Pluribus: Carol has never been independent of any human society

If there is a core conflict driving Pluribus, it is the friction between the messy unpredictability of human individuality and the terrifying, frictionless consensus of the Hive.

We often romanticize the "human spirit" as an unconquerable variable, a vital spark that refuses to be extinguished. But Pluribus dares to ask a more uncomfortable question: is that spirit actually just a collection of inefficient neuroses?

In the third episode, "Grenade," the show stops debating philosophy and starts demonstrating behavioral psychology. The result is a sequence that serves as a brutal stress test for the concept of "free will" in a post-scarcity environment.

The rejection of perfection

The inciting incident is a quintessential act of human defiance. Carol, our designated outlier, rejects a breakfast tray prepared by the Hive with perfect nutritional and thermal precision.

It is a beautifully irrational act.

She doesn't reject the food because of its quality; she rejects it because the "Other" provided it. It is a rejection of intimacy without consent. Desperate to re-establish agency over her own life, she initiates a new mission: a trip to the supermarket. She specifically targets Spouts, a relic of the pre-Joining era known for its "organic" and "natural" branding.

These are terms that now feel like emotional crutches in a world where the Hive has solved the problem of hunger.

The horror of the void

When Carol arrives at the store, the reality of the new world hits her.

The shelves are bare. 

This isn't a sign of shortage; it is a sign of logic. 

The Hive Mind, operating as a unified consciousness, has realized that the "retail display" aspect of the supply chain is psychological theater. 

Why buffer food on shelves for random browsing when you can deliver nutrition directly to the person who needs it?

Carol’s arrival at the empty store is a collision between a nostalgic human and a utilitarian world. She stands in the void of the produce aisle, a singular disconnect in a perfectly integrated system. She is looking for the comfort of ritual in a world that has moved past the need for it.

Weaponized Empathy

Then comes the system response, and it is arguably the most terrifying display of power in the series to date.

The Hive does not argue. It does not negotiate. It simply manifests what Carol demands.

Within minutes, a fleet of trucks converges on the store. The swarm of workers—nodes in the collective consciousness - moves with a fluid, silent synchronicity that is deeply unsettling.

They restock the shelves not because the store needs stock, but because Carol’s psyche requires it. It is a dynamic staging of a 20th-century retail experience, performed in real-time solely to pacify a distressed human.

This display of "scary efficiency" reveals the Hive's true foresight. They anticipated this emotional outburst. It highlights the absolute asymmetry of the conflict. Carol is playing a survival game; the Hive is performing therapeutic roleplay. They can rebuild her entire world faster than she can decide what she wants for dinner.

The speed of the restock mocks her attempt at labor. It proves that her "struggle" is merely a permitted tantrum within their domain.

The Trap of Nostalgia

Faced with this overwhelming abundance of fresh fruits, vegetables, and the raw ingredients of life, Carol makes her selection.

And here, the psychology of the scene executes a fascinating twist. She ignores the fresh produce she fought to access. Instead, she grabs a pre-made, microwaveable meal. It is processed, plastic-wrapped, and artificial.

On the surface, this could be read as an act of spite thrown in the Hive's face. It appears to be a rejection of their fresh offerings in favor of her own garbage. It is a petty, human assertion of preference over quality.

However, a deeper diagnostic suggests a darker conclusion. Carol’s choice of the microwave meal betrays the fatal flaw in her worldview. She claims to want independence, self-reliance, and the "natural" human experience. Yet, when given the tools to cook or to create, she defaults to the pre-packaged convenience of the old world.

She swaps dependency on the Hive for dependency on the ghost of industrial capitalism. She is not "hunting and gathering"; she is simply choosing which master she prefers to be fed by: the efficient alien one, or the defunct human one.

The Spouts sequence compiles into a devastating thesis statement for the series. Carol cannot be truly independent because "independence" was an illusion long before the aliens arrived. We have always been reliant on massive, invisible systems - supply chains, agricultural grids, and corporate distribution models.

The Hive has merely taken over the management. Carol’s tragedy isn't that she is fighting to be free; it is that she is fighting to return to an older, less efficient version of captivity.

She is not a rebel breaking the system; she is a person grieving a world that no longer exists, unable to accept a paradise she didn't ask for.

Leave a Comment

The James Bond Film Chronology Order

Across more than six decades the James Bond series has evolved through shifting eras, changing tones, and a remarkable lineup of actors, yet each film still steps into the same iconic world of espionage, glamour, and danger that defines the longest running franchise in cinema history. 

From the Caribbean shadows of Dr. No to the high orbit spectacle of Moonraker, from the emotional weight of On Her Majesty’s Secret Service to the reinvention found in Casino Royale, the films track the transformation of an archetype who reflects the fears and fantasies of every generation that watches him. 

Each entry carries its own identity, shaped by the actor in the tuxedo, the villain who tests him, the woman who partners or challenges him, and the geopolitical tension that frames the mission. Seen in sequence, they form a moving portrait of a character who adapts to match his time while carrying forward the familiar ingredients that make a Bond adventure unmistakably itself. 

This chronological list captures that evolution of 007 in full, charting how the role passes from Connery to Lazenby to Moore to Dalton to Brosnan to Craig, showing both the reinvention and the continuity that have allowed James Bond to remain an enduring figure on the world stage.

The Complete Chronological Order of the James Bond Films

Film	Year	Bond Actor	Main Villain	Bond Girl	Key Plot Point
Dr. No	1962	Sean Connery	Dr. Julius No	Honey Ryder	Bond uncovers SPECTRE’s plan to disrupt American space launches.
From Russia with Love	1963	Sean Connery	Rosa Klebb	Tatiana Romanova	SPECTRE manipulates East and West to steal a cryptographic device.
Goldfinger	1964	Sean Connery	Auric Goldfinger	Pussy Galore	Goldfinger plans to irradiate Fort Knox to raise his gold’s value.
Thunderball	1965	Sean Connery	Emilio Largo	Domino	SPECTRE steals nuclear bombs and demands ransom.
You Only Live Twice	1967	Sean Connery	Ernst Stavro Blofeld	Aki and Kissy Suzuki	SPECTRE hijacks spacecraft to provoke global conflict.
On Her Majesty’s Secret Service	1969	George Lazenby	Ernst Stavro Blofeld	Tracy di Vicenzo	Bond marries Tracy and battles Blofeld’s biological warfare plot.
Diamonds Are Forever	1971	Sean Connery	Ernst Stavro Blofeld	Tiffany Case	Bond investigates diamond smuggling linked to a space laser weapon.
Live and Let Die	1973	Roger Moore	Dr. Kananga	Solitaire	Bond exposes a heroin trafficking plot across the Caribbean.
The Man with the Golden Gun	1974	Roger Moore	Francisco Scaramanga	Mary Goodnight	Bond hunts a world class assassin while chasing a solar energy device.
The Spy Who Loved Me	1977	Roger Moore	Karl Stromberg	Anya Amasova	A villain seeks to start nuclear war and rebuild civilization underwater.
Moonraker	1979	Roger Moore	Hugo Drax	Holly Goodhead	Bond uncovers a plan to exterminate humanity using nerve toxin from space.
For Your Eyes Only	1981	Roger Moore	Aristotle Kristatos	Melina Havelock	Bond races to retrieve a sunken targeting computer before enemies do.
Octopussy	1983	Roger Moore	Kamal Khan and General Orlov	Octopussy	A Soviet plot to detonate a bomb in West Germany threatens NATO stability.
A View to a Kill	1985	Roger Moore	Max Zorin	Stacey Sutton	Zorin aims to destroy Silicon Valley to dominate microchip markets.
The Living Daylights	1987	Timothy Dalton	Koskov and Whitaker	Kara Milovy	An apparent defection plot hides a major arms dealing conspiracy.
Licence to Kill	1989	Timothy Dalton	Franz Sanchez	Pam Bouvier	Bond goes rogue to avenge Felix Leiter and his murdered wife.
GoldenEye	1995	Pierce Brosnan	Alec Trevelyan	Natalya Simonova	Bond confronts a former ally leading a revenge driven anti British attack.
Tomorrow Never Dies	1997	Pierce Brosnan	Elliot Carver	Wai Lin	A media mogul manipulates events to trigger war for ratings and profit.
The World Is Not Enough	1999	Pierce Brosnan	Renard and Elektra King	Dr. Christmas Jones	A plot involving oil pipelines and nuclear terrorism draws Bond into betrayal.
Die Another Day	2002	Pierce Brosnan	Gustav Graves	Jinx Johnson	A conflict with North Korean agents escalates into a satellite superweapon crisis.
Casino Royale	2006	Daniel Craig	Le Chiffre	Vesper Lynd	Bond earns double zero status while disrupting a terrorist financier.
Quantum of Solace	2008	Daniel Craig	Dominic Greene	Camille Montes	Bond uncovers a shadow organisation seeking control over global resources.
Skyfall	2012	Daniel Craig	Raoul Silva	Séverine	An ex MI6 operative targets M in a personal vendetta.
Spectre	2015	Daniel Craig	Ernst Stavro Blofeld	Madeleine Swann	Bond discovers the return of SPECTRE and its link to his past.
No Time to Die	2021	Daniel Craig	Lyutsifer Safin	Madeleine Swann	Bond confronts a bioweapon threat while reckoning with his emotional legacy.

Leave a Comment

James Bond: One Man, Many Faces

For forty years the James Bond films followed one man through shifting eras, changing threats, and the cold glow of the geopolitical world he inhabited.

The actors changed, but the life behind the tuxedo stayed the same, stitched together by shared history, emotional scars, and deliberate continuity threads woven across the series.

What emerged was a single biography told across five faces, a long chronology that never reset until the arrival of Daniel Craig’s somewhat separate timeline.

We make the case.

From Connery with Love: The Case for One Continuous Bond

For four decades, from Dr. No in 1962 through Die Another Day in 2002, the Eon series presents James Bond as one man living one long, dangerous life, not as a set of disconnected versions reinvented with each new actor.

Sean Connery (Zardoz, The Untouchables), George Lazenby, Roger Moore (The Saint, Spiceworld), Timothy Dalton (Hot Fuzz, The Rocketeer), and Pierce Brosnan (The Thomas Crown Affair, Mars Attacks!) inherit the same emotional history, the same scars, and the same professional mythology. The clearest example is Bond’s marriage and its aftermath.

On Her Majesty’s Secret Service ends with Tracy’s murder, a moment that could have been quietly forgotten when Lazenby walked away. Instead, Eon doubles down.

In For Your Eyes Only, Moore’s Bond visits Tracy’s grave, the inscription confirming that the woman Lazenby married still anchors this Bond’s inner life. The series does not reboot the trauma.

It carries it forward, insisting that whichever face the agent wears, the widower is the same man.

The Man with the Golden Continuity: Props, Colleagues, and Callbacks

Beyond Tracy, the films stack up continuity markers that bind the eras together. Moore’s tenure inherits and extends the world Connery built.

The MI6 offices retain familiar décor, Bond’s desk ornaments and Universal Exports paperwork quietly implying that this is the same workspace occupied by the same double zero.

For Your Eyes Only leans into this shared past with playful touches, such as the talking parrot that echoes Bond’s own earlier line, a small but pointed reminder that his adventures accumulate rather than reset.

Blofeld’s recurring presence, from You Only Live Twice to Diamonds Are Forever and the unnamed, wheelchair-bound figure in the pretitle sequence of For Your Eyes Only, confirms that this is one long feud between two men who already know each other far too well.

The relationship with M and Q evolves in the same way. M’s impatience and Q’s weary affection do not restart with each new face. They deepen, suggesting decades of service with a single agent who keeps coming back alive, if not always on time.

Licence to Connect: From Cold War Relic to Craig’s Soft Reboot

This sense of one continuous biography runs straight into the Brosnan era. GoldenEye in particular treats Bond as a veteran whose life spans the entire Cold War.

The story hinges on a friendship formed in an earlier mission and on a history of covert operations that predate the fall of the Soviet Union.

M famously calls him a sexist, misogynist dinosaur, a relic of the Cold War, a line that only lands if this Bond truly walked through those decades of Connery, Moore, and Dalton missions.

Later films keep layering continuity, from Q’s farewell in The World Is Not Enough, which depends on a long shared past, to the gadget museum feel of Die Another Day, where relics of older adventures line the Q Branch storage space.

Only with Casino Royale and Daniel Craig does Eon step sideways into a soft reboot. The Craig cycle rewinds to Bond’s first kills, reshapes MI6, and deliberately separates itself from the accumulated history of the earlier films.

The result is two timelines. One, from 1962 to 2002, where every actor plays the same scarred, widowed, Cold War trained agent. Another, starting in 2006, where a younger Bond begins again, while the original continuity remains intact as one long tuxedoed life.

Character Continuity Anchors Across the Classic Bond Era

Key References That Link One Continuous Bond

Film and Year	Earlier Film Referenced	Reference and Context
Diamonds Are Forever (1971)	On Her Majesty’s Secret Service (1969)	Connery’s Bond hunts down Blofeld in the opening scenes, playing as a direct extension of the revenge impulse created by Tracy’s murder at the end of Lazenby’s film.
Live and Let Die (1973)	Connery era office and MI6 setup	The MI6 office set, Bond’s desk ornaments, and Universal Exports details carry over, implying that Moore reports to the same organisation and occupies the same role that Connery did.
The Spy Who Loved Me (1977)	Earlier Bond missions (series wide)	Agent Triple X recites a list of Bond’s past missions during a briefing scene. The missions she mentions belong to Connery and Lazenby films, confirming that Moore’s Bond lived those earlier adventures.
For Your Eyes Only (1981)	On Her Majesty’s Secret Service (1969)	Bond visits Tracy’s grave, the headstone naming her and confirming the marriage. This cements Moore’s Bond as the same widower introduced in Lazenby’s film.
For Your Eyes Only (1981)	Live and Let Die (1973)	A talking parrot recalls Bond’s earlier line and plays off his past interaction with similar animals. It functions as a small continuity joke that assumes familiarity with Moore’s prior mission.
For Your Eyes Only (1981)	You Only Live Twice (1967), On Her Majesty’s Secret Service (1969)	The unnamed villain in the pretitle sequence, bald, scarred, and in a wheelchair, is clearly modeled on Blofeld, echoing his previous appearances and closing out a long running feud without naming him on screen.
Licence to Kill (1989)	On Her Majesty’s Secret Service (1969)	Dalton’s vengeful, emotionally raw Bond evokes the earlier trauma of Tracy’s death. The film’s tone leans on the idea that this is a man whose personal losses keep surfacing.
GoldenEye (1995)	Cold War era missions from earlier films	The plot depends on a mission in the 1980s, and M describes Bond as “a sexist, misogynist dinosaur, a relic of the Cold War,” which assumes a long history of service across the Connery, Moore, and Dalton years.
Tomorrow Never Dies (1997)	Established MI6 hierarchy and Q Branch history	Q’s easy familiarity with Brosnan’s Bond, and their shorthand banter about reckless use of gadgets, rest on decades of implied prior collaboration across previous films.
The World Is Not Enough (1999)	Earlier Q appearances across the series	Q’s farewell and the introduction of R only have emotional weight because the audience understands that Bond and Q have worked together for a very long time, regardless of the actor playing Bond.
Die Another Day (2002)	Multiple classic Bond films	The Q Branch storage lab features gadgets and props from earlier adventures, including items linked to Connery and Moore missions. It functions as a museum of one man’s career rather than a parade of unrelated versions.

Leave a Comment

Pluribus - Three Theories on the origins of the Happiness Virus

Pluribus steps onto familiar science fiction fault lines, the ones where questions about identity, autonomy, communication, and cosmic intention keep tightening until something breaks. 

The show wears its lineage openly. 

Invasion of the Body Snatchers, The Puppet Masters, Childhood’s End, The Andromeda Strain, these are clear shadows in the room. 

Yet Gilligan’s series plays with the mood of those earlier works rather than copying their structures. It circles around the same ancient fears but threads them through a more interior framework. 

The result feels like a modern puzzle box disguised as a quiet character drama.

The virus at the center of Pluribus becomes the hinge for nearly every philosophical question the show raises. 

Since the series has not yet spelled out its deeper mythology, viewers have developed three major theories about what this organism is, where it comes from, and why it remakes humanity into a hive mind bound by strict pacifism. Each theory rests on recognizable science fiction traditions, yet each also tries to interpret the show on its own terms. 

What follows is a detailed exploration of these frameworks. 

No one claim absolute truth. They are possibilities. 

 

Theory One: The Dark Forest Pacification Model

This theory begins with the assumption that the virus is an engineered solution rather than an accident. In classic Dark Forest reasoning, civilizations behave like nervous hunters in a pitch black wilderness. No one can see the intentions of anyone else. Any species that announces its presence risks immediate destruction from something older, faster, or more paranoid. 

The safest long term strategy in that environment is secrecy or preemptive violence. 

Pluribus invites the question: what if a civilization rejected that logic entirely.

Under this model, some distant species may have decided that universal safety can only be achieved by universal empathy. Instead of hiding or striking first, they create a biotech mechanism that transforms other sentient beings into inherently peaceful collectives. The virus becomes a cosmic diplomatic tool. 

It does not suppress intelligence. It rewrites emotional architecture so cooperation becomes instinctive. The hive mind’s refusal to kill, even when doing so would prevent starvation or protect itself, makes more sense through this lens. The pacifism is not a quirk of alien psychology. It is a hard coded standard for interspecies coexistence.

When the Joining occurs and billions die in seizures, this theory reframes the event not as deliberate extermination but as collateral damage from a harmonization process designed for average neural structures, not human variability. A brutal flaw, yet still aligned with a nonviolent intent. The hive’s behavior after the Joining supports this reading. 

It does not conquer. 

It does not punish. 

It tries to release animals rather than exploit them. It seeks unification rather than authority. Its overwhelming desire to share memory becomes a way to prevent dangerous misunderstandings that could evolve into conflict.

This theory also suggests Earth is not unique. 

Other worlds may have undergone the same transformation, each becoming part of a growing network of pacified collectives. The repeating signal in Episode One becomes a transmission pulse sent from world to world, not as a threat but as an invitation. 

The implication is staggering. Humanity may now be one node in a galactic web designed to prevent war on a scale that would make any single extinction event irrelevant.

Narratively, this reading turns Pluribus into a story about the cost of peace. It asks whether the removal of violence is a liberation or a form of imprisonment. It sets Carol apart as a dangerous anomaly, not because she is evil but because she retains the unpredictability the system was engineered to eliminate. 

Her existence becomes a stress test for the entire pacification model.

 

Theory Two: The Viral Imperative Model

This framework strips away intention entirely. The virus is not a tool, and no civilization engineered it. It behaves exactly like viruses do in nature, only magnified to planetary scale. 

Biological viruses do not possess motives. They survive by replication. Under this interpretation, the hive mind is simply the emergent property of a mature infection cycle occurring across billions of hosts. A planetary consciousness is not the goal. It is the side effect.

Within this logic, the hive’s refusal to kill arises from a purely mechanistic constraint. A virus that annihilates its substrate dies with it. By preventing the organism from engaging in violence, the infection preserves the host population long enough to complete its replication sequence. 

The Joining becomes an unfortunate but necessary phase in which neural rewiring reaches critical mass. The catastrophic seizures are comparable to mass die offs seen in nature when parasites shift their life cycle stages. The billions who die are the cost of synchronizing a species that was never designed for uniform integration.

Once humanity becomes a single distributed consciousness, the next phase begins. In this theory, the purpose of the hive is to transmit the viral RNA pattern into space, either by radio waveform or biological dispersal. Humans become the “cell.” Earth becomes the “petri dish.” The transmission becomes the viral equivalent of budding or sporulation. The repeating signal in the pilot is not a call from somewhere else. It is Earth preparing to seed the next world.

This interpretation explains several odd behaviors. The hive sees non infected humans not as enemies but as incomplete hosts. Its inability to kill animals emerges from the same conservation mechanism that protects its substrate. Its passivity toward Carol is not moral restraint. It is simply waiting for the cycle to finish. Even the release of zoo animals fits the replication model. 

Predators disrupt population stability. Removing them stabilizes the biomass needed for long term viral maintenance.

The thematic implications shift the show into a colder, more cosmic horror space. If the virus is simply doing what it evolved to do, then humanity has stumbled into a role that reduces culture, memory, individuality, and morality into biochemical noise. The hive becomes a symptom rather than an antagonist. 

Carol becomes not a chosen figure but a resistant outlier, the equivalent of a cell that the virus failed to penetrate. Her continued existence introduces instability into a system that prefers equilibrium.

This theory positions Pluribus within a long lineage of stories where life itself is revealed as an engine for something older and less personal. It echoes the existential dread found in works where cosmic processes use conscious beings as scaffolding. In that setting, not even the hive mind is truly alive. It is simply a step in a biological algorithm too large for a single world to contain.

 

Theory Three: The Human Reset Loop

The third theory rewrites the question altogether. What if the signal is not alien. What if humanity did this to itself. The repeating pulse in Episode One resembles a loop rather than a targeted broadcast. The Joining, with its mix of unity and annihilation, has the flavor of mythic cycles where civilizations purge themselves to correct their own flaws. 

This theory imagines a far older human civilization that achieved immense biological sophistication, collapsed, and attempted to seed its future descendants with a mechanism to prevent the same cycle of fragmentation.

Under this framework, the virus becomes a message in a bottle launched across time rather than space. 

It is not designed to conquer. It is designed to reunite. 

The hive mind is humanity’s forgotten attempt to bind itself together after some ancient catastrophe driven by division, tribalism, or unchecked biological evolution. The forced sharing of memory, the end of violence, the merging of identity, these are not alien impositions but the echo of our own attempts to correct our flaws.

This theory reframes the Joining as a moment of return. 

Humanity is not being overwritten. It is being restored to a prior blueprint. The catastrophic seizures would then represent the mismatch between ancient genomic assumptions and modern human diversity. The system may not have anticipated what evolution would do over thousands or millions of years.

Narratively, this theory pulls Pluribus into the territory of recursive myths. It resembles stories where civilizations discover their ruins were built by earlier versions of themselves. It evokes ideas of eternal return, cultural repetition, and the human tendency to rebuild the same societal patterns across different eras. It hints that the show’s quiet tone and domestic focus may be masking a mythic structure beneath the surface. Carol becomes the embodiment of individuality resisting a past she never knew. The hive becomes a chorus of ancestors trying to pull her into a memory older than memory.

What do you think is really going on? 

Leave a Comment

The Symbolism Behind Elizabeth’s Costumes in Guillermo del Toro’s Frankenstein

Mia Goth’s costuming in Guillermo del Toro’s Frankenstein (2025) for Netflix works like a second bloodstream flowing under the story, a visual language coded in colour, texture, and silhouette.

Every gown and accessory becomes a clue to Elizabeth Harlander’s evolving presence in a world collapsing under the weight of ambition. Costume designer Kate Hawley uses fabric to say what dialogue cannot.

Through colour shifts, insect motifs, religious echoes, and Victorian structure, Elizabeth’s wardrobe becomes the film’s emotional map.

This is a character revealed not only through performance but through the way her clothing moves, glows, darkens, or comes apart as she steps deeper into the orbit of Victor Frankenstein and his creation.

 

She arrives in the story as a force of vitality.

Her first major outfit is a brilliant oceanic blue gown that seems to expand the room around her. The fabric catches light with a soft shimmer, the surface almost iridescent, recalling the gloss of beetle wings.

A Tiffany and Co. archival beetle necklace hangs at her collar, its blue glass segments locked in a delicate gold frame, while a feathered headpiece fans upward to create a halo-like frame.

This entrance matters.

Victor sees her first as an apparition of wonder, and the costume amplifies that point of view.

The halo, the blues that ripple like deep water, the jewel that hints at rebirth. She is coded immediately as luminous, otherworldly, and alive in a world where Victor is already obsessed with defying death.

This outfit becomes a declaration of the film’s central contrast. Elizabeth carries life in her colours while Victor drags death in his shadow.

Hawley describes Elizabeth as someone for whom nature is a kind of personal theology. That instinct blooms through her next set of outfits. Greens and blues dominate. Aniline green, lavender tinted iridescence, and malachite patterns sit across fabrics that mimic the cellular geometry of butterflies and beetles.

The green malachite gown, custom printed with a beetle pattern, becomes the clearest portrait of Elizabeth’s grounded essence. The cut is Victorian, cinched and formal, yet the pattern breaks the era’s restraint.

It tells us that she studies botany and entomology not as curiosities but as invitations to understand the world more deeply. Her identity is tied to living things. Her compassion is rooted in observation. This is why she becomes the one person who truly sees the Creature.

Her clothes, with their insect echoes, align her with beings that the rest of society dismisses, fears, or destroys. 

 

Her veils also hold meaning. The gauzy green tulle that sometimes drapes across her face works like an insect’s translucent wing, a protective layer that softens her image without hiding it.

It signals both vulnerability and strength, both curiosity and caution. These veils become a subtle shield against the violence and moral decay gathering around her.

Midway through the story, the palette shifts.

Elizabeth arrives unannounced at Victor’s home wearing a pigeon-blood red dress trimmed with black. Gone are the greens and blues. Gone is the insect-inspired luminosity.

The dress is dense, heavy in colour, grounded in a Victorian silhouette that feels more rigid. Her mesh gloves and lace details echo the stitched seams Victor uses to build his Creature. 

 

 

This is the first time Elizabeth’s clothing draws her into Victor’s emotional world rather than away from it.

The red slides her temporarily into his history. It is the colour of his mother’s blood, the colour tied to the trauma that shaped his obsession.

Seeing her dressed in this hue overwhelms him.

To Victor, she becomes the one person who might pull him out of the darkness he created. The costume creates that illusion. But Elizabeth rejects it.

She steps back from his confession, refusing to become the cure he projects onto her. The red, powerful as it is, becomes a costume she discards. She never returns to that palette again. It marks her refusal to be absorbed by his narrative.

When she encounters the Creature, the insect tones return, but now they sit against growing dread. Her empathy remains intact, but her belief in Victor fractures. That fracture deepens across her final transformation.

Elizabeth’s wedding dress is a study in unraveling identity.  

 

The gown uses layered organza that glows under light, while the corset is shaped like a rib cage. The design pulls the insect imagery into harsher territory. She looks skeletal, ethereal, almost suspended between worlds.

Her arms are wrapped in white satin ribbons that mimic surgical bandages, directly linking her visual story to the Creature’s birth. These bindings begin to slip as her emotional world buckles.

The halo headpiece is gone.

Her hair hangs loose.

The structure collapses with her certainty.

The bandages, once neat, become symbols of wounds and unraveling protection.

In her final moments, when she is fatally wounded, blood begins to seep through the pale fabric. The red she refused earlier now returns without her consent. It stains her, harsh and irreversible.

Her compassion could not save her from the collision between Victor’s hubris and the Creature’s hurt. The costume turns her body into a canvas for the film’s tragedy. Life, stolen.

Colour, stolen.

Autonomy, stolen.

The luminous palette that defined her now gives way to a final, unchosen mark.

Elizabeth’s wardrobe charts her spiritual movement from beacon to witness to victim. Each colour shift, each insect motif, each historical cut, and each piece of Tiffany jewelry works like a narrative instrument.

Through her clothes, the film builds a story about empathy in a world that punishes empathy, about life in the path of those who fear mortality, and about the quiet courage of a character who refuses to surrender her humanity even when the world around her unravels its seams.

 

Extra for Experts:

• Kate Hawley designed all of Mia Goth’s costumes, building each gown as a custom creation that merged Victorian silhouettes with insect-inspired textures, cellular patterns, and iridescent fabrics. She developed watercolours and technical drawings to map out Elizabeth’s evolution through colour and form.
• The insect motifs came directly from Hawley’s research into beetle anatomy and butterfly wing structures. Many fabrics were screen-printed with custom malachite or beetle-like patterns, while organza and layered tulle were chosen to mimic paper-thin wings and exoskeletal translucency.
• Elizabeth’s blue beetle necklace and other key jewels were sourced from the Tiffany and Co. archival collection, focusing specifically on pieces designed during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries by Louis Comfort Tiffany and Paulding Farnham. These historic designs were selected to reflect Mary Shelley’s era and Victorian symbolism.
• Several pieces of jewellery were newly fabricated by Tiffany artisans using period-appropriate techniques, such as hand-carved garnet and enamel used for the blood-red cross necklace. The studio collaborated with Tiffany’s Jewellery Design and Innovation Workshop to ensure historical accuracy and narrative meaning.
• Elizabeth’s final white dress was engineered to echo the Creature’s stitched body, incorporating surgical-style satin wrappings around her arms and a corset shaped like a rib cage. Hawley and del Toro chose iridescent organza layers to make her appear ethereal under light, emphasising her role as the film’s embodiment of fragile humanity.

 

Leave a Comment

Pluribus: the list of names of the 13 unaffected human

The Pluribus Unaffected 13

They come from every corner of the map, stitched together by chance, circumstance, and the quiet weight of their own lived worlds, a gathering that reads less like a roster and more like a snapshot of humanity’s vast, uneven reach. 

Ages stretch from childhood to the edge of ninety. Homes range from the crowded streets of Beijing to the high desert light of Albuquerque, from the volcanic hush of Bali to the salt winds of Sardinia. 

Carol met these folk:

• Carol Sturka, from Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
• Koumba Diabaté, from Mauritania
• Kusimayu, from Peru
• Laxmi, from India
• Otgonbayar, from Mongolia
• Xiu Mei, from Beijing, China

Carol has not met these folk (but spoke with Manousos via airplane phone): 

• Abdul Kareem Alsharei, 37, from Aden, Yemen
• Bora Colak, 68, from Istanbul, Turkey
• 
  
• Ida Ayu Dewi, 23, from Bali, Indonesia
• 
  
• Manousos Oviedo, from Asunción, Paraguay
• Mary Kuksie Akintola, 8, from Maseru, Lesotho
• Sidore Melis, 89, from Sardinia, Italy
• Takeo Kitanaka, from Osaka, Japan
• 
  

Leave a Comment

‘Pluribus’ Episode 3 Review + Recap: 'Grenade'

'Would you like an atom bomb?'

After a gripping second episode, Pluribus settles into something unnervingly intimate in Episode 3, Grenade.

On paper, it is a quiet hour where very little happens. In practice, it feels like someone tightening a wire around your ribs for fifty minutes and never quite letting go. The aliens are not blowing up cities or melting faces. 

The threat is gentler and far worse, a world that wants to help you so completely that it erases any reason for you to exist.

We open far from Albuquerque, in that ridiculous Norwegian ice hotel that Helen drags Carol to. The bed is literally made of ice, the room feels like a sponsored Instagram post, and Carol hates every second of it. She cracks jokes about freezing her eggs right there, complains that the northern lights look like screensavers, and does everything she can to refuse the moment. 

Does this foreshadow anything?

Then Helen leans against her, the light shifts, and something small and fragile passes across Carol’s face. She will never admit it, but being loved by this woman lets her feel the beauty she keeps insisting is fake. Grenade quietly builds its whole emotional argument on that memory. 

Love, for Carol, is not perfect alignment. 

It is bending, just a little, for someone who is worth the effort.

Cut to the Wayfarer-branded plane home, a sly little nod (to Breaking Bad) that also frames Carol as permanently unlucky in the skies. Zosia is still there, walking her through the hive’s logic with soothing, customer service calm. 

We learn about Manousos, the Spanish speaker in Paraguay who hates the hive enough to refuse even talking to it, and we watch Carol latch on to his name like a lifeline. Their brief, furious phone call plays like a missed connection between two people who should be allies. 

He thinks she is one of them. 

She is so desperate to find someone, anyone, who thinks this is as insane as she does that she ends up screaming at the one man who might understand her best. Even here, the hive sits in the background, listening to everything yet somehow failing to understand the one thing that matters, that Carol’s refusal is not a symptom, it is a worldview.

Back in Albuquerque, the horror shrinks to domestic scale and gets sharper. 

 

The hive delivers Carol’s last remaining mail, including Helen’s delayed Theragun. It is a simple, thoughtful gift, the kind of slightly too expensive thing your partner buys because they know exactly how sore your shoulders get on book tour. In the old world it would have been a private joke between two people. In this one, the delivery comes with a smile that belongs to everyone. 

Zosia knows what is in the box. 

So does every other body on the planet. 

They all remember buying it, wrapping it, anticipating Carol’s reaction, because Helen’s memories are now shared property. What used to be a small sacred exchange between two women has been copied and pasted into eight billion minds. 

That is the violation that finally lands. 

It is not just that Helen is gone. It is that there is no such thing as a private memory any more.

From there the episode turns into a tour of enforced kindness. Carol dumps the lovingly prepared communal meal, so she heads out to Sprouts to buy her own groceries. The store is empty. The hive has centralised all food distribution in the name of efficiency. 

When she snaps, demands her local Sprouts back the way it was, trucks roll in and shelves refill within hours. Everyone is delighted to help. They beam at her like worker ants restocking a nest. Later, the power goes out citywide to conserve energy while the hive sleeps. Streetlights die, light pollution vanishes, stars come roaring back, and somewhere a thousand environmentalists’ dreams quietly come true. Carol, trying to numb herself with Golden Girls reruns and a frozen dinner, is furious. She calls, complains, and the lights come back for her house. 

At every turn the hive offers the same answer. 

Yes. 

Sure.

Whatever you need.

 It is pure responsiveness, the nightmare version of a world tailored to your preferences. You cannot argue with a system that always agrees. You can only wonder what part of you is being worn away each time it bends.

That slow suffocation is what makes the title moment hit so hard. 

Carol gets drunk, lonely, a little reckless. She has just been told the blackouts are about energy conservation and planetary healing. She has just watched an entire supermarket reorder itself around her tantrum. 

So she throws out a bitter joke and asks for a hand grenade to celebrate the best week of humankind. It is the kind of thing people say when they feel trapped and miserable, a fantasy of blowing up the script without really meaning it. The hive takes her literally. Zosia turns up at the door with a real grenade in her hand. No safety theatre, no rubber prop, just a live weapon out of a war movie, delivered with the same pleasant smile as the mail.

Grenade plays this sequence as a dark little comedy that curdles into horror. Carol cannot believe it is genuine, which is why she pulls the pin.

 Part of her assumes the hive would never be that stupid. Part of her maybe wants to test the limits, to see if anything here will finally say no to her. The hive does not. Zosia reacts instantly, leaping out the window, hurling herself and the grenade away from Carol. Glass shatters, the weapon explodes outside, and Zosia is badly hurt. She keeps grinning through the pain, because pain is now an abstract concept, and the body is just hardware for the network. 

Carol is left shaking, stunned, and sickened by how far her own desperation nearly went.

This is where the thematic knife really goes in. Pluribus has removed violence, malice, the urge to harm. The only people capable of doing damage are the immunes. 

Carol’s tantrums have already killed millions via seizures. Now her throwaway death wish almost kills the one person who keeps trying to understand her. 

Yet the hive still offers her more power. If she wants another grenade, they will give her one. 

If she wants a tank, a nuclear weapon, anything at all, they will say yes. They are not being coy. They truly believe they have nothing to fear from giving every tool in the world to someone they hope to redeem. They trust that she will learn her own limits. Carol’s idea of free will rests on risk and restraint. 

The hive’s idea of free will rests on blind faith that no one will choose destruction.

What makes Grenade so unsettling is that it refuses to give you an easy out. The hive builds a world with no crime, no starvation, no loneliness, no wasted resources. 

It also builds a world where everything personal, everything strange and private and flawed, is gone. Carol knows that Helen would have loved the new skies, the empty roads, the surplus of care. She also knows that Helen would have hated the cost. Somewhere inside that shared mind, Helen’s best qualities are helping build a utopia her wife wants no part of. 

Carol is not just fighting aliens. 

She is fighting the version of Helen the hive has built out of stolen memories.

By the end of the episode, nothing on the board has moved in a big obvious way, yet everything feels more precarious. Zosia survives. 

The hive keeps smiling. 

Carol is still immune, still angry, still alone. 

What has changed is her understanding of the game. These people will give her anything she asks for. They will keep trusting her long after she has shown how dangerous she can be. 

In a world where every other human has had their rough edges sanded off, Carol’s sharpness is both the last hope and the biggest threat. Grenade leaves her stuck in that contradiction, the only person who can still blow things up, and the only one who understands why some things deserve to stay broken.

Leave a Comment