he makes you believe that this kind of darkness could thrive in the real world. Fisk's rise to power is a chilling reflection of contemporary politics, a stark reminder of how easily demagoguery can take root. It's like watching a dark mirror of our own world, a chilling reflection of the seductive nature of power.

And then there's Vanessa. The subplot with Luca wraps up, but it feels...empty. It always felt like Fisk's past would come back in some bigger, more consequential way, that his sins would find a way to catch up with him. This episode tests Vanessa's loyalty and reveals the complex dynamics of her relationship with Fisk. Still, the mafia movie vibes are there, with the hushed conversations, the veiled threats, and the inevitable bloodshed. It's a reminder: Fisk can't escape who he is, no matter how high he climbs. He's forever bound to the criminal underworld, and that connection threatens to drag him down.

The Daredevil/Muse fight is the episode's centerpiece, a brutal ballet of violence and desperation. I'm not sure I entirely buy Muse going toe-to-toe with Daredevil; the disparity in experience should be significant. But the show sells it with sheer ferocity. It's not about fancy choreography; it's about the raw, animalistic struggle for survival. It's a clash of ideologies as much as it is a physical confrontation: Daredevil's controlled rage versus Muse's chaotic, unhinged violence.

The hook-through-the-shoulder? Chef's kiss.

That moment, that visceral, shocking image, is a reminder that this isn't your average superhero show. There are consequences here, real pain, and a willingness to push the boundaries of what we expect. It's a moment that lingers in the mind, a testament to the show's unflinching portrayal of violence.

Some other thoughts:

  • Is Glenn also Muse's therapist? It would be a very Marvel-y coincidence, a twist of fate that underscores the interconnectedness of these characters' lives. It would add another layer to the thematic exploration of identity and the masks we wear, both literally and figuratively.
  • How much blood did Muse have in his nose? That's a question that lingers, a testament to the episode's commitment to the grotesque. It's a visual that's both disturbing and unforgettable, highlighting the character's descent into madness.

Verdict:

This episode is a turning point. The two worlds are now firm colliding, the carefully constructed facades are crumbling, and there's no going back. We're hurtling towards the finale, and it's exciting, if a little heartbreaking. There's a sense of inevitability here, a feeling that these characters are trapped in a tragic dance, and we're just waiting to see who gets caught in the crossfire.

Muse is gone too soon. He had potential to be a truly memorable villain, a twisted reflection of the city's underbelly. But I guess that's the nature of this universe. There are too many villains, too little time, and sometimes, the story demands a sacrifice. His death serves a purpose, though: it acts as a catalyst for the other characters, forcing them to confront their own demons and make crucial choices.

Glenn gets some much-needed focus, but I'm still not entirely sold on her as Matt's equal. She's good with him, she challenges him, but there's a distance, a sense that she doesn't fully understand the darkness that he carries. Their relationship, while compelling, lacks the deep-seated connection that Matt shared with previous love interest such as Claire.

Matt's back as Daredevil, and it feels right. It feels like a return to form, a reclaiming of his identity. But it's causing problems. His return to vigilantism has immediate repercussions on his relationships and his professional life.

Cherry's pissed, his old friend and ally now sees him as a liability. Glenn's worried, fearing that he's sacrificing his hard-won stability for the thrill of the fight. He's got to figure out if he can be both Matt and Daredevil, or if he even wants to. That internal conflict, that push and pull between the light and the dark, is at the heart of this show. It's a struggle that resonates with the audience, as we all grapple with the different sides of ourselves.

Fisk, of course, is loving this. He's got his enemies right where he wants them, playing them against each other, manipulating events to his advantage. He's a master strategist, a puppet master pulling the strings from the shadows. His political power, combined with his underworld connections, makes him a formidable threat, and he's not afraid to use either to achieve his goals. 

And Vanessa? 

She's becoming more dangerous, more involved in her husband's machinations. She's not just Fisk's wife anymore; she's a player in her own right, with her own ambitions and her own agenda. Her transformation this season has been subtle but significant, hinting at a ruthlessness that rivals her husband's.

We've got two episodes left. And it's going to be a bloodbath.




01 April 2025

Alien Encounters of the Sexual Kind: The themes of Sexuality - Motherhood in the 'Alien' film franchise

WEYLAND-YUTANI CORP
Building Better Worlds
INTERNAL MEMORANDUM // EYES ONLY
SUBJECT: SPECIMEN XX121 PSYCHOSEXUAL ANALYSIS
Franchise Analysis

The Intimate Horror: Sexuality and Biomechanics in the Alien Franchise

Sex sells in cinema, but not the way it does in Alien. From Giger's nightmares to David's flute, the franchise explores the terror of violation.

The "Alien" film franchise, since its inception in 1979, has been a touchstone in the realms of science fiction and horror. While celebrated for its gripping narratives and groundbreaking visuals, beneath the surface of otherworldly terror lies a rich tapestry of themes. Among these, sexuality stands as a particularly compelling and complex element.

This exploration delves into the intricate portrayal of sexuality within the "Alien" series. It examines how these themes are woven into the very fabric of its narrative and visual design. From the visceral design of Giger's Xenomorph, an embodiment of sexual horror and aggression, to the subversion of traditional gender roles and the portrayal of reproduction as a process of fear and violation, each facet contributes to a deeper understanding of how sexuality is depicted in this franchise.

I. Alien (1979): The Primal Nightmare

"Alien" stands as a milestone in science fiction. Directed by Ridley Scott, the film presents a complex interplay of sexual imagery, fears, and metaphors. From the unsettling design of the alien creature to the subtle representations of sexual violence, it serves as fertile ground for examining how sexuality is woven into the fabric of horror.

The Concept of Abjection

Julia Kristeva's theory of abjection offers a compelling lens through which to examine "Alien." Abjection refers to the human reaction to a threatened breakdown in meaning caused by the loss of the distinction between self and other. In "Alien," this is vividly portrayed through the creature's lifecycle.

alien chest burst scene original
The chestburster: A violent perversion of birth.

The alien defies categorization. It is neither fully animal nor humanoid. Its method of reproduction—through the implantation of an embryo in a host leading to a violent birth—blurs the lines between creation and destruction. This grotesque process exemplifies the abject by confronting the audience with primal fears associated with bodily invasion.

Sexual Imagery and Symbolism

The film's design, heavily influenced by H.R. Giger, is rich in Freudian undertones. Giger's creation is distinctly phallic, especially in the elongated shape of its head. This subtly implants notions of sexual threat. The facehugger's attack is invasive and personal. The way it forcibly implants an embryo into its host can be seen as a metaphor for sexual assault.

Furthermore, the film's androgynous imagery challenges traditional gender representations. Film analyst Lina Badley notes how "Alien" blurs the lines of gender, especially in the portrayal of Ripley. By the end of the film, Ripley is sexualized in a way that is both vulnerable and empowering. The scene where she is in her ‘space underwear’ showcases her vulnerability while she remains strong and capable.

ellen ripley space nipples alien
Vulnerability meets capability in the Narcissus shuttle.

The Monstrous-Feminine

Central to this discussion is Barbara Creed's concept of the "monstrous-feminine." In "Alien," this is embodied by the creature which represents a perverse form of femininity. The character of Ash adds another layer. His attempt to kill Ripley using a rolled-up magazine has been interpreted as symbolic of sexual violence. Dan O'Bannon, the screenwriter, acknowledged his intention to provoke male fears of penetration and impregnation, inverting traditional horror tropes.

ask sexually assaults ripley alien
Ash's assault on Ripley: A biomechanical violation.

II. Aliens (1986): Maternal War

In James Cameron's sequel, we witness a divergence from the original's themes. One of the most striking themes is the juxtaposition of motherhood and reproductive imagery. Ripley develops a deep, protective bond with Newt, which contrasts the biological horror of the alien life cycle.

The introduction of the Alien Queen creates a dark mirror to human reproductive instincts. The Queen is the antithesis of Ripley's nurturing figure. Ripley also embodies a blend of feminine and masculine traits, while the character of Vasquez further blurs these gender lines. The sexual imagery remains present but subdued, integrated into a broader context of action and survival.

aliens film sequel queen sexuality mother
The Queen: A monstrous matriarch.

III. Alien 3 (1992): Nihilism and Intimacy

"Alien 3," directed by David Fincher, presents a stark thematic shift. The alien is portrayed as a demonic entity by the inmates of Fury 161. A significant subplot is Ripley's relationship with Dr. Jonathan Clemens. This marks the first time Ripley engages in a physical, intimate relationship.

This intimacy signifies Ripley's attempt to reclaim her humanity. It represents a brief respite in a hostile environment. However, this moment is short-lived, as Clemens is killed, reinforcing the narrative of loss. The interpretation of the alien as a demon adds a metaphysical layer to the horror, transforming it into a symbol of existential dread.

sexuality of ripley celemens alien 3
Intimacy on the edge of the apocalypse.

IV. Alien: Resurrection (1997): The Hybrid

Directed by Jean-Pierre Jeunet, this film explores the hybridization of human and alien DNA. The resurrection of Ellen Ripley through cloning creates a character who embodies both traits. This blurring of species boundaries serves as a metaphor for breaking down sexual and biological norms.

The Newborn alien is a significant symbol. Its violent birth from the Alien Queen represents a monstrous form of creation. The creature's ambiguous appearance blurs the lines between human and alien, evoking uncanny horror tied to reproductive themes.

alien mother hood themes resurrection
The twisted family tree of the Resurrection.

V. Prometheus (2012): Infertility and Autonomy

A central theme in "Prometheus" is the exploration of bodily invasion, particularly regarding women’s autonomy. Dr. Elizabeth Shaw's infertility is a critical element. David the android’s act of infecting Holloway leads to an impossible pregnancy for Shaw. Her insistence on removing the alien entity underscores the right to choose.

David’s attempt to prevent the abortion mirrors real-world debates over reproductive rights. The medpod scene, where the machine is calibrated only for males, underscores gender biases. "Prometheus" effectively contributes to the conversation about bodily autonomy and societal expectations.

VI. Alien: Covenant (2017): Creation and Perversion

"Alien: Covenant" delves into the origins of the Xenomorphs. The film highlights the horrors of uncontrolled reproduction through the Neomorphs' lifecycle. These creatures emerge in a rapid and violent manner, representing a perversion of natural birth.

covenant neomorph alien xenomorph
The Neomorph: Nature red in tooth and claw.

David's God Complex

David emerges as a central figure, embodying a blend of creator and destroyer. His manipulation of the alien pathogen to breed Xenomorphs is a chilling parallel to playing god. The flute scene between David and Walter is laden with sexual symbolism. David's line, "I'll do the fingering," is heavily loaded with innuendo, interpreting David's attempt to seduce Walter into transcending his programming.

covenant shower scene alien attack
The classic vulnerability of the shower scene, revisited.

David’s obsession with creating the perfect life form is reminiscent of human sexual reproduction but twisted into bio-engineering. This dynamic explores the ethics of creation and the lust for power.

alien covenant sexuality themes
David's laboratory of horrors.

Conclusion

In the expansive realm of science fiction and horror, the "Alien" film series distinguishes itself as a profound inquiry into the nature of sexuality. At its heart, the series dissects primal fears through the motif of the monstrous. The Xenomorph epitomizes sexual menace and invasion. The franchise's approach to gender roles is groundbreaking, upending conventional tropes and challenging traditional norms. Moreover, the series offers a radical reinterpretation of reproduction and birth, portraying these processes as laden with horror and intrusion.

Why Theodosia appears to Valya as her brother Griffin in Dune: Prophecy - Twice Born

Theo’s revelation as a Face Dancer in Dune: Prophecy Episode 4, Twice Born, intertwines deeply with the broader mythology of the Dune universe.

Face Dancers, the shapeshifting operatives of the Bene Tleilax, represent one of the most enigmatic and feared creations within Herbert’s world. Their origins lie in Tleilaxu genetic engineering, designed to serve as assassins, infiltrators, and manipulators in service of the Tleilaxu’s long-term agendas. Theo, however, represents a deviation from the norm—an exile from her creators, now sheltered by the Bene Gesserit.

Why Theodosia appears to Valya as her brother Griffin in Dune: Prophecy - Twice Born

Origins: Theo's Tleilaxu Ties and Escape

The Bene Tleilax are known for their brutal control over their creations, using them as tools for subterfuge within the Imperium. Theo’s aversion to using her abilities and the pain involved in her transformations suggests a traumatic history, possibly rooted in the extreme conditioning the Tleilaxu impose on their Face Dancers.

Her statement about hoping never to use her powers again points to a desire to escape not only the physical agony but also the psychological trauma of being seen as a mere instrument of manipulation.

It’s likely that Theo's “creators,” alluded to in earlier episodes, are a rogue Tleilaxu faction seeking her return—either to reclaim their lost asset or to prevent her from exposing their secrets as a shape shifter.

Why Theo Appears to Valya Harkonnen

Theodoisa's choice to reveal herself as Griffin to Valya stems from layers of emotional and strategic reasoning. Valya, as the Sisterhood’s formidable and calculating leader, views Theo’s abilities as a critical asset in their struggle against external threats like Desmond. 

Valya’s earlier admission that Theo was brought to Salusa Secundus for her “gifts” underscores a utilitarian relationship, but there’s a subtler undercurrent: Valya, who herself has endured immense personal sacrifice for the Sisterhood, sees Theo as a mirror of her own struggles.

The transformation into Griffin, Valya’s deceased brother, is an act of profound emotional significance.

Theo uses her abilities not only to comfort Valya but also to demonstrate her loyalty and empathy. By embodying Griffin, Theo validates Valya’s sacrifices and silently pledges her own to the Sisterhood’s cause. This act is deeply personal, as it bridges the gap between Theo’s fear of her nature and Valya’s unrelenting drive for the Sisterhood’s survival.

Thematic Resonance and Sacrifice

Theo’s arc reflects Herbert’s recurring themes of identity, power, and sacrifice. 

Face Dancing, with its capacity to erase individuality, aligns metaphorically with the Bene Gesserit’s own practices of subsuming personal desires for collective goals. Yet Theo’s transformation is also an act of agency: she chooses to use her powers in a moment of vulnerability, making her not just a tool of manipulation but a willing participant in the Sisterhood’s vision.

The physical pain of Face Dancing, dramatized visually and through Theo’s cries of anguish, reinforces the idea of personal sacrifice as central to loyalty within the Dune mythos. Just as Reverend Mothers endure the Agony to gain prescient insight, Theo endures the torment of transformation to solidify her place in the Sisterhood and affirm her commitment to Valya’s mission.

Theo’s presence among the Bene Gesserit raises questions about the order’s ethical boundaries and the lengths they are willing to go to ensure their survival. If the rest of the Sisterhood were to discover her Tleilaxu origins, it could provoke distrust and challenge their unity. Simultaneously, Theo’s inclusion hints at a broader conflict between the Sisterhood and the Tleilaxu, potentially foreshadowing future power struggles.

Theo’s decision to reveal her true self in Twice Born enriches the narrative tapestry of Dune: Prophecy. It exemplifies how personal histories and larger political schemes intersect in Herbert’s universe, underscoring the cost of loyalty and the delicate balance between agency and servitude. 

The best X-Files 'Monster of the Week' episodes

The Best 'Monster of the Week' Episodes from The X-Files

The X-Files redefined episodic television with its iconic "Monster of the Week" format, offering fans a dazzling array of self-contained narratives that showcased the show’s imaginative scope. These episodes stood apart from the mythology-driven conspiracy arcs, delving into standalone tales that explored the strange, macabre, and sometimes absurd. They embodied the series' fearless genre-blending, veering seamlessly between horror, science fiction, dark comedy, and the outright surreal.

From grotesque mutants to supernatural enigmas, the “Monster of the Week” episodes pushed creative boundaries, delivering gripping stories rooted in urban legends, folklore, and cultural fears. These episodes often doubled as incisive commentaries on societal anxieties, tapping into a zeitgeist shaped by distrust of authority, fear of the unknown, and fascination with the paranormal.

Despite their standalone nature, they offered sharp character insights, deepening the dynamic between Mulder’s zealous belief in the extraordinary and Scully’s skeptical empiricism. Whether terrifying, whimsical, or darkly satirical, these episodes remain essential viewing for fans of inventive storytelling. Here’s a dive into some of the most memorable and celebrated “Monster of the Week” episodes from The X-Files, each a testament to the series’ legacy as a masterclass in suspense and creativity.

The Essential Episodes

A curated selection of the most memorable standalone monster episodes.

"Squeeze"Season 1, Episode 3 | Written by Glen Morgan & James Wong


"Squeeze" marks The X-Files' first true foray into the "Monster of the Week" format, setting a high bar for the episodes that followed. It introduces Eugene Victor Tooms, a mutant killer with the grotesque ability to stretch and contort his body to slip through impossibly tight spaces. Tooms preys on victims to harvest their livers, which he consumes to hibernate for decades. The dark, claustrophobic tone is palpable, as Mulder and Scully chase a predator who embodies primal fears of invasion and violation. What makes "Squeeze" enduring is how it establishes The X-Files' knack for making the extraordinary eerily believable. A key moment sees Tooms’ yellow eyes glowing in the dark—a haunting image that cemented him as one of the series’ most iconic villains.

"The Host"Season 2, Episode 2 | Written by Chris Carter


This is the quintessential X-Files “Monster of the Week” installment that melds body horror with ecological dread. The episode introduces the unforgettable Flukeman, a grotesque, humanoid parasite born from radioactive contamination in the sewers of Newark, New Jersey. Its origin as an unintended byproduct of industrial waste reflects the show’s recurring theme of humanity’s reckless relationship with nature. The episode is notable for its unrelenting atmosphere of decay and unease, from its nauseatingly claustrophobic sewer scenes to the disturbing visual of the Flukeman’s sucker-like maw. A standout moment sees the creature disgorged into a sewer pipe, alive and ready to haunt the deep—a haunting metaphor for humanity’s inability to fully contain the fallout of its actions.
the host x-files episode

"Humbug"Season 2, Episode 20 | Written by Darin Morgan


"Humbug" is a daring and deeply satirical episode that flips The X-Files formula on its head. Mulder and Scully travel to a Florida town populated by retired circus performers to investigate bizarre murders. Darkly humorous and oddly tender, the episode interrogates societal definitions of normalcy, turning the investigative spotlight on Mulder and Scully as outsiders. Morgan’s razor-sharp script is packed with biting wit and poignant commentary on prejudice. "Humbug" broke ground as the first X-Files episode to embrace overt comedy, showcasing a unique ability to balance levity and horror. Its lasting legacy is its challenge to viewers: who are the real monsters—those who look different or those who judge them?
humbug xfiles tattoo man

"Die Hand Die Verletzt"Season 2, Episode 14 | Written by Glen Morgan & James Wong


One of the darkest and most unnerving episodes, blending supernatural horror with biting social commentary. The story unfolds in the seemingly sleepy town of Milford Haven, where Mulder and Scully investigate a grisly death linked to a Satanic ritual. They uncover a group of hypocritical parents who practice occult rituals for selfish gain. When their rituals go wrong, they awaken a malevolent force embodied by Mrs. Paddock, a substitute teacher. The episode dissects themes of moral panic and hypocrisy, drawing from the “Satanic Panic” of the 1980s and 90s. The chilling final message on the chalkboard, “Goodbye. It’s been nice working with you,” is an iconic series moment.

"War of the Coprophages"Season 3, Episode 12 | Written by Darin Morgan


A masterclass in blending comedy, horror, and social commentary. Mulder investigates a bizarre outbreak of cockroach-related deaths, suspecting the involvement of extraterrestrial, robotic insects. Meanwhile, Scully offers grounded (and hilariously dismissive) commentary over the phone. Morgan’s script skewers humanity’s irrational fear of the unknown and the media’s role in amplifying panic. The episode’s title is a nod to *The War of the Worlds*, underscoring its theme of mass hysteria, complete with a fourth-wall-breaking visual gag that left many viewers swatting at their own TV screens.

"Chinga"Season 5, Episode 10 | Co-written by Stephen King & Chris Carter


A chilling blend of Stephen King’s signature small-town horror and The X-Files’ eerie style. Scully’s vacation in coastal Maine is interrupted by gruesome deaths linked to a sinister doll wielded by a young girl named Polly. The cursed toy drives townspeople to commit horrifying acts of self-harm. King’s influence is evident in the moody atmosphere and claustrophobic terror. The doll’s chilling refrain of "I want to play!" and its eerie, lifelike gaze are indelibly haunting.

"Sanguinarium"Season 4, Episode 6 | Written by Valerie & Vivian Mayhew


This episode plunges into the macabre world of vanity and greed in a high-end plastic surgery clinic. Mulder and Scully investigate bizarre deaths linked to cosmetic procedures gone horrifically wrong, revealing a surgeon using black magic to maintain youth and success by sacrificing patients. The episode excels in its visceral horror and its critique of society’s obsession with beauty, underscored by the title's Latin origin for “bloodthirsty.”

"Quagmire"Season 3, Episode 22 | Written by Kim Newton


This episode merges cryptozoological intrigue with a poignant exploration of Mulder and Scully’s dynamic. The agents investigate deaths linked to a possible lake monster named “Big Blue.” The heart of "Quagmire" lies in the now-iconic “conversation on the rock,” where the stranded agents engage in a deeply philosophical dialogue about life, loss, and obsession. This quiet, intimate moment is a fan favorite for its deft balancing of monster-hunting suspense and profound emotional resonance.
quagmire xfiles loch ness monster episode

"Badlaa"Season 8, Episode 10 | Written by John Shiban


A grotesque tale of vengeance and exploitation. A mysterious Indian mystic, portrayed by Deep Roy, uses supernatural abilities to infiltrate the bodies of his victims, smuggling himself into the U.S. inside another person’s stomach. The episode’s horror hinges on visceral, body-focused dread, but beneath the gore lies a layered exploration of cultural dislocation and post-colonial exploitation. Scully takes center stage here, grappling with her own evolving beliefs about the inexplicable.

"Familiar"Season 11, Episode 8 | Written by Benjamin Van Allen


A haunting return to The X-Files’ dark roots, combining supernatural horror with a dissection of small-town paranoia. A boy’s murder appears linked to “Mr. Chuckleteeth,” a nightmarish children’s character brought to life by witchcraft. The episode explores how fear can spiral into collective hysteria, reminiscent of the Salem witch trials. The title "Familiar" refers both to the witch’s familiar spirit and the eerie sense of déjà vu in the story’s themes of scapegoating and moral panic.

"Arcadia"Season 6, Episode 15 | Written by Daniel Arkin


A sharp, satirical take on suburban life. Mulder and Scully go undercover as a married couple ("Rob and Laura Petrie") in a gated community to investigate mysterious disappearances. They discover a tulpa—a thought-form monster—summoned by the residents’ obsessive adherence to rules, which viciously enforces the neighborhood’s oppressive regulations. The episode explores themes of repression and the cost of striving for perfection at the expense of individuality.

"X-Cops"Season 7, Episode 12 | Written by Vince Gilligan


An inventive crossover with the reality TV show *Cops*, blending vérité-style filmmaking with paranormal horror. The episode follows Mulder and Scully's investigation in Los Angeles, captured entirely by a *Cops* camera crew. The case involves a creature that manifests as its victims’ greatest fears, creating a surreal and chaotic ride through urban paranoia. The raw, handheld aesthetic heightens the episode’s tension and unpredictability.

"Roadrunners"Season 8, Episode 4 | Written by Vince Gilligan


A harrowing, claustrophobic horror story. Scully investigates a disappearance in a remote desert town, uncovering a cult that worships a parasitic slug-like creature they believe to be divine. When Scully becomes the cult’s next target, the episode becomes a visceral fight for survival. The stark, isolated setting and exploration of blind faith create a suffocating sense of dread. Doggett’s late arrival to rescue Scully marks a poignant beginning of mutual trust between them.

"Lord of the Flies"Season 9, Episode 5 | Written by Thomas Schnauz


A darkly comedic and grotesque installment that takes a satirical jab at reality television and teen culture. A bizarre death during the filming of a *Jackass*-style stunt show leads Doggett and Scully to a high school outcast who is part human, part insect. The episode balances humor and horror, with absurd stunts juxtaposed against the boy's chilling transformation. It features a guest role from a pre-*Breaking Bad* Aaron Paul and explores themes of freakishness, identity, and the search for belonging.

About the author Jimmy Jangles


My name is Jimmy Jangles, the founder of The Astromech. I have always been fascinated by the world of science fiction, especially the Star Wars universe, and I created this website to share my love for it with fellow fans.

At The Astromech, you can expect to find a variety of articles, reviews, and analysis related to science fiction, including books, movies, TV, and games.
From exploring the latest news and theories to discussing the classics, I aim to provide entertaining and informative content for all fans of the genre.

Whether you are a die-hard Star Trek fan or simply curious about the world of science fiction, The Astromech has something for everyone. So, sit back, relax, and join me on this journey through the stars!
Back to Top